.jpg)
“This guy (Attorney General Eric) Holder is a jerk,” Wolf told the Hill on Thursday out of frustration that the AG had rebuffed each request for answers.
Eric Holder is withholding information on the New Black Panther's voter intimidation charges by the Department of Justice. The Hill reports requests by Congress have been ignored. The charges were dismissed, in accordance with the platform of the New Black Panther Party, which is demanding dismissal of all criminal charges against all blacks currently held anywhere for any reason.
Holder may be confident no major media outlet will cover the story. Perhaps Holder's teasing threats to investigate the Bush administration for torture would look less threatening if his inconsistency were reported. Are the New Black Panthers less of a threat than Guantanamo detainees? One of the accused intimidators was Malik Shabazz, National Chairman, The New Black Panther Party.
...While at Howard University, Shabazz came under the influence of Minister Louis Farrakhan and Dr. Khallid Abdul Muhammad...Minister Louis Farrakhan and Dr. Khallid Muhammad had a heavy influence on the young Shabazz while an undergraduate and law student...Served as National Co-convener and National Executive Committee Member of the Hon. Louis Farrakhan’s 2005 Millions More Movement...
Dr. Malik Zulu Shabazz, Esquire's bio links the New Black Panther's directly to the notorious Dr. Louis Farrakhan. President Obama and Eric Holder must have reasons for dismissing the voter intimidation charges against the New Black Panthers. One might speculate based on the platform featured on the web site of the New Black Panther Party.
We want freedom for all Black Men and Black Women held in international, military, federal, state, county, city jails and prisons. We believe that all Black People and people of color should be released from the many jails and prisons because they have not received a fair and impartial trial. ‘Released’ means ‘released’ to the lawful authorities of the Black Nation.
Perhaps the mainstream media could take a look at the reasons why the Department of Justice voter intimidation charges against the New Black Panther Party were dismissed. Perhaps this is a new strategy? How can DOJ pursue the Bush administration's torture policy and ignore the New Black Panther Party's voter intimidation tactics?
Which is potentially more dangerous, torturing terrorists or intimidating voters? The answer is not forthcoming from Obama's jerky policy enforcer, Attorney General Eric Holder.
For more info: http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/gop-holder-battle-over-new-black-panthers-2009-07-12.html, http://www.newblackpanther.com/attymalik.html, http://www.newblackpanther.com/platform.html
Comments
Watch yourself Jan. Need to be very cautious on how you address The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan and The Nation of Islam
Your Father: Thank you for taking a moment to comment and express concern. Yes, my editors have received cease and desist orders, and threats from competitive bloggers mostly. Generally, my strategy is to be completely visible and transparent (really, not fake). Before the widespread use of the internet, during the days of the old media, my adversaries were successful defining me with threats, rumors and misinformation. It would take a very cheeky Eric Holder, Farakhan or Obama to Palinize me today. Besides, they're expending all their energy and ammunition on her! I'm too small potatoes now (that's one of the ways adversaries used to dismiss me, now I define myself that way!) I consider them all girly men any way, easy to fight.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!