.jpg)
Photo: americaholds.blogspot.com
Are the masses in our country going to just keep allowing lawlessness from our leaders? Are we struggling so hard to put food on our tables, play video games and watch sporting events that the majority does not even care about demanding that our leaders either obey the law of our land or step down from their posts?
I had held off on writing this article but It is way past time to point out the obvious. Even if we put aside all the reasons why the man in our White House should not have ever had the privilege of being there, there is one simple thing that can not be denied. There is a very good reason why the man in our White House is the first and only President of the United States to ever also become the President of the UN Security Council. All the wonderful praise from the national media rejoicing ignorantly the celebration of lawlessness was enough to make my stomach turn. Even if you are not familiar with our Constitution, did it not seem odd that he is the only one in history to hold such a post? If not, let me direct you to Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution:
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States. And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign state.
You can not serve two masters. Our admitted Constitutional Scholar in the White House certainly knows this. I submit, that is why he is the first one to have the audacity to accept such a title from the UN. Likewise, our Congress should know that all their emoluments received by foreign states to fill their re-election coffers and influence their votes are also against the law. All the crooks need to step down. If we do not demand it, then we deserve the kind of government that we are experiencing.
Last time I checked, they did not start taxing our right to get really angry. Before they do, I suggest we all start making some noise before it is too late.
Comments
When writing make sure you spell check so that you don't sound even crazier.
I am thoroughly enjoying this kind of intellectual drivel. I am actually enjoying every second of Obama's presidency because I know that is driving you craaaazy. Looking forward to 7 more years. Just precious.
From Wikipedia on 1/02/10:
The role of president of the Security Council involves setting the agenda, presiding at its meetings and overseeing any crisis. The President is authorized to issue both presidential statements (subject to consensus among Council members) and notes,[5][6] which are used to make declarations of intent that the full Security Council can then pursue.[6] The Presidency rotates monthly in alphabetical order of the Security Council member nations' names in English and is held by China for the month of January 2010.
If this is true, other US presidents have held this position, so what is all the frigin fuss?
Does the UN qualify as a "King, Prince or foreign state." ?
The UN is not a King, Prince or Foreign State. Might want to calm down a little bit and stop pretending you don't have any of your freedoms any more. It's pathetic and lowly.
Lol
And here I thought this was going to be about putting people in jail for possession, weapons violations, abusing their spouses, multiple DUIs, rampant fraud, corruption, bribery, insider trading, and all that other stuff we can't seem to make stick to anyone of higher office than Notary Public.
You wrote, "Even if we put aside all the reasons why the man in our White House should not have ever had the privilege of being there..." and I'm not sure what you meant to accomplish by making such a vague statement... unless you just put it there to try and rile up the tea-bagger/birther mo-tards.
The United Nations is not a "King, Prince, or foreign state."
What a pointless, f*cking article! Was there a point?
So according to the US Constitution no born-again Christian can be President as they have sworn alligence to the "King of King."
I hope you get over your writers block soon.
"Are the masses in our country going to just keep allowing lawlessness from our leaders?"
Yes.
Too Adorable. I didn't know Obama was He Who Must Not Be Named. I have to admit that when she was talking about how the 'man in the white house' didn't deserve to be there I checked the date to see if it was written during W's disastrous stolen presidencies.
Didn't pay much attention in History class, did we?
Everything you you say was not only a potential known by our founding fathers, but was, in fact, predicted to occur within 100 years.
Eternal Vigilance is the Price of Liberty. Most people are pretty darn lazy. And with good reason. The standard of living among the worst segment of the American population is still better than 90% of the global population.
That is, of course, going to change.
Ok. So. You are angry. Tell us what *you* are doing about it.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!