We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 54°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

Nuclear wastelands

Children of Arlit, Niger, site of France-Areva's uranium mine, play and walk on nuclear waste.
   Children outiside Arlit, Niger, site of a France-Areva uranium mine, play and walk on radioactive uranium mining waste.
                                                                                                              Photo Credit---Dr. Bruno Chareyron, CRIIRAD

"Nuclear is the answer being adopted by virtually every other country in the world," says Australian Opposition leader Ian MacFarlane, quoted on the website of ABC-Australia.  

That's a curious statement, since South Africa is the only nation in Africa with a nuclear power plant now, and few other nations in the Global South have nuclear power plants either, but, nevertheless, the answer to what?  Global warming, MacFarlane claims, like most proponents of the nuclear renaissance, though I suspect that he also feels secretly anxious, like so many leaders of nations without nuclear weapons.  As Ralph Nader pointed out in the 2008 presidential election, nuclear power plants are feedstocks for plutonium, which can be used to make nuclear bombs.

Sweden recently overturned its ban on nuclear power plants, as did Italy, whose leaders announced, on August 3rd, that EDF, (Electricité de France), and Enel (Ente Nazionale per l'Energia eLettrica), will begin to develop third-generation nuclear reactors there, ending the nuclear power moratorium created by an overwhelming Italian referendum in 1987, in response to the April 26, 1986 Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident.

But the question remains: what about the waste?   California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger thinks we can find a way to “use the leftovers”—nuclear reprocessing, the only proposed “solution,” aside from “uranium repatriation,” which means dumping nuclear waste back on the same people whose land you contaminated to mine it in the first place.

Nuclear reprocessing has created a toxic, virtually insoluble mess in the U.S. and in Britain, and Kenyan environmentalists are now understandably unhappy about the Oloolua reprocessing plant being built there, though Kenya doesn’t even have a nuclear power plant producing waste---or, producing electricity for Kenyans.

A nuclear power plant has been proposed in Kenya, to make the Oloolua plant look less like imperial pollution, but, more likely, to power an aluminum smelter for Western manufactures.

Greenpeace points out that nuclear waste has been rebranded "recycling"---a verb born of the environmental movement.

Like most all nuclear power and weapons enthusiasts, nuclear's new advocates ignore the first step of the process, uranium mining, one of the worst toxic assaults on Native America, indigenous Africa, Australia, Canada, Latin America, and the rest of the indigenous world, and, now, on the rougly 30 million people who rely on the water in the Colorado River Basin, on the roughly 30 million people who rely on the water in the Colorado River Basin, as I described in "Don't drink the uranium."   I've also written about uranium mining here, in "Uranium mining and weapons poisoning on the Navajo Nation," "Imperial nuclear power, " and "The worst nuclear accident in U.S. history: July 16, 1979, Navajo Reservation."

Anyone considering support for nuclear power in the U.S.A. should also reflect on the environmental racism at Entergy’s Grand Gulf Nuclear Power Plant, on Grand Gulf Island in the Mississippi River, next to the majority African American community of Port Gibson, which is so poor that they agreed to a nuclear power plant in their community, despite the environmental risk, in hopes of creating a corporate tax base for schools and social services.   The taxes were distributed, instead, throughout the State of Mississippi.   And, now, Entergy is constructing another reactor in their community, on Grand Gulf, despite repeated alarms, and, failures of the current reactor’s alarm systems.

There are nuclear power plants all up and down the Mississippi River, from Prairie Island, on the Dakota Reservation, and 50 miles southeast of Minneapolis St. Paul, to Grand Gulf Island/Port Gibson, Mississippi, and River Bend, Louisiana.  Like coal-fired power plants, they use lots of water, the natural resource that most expect to cause the next round of resource wars.

 

 

Advertisement

By

SF Energy Policy Examiner

Ann Garrison grew up around a radioactive toxic mess called the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, in a gorgeous place, Washington's Olympic Peninsula, by...

Comments

  • William Ernest Schenewerk, Ph.D. 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Atomic power plants actually consume radioactive waste. Minus starving to death in the dark, planet needs to mine roughly 200 MT-P2O5/y. Phosphates are needed to feed everyone and save the rain forests. Greenies are exploiting ignorance by claiming we only need to rotate crops. Problem is there is no phosphate in the air, so mineral phosphates must be mined and applied to replace what is carried off as food. Phosphates are roughly 100 ppm uranium. This is enough uranium to power 25,000 GWe using breeder reactors. Breeder reactor plutonium is only 2/3 Pu239 and is therefore useless for a weapon. Attempts to separate plutonium isotopes in secret will be discovered. Fugitive emissions will be invariably be detected. After roughly 1000 years, fission product curies is less than uranium curies consumed. Nukes consume radioactive waste that will otherwise end up in our food. The greenies apparently believe ignorance is truth.

  • Bob Nichols 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    An absolutely brilliant article that effortlessly weaves a tapestry of nuclear death and destruction from the bones of the dead and dying from radiation poisoning all over the world. Ann Garrison's command of things "nuclear" is a wonder to behold. Very well done.

    Bob Nichols
    Project Censored Award Winner
    San Francisco Bay View, the "Best of The Bay"

  • Ken Grubb 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    There is some nuclear waste recycling in the UK and France, but 3% of the waste is high level waste which cannot. While I think nuclear may be cleaner than the much hyped "clean coal", I don't buy the supposed expertise of "Dr. Schenewerk" who shows up all over the Net, but I cannot find an academic home for him.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...