We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 45°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

Authorities reject Culinary Communion's Gabriel Claycamp, again

3/19/09 Update: Culinary Communion is Closed.

****

Culinary Communion owner Gabriel Claycamp is a man accustomed to flying by the seat of his pants.  And he loves his spotlight in the media. 

While he is charming and engaging, what lies behind the sweet smile is cunning and deception. 

For years rumors have been swirling about unpaid bills, questionable health code practices...and then there was his illegal underground restaurant, Gypsy. "Shh....don't tell anyone," unless you can get me a spot on national television or magazine coverage.  The authorities finally caught up with him and shut Gypsy down.

Then, ironically, it was Claycamp who cried foul.  "There's a traitor among us."

Yeah, right.

The latest saga in Claycamp's woes deal with a little operation called the Swinery.  But the health department's not buying it. Here's one space where being above the law isn't going to cut it.

And I'm rooting for the health department here. 

Having worked with Claycamp in the past, I can attest to some seriously questionable health code violations. I'll never forget running downstairs to grab supplies from the second refrigerator. 

What I discovered was more like a murder scene.  

Blood (for boudin sausage) splashed & spilled down the front of the refrigerator, splattering on the floor. Away from student eyes, by the time I saw it, the blood was a caked & flaking mess. 

Crying foul fell on deaf ears...and I severed my relationship with Claycamp as fast as possible.

The Seattle PI's piece on Claycamp has stirred the pot, and the comments are downright hysterical.  One day, this rogue will get his due. And it looks like it's coming sooner than later.  Read on.

 

 

Advertisement

By

Seattle Food Examiner

Have fork, will travel! A veteran of the food industry Traca takes it to the streets, shining a spotlight on the city's back rooms, alleys, trucks,...

Comments

  • Heidi Kenyon 3 years ago
    Report Abuse

    This "article" is fallacious, defamatory, and libelous according to the definition described in RCW 9.58.010. Examiner.com is liable for the content herein according to RCW 9.58.040. This post should be removed immediately. Please do contact me with any questions.

  • TKingston 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Wow what interesting comments on the Seattle PI piece. The thing that I don't understand about Heidi and Gabe is why all the argumentative behavior. Why not simply admit fault and say how they are going to resolve and fix the problems that they have created. We live in an apologetic society. People admit fault, explain how they plan to fix whatever was wrong, and then it's old news and not a story. Had Heidi or Gabe simply done this, there probably would have been few if any comments posted to the Seattle PI article. Plain and simple, no matter how you slice it, if you are in the wrong - and they were - why try to hide it? Admit mistakes were made and own up to it. Combative responses make them look worse, first because it gives the impression that they somehow don't think they have done anything wrong, and secondly because in in the end it is giving them both more of a black eye. All people will remember in the end of this is that Gabe really messed up. As opposed to mistakes were made, solutions realized and fixed...

  • mo 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    How hysterical! Heidi, it's the truth, you just can't handle it!

  • TroyS 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    As a small business owner (food business), yes there are regulation hoops that you jump through, but on the whole they are reasonable. And food inspectors will work with you if you try. Prior to our launching our operation a food / building inspector reviewed all my plans and we discussed options that were both economical and met the state requirements. I see a lot of posts about how difficult things are or were for the Swinery and CC. Well they are not. I'd rather comply with the law then produce food in an environment where I might endanger someone's life. Think about it from another view, what if you ate something and got sick from it. The later found out the place was not complying with state food regulations. You'd probably be pretty angry. You might think, "I'll sue them!" Simply put the regs are for two purposes, protecting both the shop owner from being sued, and protecting the consumer from eating something that might make them sick.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...