Sotomayor and the politics of race
Yesterday's decision by the Supreme Court to reverse Sonia Sotomayor's ruling on the New Haven firefighters case was undoubtedly a blow (albeit, not fatal) to the woman who aspires to sit on the nations' highest court. The Philadelphia Inquirer offers this viewpoint:
“Yesterday's ruling that white New Haven firefighters were unfairly denied promotions because of their race became an instant talking point for foes of Sotomayor.
"She was among three appellate judges who had rejected the white firefighters' claim of discrimination.
"Conservatives argued that the appellate decision showed her to be a judicial activist who allows biases - particularly her backing of affirmative action policies - to taint her judgment.”
As the article goes on to state, this ruling does not seem to be the death knell for Sotomayor, however the ruling puts a spotlight on one of politics' dirty secrets: Race. Even while Barack Obama and his family occupy the White House, the politics of race has become a double edged sword for the administration.
During his presidential campaign, critics were silenced by the accusation, or fear of the accusation, of being a racist, even as Obama used his background numerous times to debunk claims that he was “not black enough” from minority voters. Often, Republicans, long saddled with the racist label, were stunned into silence by the often vicious attacks from the left.
Another example of racial politics occured during the press conference to announce Judge Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court. While there have been calls from such organizations as the National Council of La Raza to focus on Sotomayor's judicial record, the White House chose to attempt to batter the public with feelings of guilt. There was: “...the Inspiring Icon of the White House narrative, the Latina born in the Bronx, raised by her widowed mom who sacrificed everything for her daughter. With smarts and guts, Sotomayor graduated from Yale Law School, only to have her impeccable qualifications questioned by a prospective employer who'd been conditioned by race-based government policy to wonder if she'd made it that far only because of her Hispanic heritage.
"She's rightfully a beacon of hope to every Latina mother and daughter, from the Bronx to Chicago's Little Village and on to East L.A. The girls in the neighborhoods can see Sotomayor and aspire to greatness.
"But the other side of the story also speaks to racism. Not the knuckle-dragging kind shrieked by ignorant barbarians. That's easy to condemn, whether the knuckles are white, black or brown.
"Yet there is another kind. The media don't recognize it as racism and instead lard it with virtue, calling it by its Orwellian name: affirmative action. Yet many know it by what it is: government-backed racial preference.”
As an African American mom twenty plus years Sotomayor's junior, I lack the richness of her experiences, but not my own. Few people of color, or even those without a substantial income, do not have some type of compelling story. Poverty transcends race and background, and many share a kinship born of struggle. However, that does not mean that special treatment or quotas are in order. Independent Columnist Michael Gaynor sums up this point well. “It has been reported often that Judge Sotomayor graduated from Princeton College summa cum laude and was an editor of the Yale Law Journal, each a very impressive accomplishment, if achieved on the basis of merit.
"But, when Judge Sotomayor called herself 'the perfect affirmative action baby' and claimed inability to define merit, what was she really saying about her fitness to be a Supreme Court Justice?
"Did she mean that she was graded and judged less demandingly at Princeton and Yale and that was a good thing that paved her path to America's highest court?
"Is she 'perfect' for the position, or necessarily not up to par?
"Personally, I prefer to choose professionals, such as surgeons and dentists, based solely on merit.
"Likewise, I think that race-based grading and affirmative action Supreme Court Justices appointments are counterproductive indulgences better avoided.”
The inherent racism in the whole approach of the administration regarding nominations and attempts to silence critics have actually done more harm to minorities in general. Comedians have been seen on YouTube trying to get blacks "back in line" after they defected to the Republican party, and it has become acceptable to use hate speech to describe blacks who did reach their positions based upon merit. While the left questioned Clarence Thomas's blackness and called Condeleza Rice a Mammy, they also worked to keep blacks dependent on their system of handouts that included affirmative action.
Those words are political fire for some, but a look at the effects of affirmative action in modern day America give the appearance of telling blacks and other minorities, “hey, you will never make it without us.” By keeping minorities dependent on the government, they can become complacent and easier to control. Black conservative Kevin Jackson, author of The Big Black Lie: How I Learned the Truth about the Democrat Party offers insight into this topic: “Then there are the worst racists who know what is happening, yet and they pimp it. These are the Wrights, Jacksons, Sharptons, Clintons... They act like they care, and they do...they care about lining their pockets or increasing their power at the expense of the people the claim they wish to help.”
Even setting aside her "wise Latina" comment, Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court should set off alarm bells across the country. America was built on the blood, sweat, and sacrifice of others. White, black and brown all played some role in making this country great. If America is really the place where anything is possible, where does affirmative action fit in today? At what point does one achieve the American dream?