
Photo courtesy of
Sebastian Kaulitzki
So sits a man with a lap but no top, two eyes with no pod, yet his apple would spark an epiphany that would forever change the world. As Sir Isaac Newton sat in his garden he observed an apple falling to the ground. This apple would serve as the catalyst to his formulation of the Law of Universal Gravitation.
Some centuries later another guy, who is rumored to be the first to give a "high five," came up with a theory that was much more than rumor. Einstein's theory of relativity looked at gravity in a revolutionary way and answered some questions that Newton's theory couldn't. After Einstein's theory was proven through countless experiments it was accepted by the scientific world and has served to expand our knowledge of the universe. When this theory came out it didn't mean that Newton's law didn't apply. In fact, many sciences still use the Law of Universal Gravitation today as it is amazingly accurate in most all but mysterious phenomena, such as black holes. Neither of these two theories were taken as truth when they were presented, only after extensive experimental verification were they accepted.
This example was not written to be an analogy concerning the research and theory of low carbohydrate diets but rather as an illustration of the scientific method and its vital role in our accumulation of knowledge. New ideas, counterpoints, questions and investigation drives our understanding of nutrition and the human body. When new results or information is obtained through research it can become generally accepted by the scientific community only after several studies by many different researchers replicate and confirm the new findings.
In an age where an apple can instantly connect you to the world, caution must be taken when gathering and spreading information about something as important as a diet. It is not by chance or blind conformism that the majority of the scientific community advocates against the Atkins style low-carb diet. One commenter stated this perfectly on my first post: "The National Academy of Sciences, the American Medical Association, the American Dietetic Association, the American Cancer Society, the American Heart Association, the American Kidney Fund, the American College of Sports Medicine, Johns Hopkins and the National Institutes of Health all advise against such diets. I believe your critics will be hard pressed to find a single major medical, nutrition, or science-based organization that fully endorses the low-carb diet for long-term health." I have never been one to embrace an idea simply because of its popularity or discredit a new hypothesis because it hasn’t been proven. However, I strongly believe that in regards to our understanding of health science “experiment is supreme.” Before embracing the latest sensationalistic nutritional headline i.e. “saturated fat lowers heart disease risk” (which will be discussed in the next article) make sure to read past the marketability of those claims to see what the study truly reveals.
I really appreciate the interest and comments that this series has generated so far, some of them have been pretty wild. Sadly many of the assertions point back to my first paragraph in the series and the reason I decided to start addressing low-carb issues. Some of the obstinate statements and unfounded assumptions appear to be derived from emotional convictions. Consequently, I’d like to clarify my stance on nutrition before I post my next article dealing with what studies have and have not proven.
I have never advocated a traditional "low fat" diet. As I stated in a previous article, I don't really like the term “diet.” That being said, the one that most closely reflects my daily food consumption and what I recommend to clients and friends is the "Paleo Diet for Athletes," created by one of my professors at CSU Loren Cordain. The focus is on lean meats, fruits, vegetables and lots of healthy fat sources such as olive oil, canola oil and some nuts with attention to carbohydrate intake from higher glycemic-index sources (honey, energy bars, sports drinks) before, during and following endurance exercise. The carbohydrate sources I consume and recommend outside of energy bars and gels during prolonged activity are from fruits and vegetables (except white potatoes). I also occasionally eat some whole grains such as oatmeal, brown rice and whole wheat bread.
Once again thanks for the interest and keep an eye out as the information presented in the next article may surprise you.











Comments
I've been low carb (but not religiously so) for over a year. I have lost about 25 lbs and have kept it off without counting calories. I do share my son's weekly pizza allowance, but for the most part, bread, rice, crackers, doughnuts, french fries etc are all off the menu and I don't miss them.
as for: "The National Academy of Sciences, the American Medical Association, the American Dietetic Association, the American Cancer Society, the American Heart Association, the American Kidney Fund, the American College of Sports Medicine, Johns Hopkins and the National Institutes of Health"
-- these are the guys who've been guiding American nutrition throughout the growth of the obesity crisis and the continuing epidemic of heart disease and diabetes. Why do I give a rat's behind what they have to say?
Not only does The Paleo Diet for Athletes recommend a lower carbohydrate diet, but it is the source of those carbohydrates that are very important. Grains like wheat are not only high in carbohydrates, but also acidify the body and have other components which can promote autoimmune disease and other negative health consequences.
Hey Wiley. You hit the nail on the head! Like I stated in previous posts not all carbohydrates are the same and balance is needed, excess consumption of grains is not the best road to health. Although the Paleo Diet reflects the majority of what I eat and recommend, I believe that some whole grain intake is necessary for practicality and offers additional health benefits and an occasional tasty treat. Relying solely on vegetables for carbs can be tough (believe me I've tried), especially when you dont have a lot of time to prepare food for
work ;)
Jeremy, if you are even remotely interested in the science, go out and purchase Gary Taubes "Good Calories, Bad Calories". You will learn more about human metabolism than you currently know today. It's important to speak from a position of knowledge. not dogma when you discuss nutrition.
Thanks for the note Sarah! As entertaining as reading that whole book would be I think I got my fill of a science journalists take on nutrition with the "big fat lie" article a while back. I couldn't agree more about speaking from knowledge. Don't get me wrong, I love science fiction, but not when it applies to physiology;) Keep reading and the truth shall set you towards some melons, apples and a yam!
Jeremy,
I have a little theory: You know those kids who fed their vegetables to the dog under the table or who would sit in front of a cold plate of cauliflower for hours refusing to appease their parents nutritious encouragement? Now they have Atkins! What a perfectly timed excuse (gimmick)! Keep up the honest reporting; the naysayers crutches are bound to break under the weight of scientific evidence at any moment.
P.S. While Garry Taubes may be a good writer, he has no formal training in nutrition or medicine. I wouldnt take my roommates investment advice just because hed logged onto an online stock trading account before!
Please be sure to visit the Metabolism Society's site if you're interested in learning about the science behind low carb. www.MetabolismSociety.org
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!