As a veteran SFUSD parent and observer of school issues, I read the San Francisco Grand Jury’s report on San Francisco's public school assignment process, “San Francisco Kindergarten Admissions - Back to the Drawing Board,” and felt it called for a detailed critique. Despite an apparently exhaustive research process, the report indicates a dismaying lack of comprehension about many aspects of the situation.
I agree with the report’s finding that the Diversity Index aspect of the assignment process is “unnecessarily complex and confusing … (and) alienating to … families,” and that it fails to deliver a diversified school population. And yes, I agree that a good neighborhood school is the ideal situation for a family.
However, I disagree with the implicit conclusions that scrapping the Diversity Index would significantly change the situation. The frustrations families experience due to more applicants than openings at popular schools are not caused by the Diversity Index and will still exist under any process.
I also strongly disagree with the implication that returning to neighborhood assignment would miraculously improve the assignment process and the schools. SFUSD is a far more successful school district in many ways – including achievement and school diversity – than many other diverse urban school districts with neighborhood-based assignment processes. That fact alone belies the magical-thinking notion that neighborhood schools are a panacea. A diverse urban school district with many high-need students cannot be compared to a homogenous, high-income suburban school district where neighborhood school assignment is a smooth and simple process.
In one baffling comment, the report states: “For 20% of the parents to have made Attendance Area Schools their first choice seems to the Jury to be a strong endorsement for the idea of neighborhood schools.” The 20% figure refers to the number of kindergarten applicants who list their local school as their first choice (actually 18%, according to SFUSD). Yet that figure is astoundingly low, meaning that a huge majority – 82% -- of parents do NOT rank their neighborhood school as their first choice. It’s incomprehensible that the Grand Jurors interpreted that figure as an endorsement of neighborhood assignment over a choice system.
The many areas in which the Grand Jury report reveals lack of comprehension of and poor-quality research into aspects of SFUSD operations motivated me to produce a detailed critique. It's for serious wonks and is way too long to post here, so I've posted it on the www.sfschools.org blog.
Comments
I found the Civil Grand Jury Report to be quite interesting, enlightening and quite on the mark. What exactly do you have against kids going to their neighborhood schools? They can be an anchor in a community -that is usually the case in most communities, a place for families to use a resource, to recognize as a place for the kids to go and thrive. It seems to me that the practice of avoiding neighborhood schools has been a factor in preventing African American students to do better in school. When you don't live near a school it is harder to be involved. Being involved with your kid's education is right up there in terms of ensuring that your child will succeed.
Previous commenter - I don't understand this statement:
"It seems to me that the practice of avoiding neighborhood schools has been a factor in preventing African American students to do better in school."
What? You only have to look to Oakland to see that a neighborhood school policy does not automatically lift all schools. It does the opposite which is to trap them in environments where issues surrounding poverty overwhelm any attempts by educators to improve the schools.
Wow, I haven't read the report, but the example you gave really makes me question the research and handling of this report. If 18% is a strong endorsement, then I wonder what the jurors think 82% is?
tLbkov <a href="http://vjuzqahepwfm.com/">vjuzqahepwfm</a>, [url=http://akajbnbijgfs.com/]akajbnbijgfs[/url], [link=http://djfmsvctbfks.com/]djfmsvctbfks[/link], http://lydwdmppxngi.com/
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!