Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Washington DC Politics NY Homeland Security Examiner
NY Homeland Security Examiner

Too much MSG leading to an unclear thought process?

December 2, 6:28 AMNY Homeland Security ExaminerMichael Haltman
Comment Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the NY Homeland Security Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

You Know That Woozy Feeling You Get?

I know that in the United States there are often signs in Chinese restaurants that claim there is no MSG in the food. That light headed feeling you get during and after lets you know that there really was. Having spent 3 weeks in Mainland China I can tell you that, as a rule, there is no MSG in the food. My question is, therefore, where is the woozy mind coming from that leads the Chinese government to believe that diplomacy, not sanctions or force, will convince the Iranian government to not only stop production of enriched uranium, but to put off apparent plans to build more facilities?

Could it be that the Chinese have an idea that they will not be a target of either an Iranian ballistic missile with a nuclear warhead or of terrorists with suitcase nuclear devices? Or could it be that the commerce China is doing with Iran makes it economically unfeasible to jeopardize the relationship? Either way, the Chinese pose an impediment to the next logical step of tougher sanctions which would still not be effective, but would then open up the potential for the endgame of force to take the nukes out.

Given the apparent Chinese stance of complete appeasement, in the end (the end not being to long from now) it will only lead to a pre-emptive strike by a country that has much to lose from Iranian nukes. Here is a statement from a member of the Chinese Foreign Ministry. In China, the diplomats do not speak out of turn, but are directed in their comments.

(New York Times) "A China Foreign Ministry spokesman told a regular news conference Tuesday that sanctions ''are not the goal'' of new U.N. pressure on Iran. ''We should properly resolve this issue through dialogue,'' spokesman Qin Gang said. ''All parties should step up diplomatic efforts.''

Crisis Summation 

Written by Con Coughlin of the Telegraph, these thoughts spell out clearly that the James Bond clock is getting perilously close to 0:07, and unless someone steps up the world will face danger that makes the danger in the world today seem like a kindergarten class. Unless someone or some country develops the gumption to do what needs to be done, ending the charade, that clock might just get to 0:00.

( UK Telegraph) "Time is clearly not on the side of those attempting to talk Iran round. For the past six years, the West has been involved in intensive negotiations with Tehran to resolve this dispute, but all that has happened is that Iran has dramatically increased its nuclear capability while the West has received nothing in return.
This is a situation that can no longer be allowed to continue. If Iran wishes to persist with its defiant attitude, then it must face the consequences.
Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State, has argued in favour of "crippling" sanctions being imposed against Iran, and urgent action should now be taken to implement them as soon as possible, in a last-ditch effort to bring Tehran to its senses. Otherwise the consequences are too dreadful to contemplate."

Picture courtesy of HubPages

 

Add a Comment

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Follow us on Twitter
Keep up with the latest, greatest buzz from Examiner.com on Twitter.

Recent Articles

Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Survey Conducted By The Medicus Firm These are findings of The Medicus Firm, a national physician search firm, that surveyed 1000 doctors in order to …
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Nancy Pelosi and the Do Whatever It Takes Solution To Passing Health Care Reminiscent of the John Kerry I was for it before I was against it gambit, …

Find a Business

What:
Where: