We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 54°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

Will health care reform take away my freedom to choose - Ronald Reagan says... yes


President Ronald "Dutch" Reagan

On the Friday morning Glenn Beck radio program, the host played an audio clip of Ronald Regan speaking about nationalizing healthcare in the 1960's.  The clip was sent to Glenn by a listener, a “constitutional watchdog”, which illustrates that every single one of us has something to add and does, despite the almost overwhelming feeling of helplessness, have the power to make a difference.

Instead of addressing only whether the right to choose your own doctor would be affected by nationalized health care, Reagan illustrated that many more than just that guaranteed right would be lost - and using the measure of history, he is correct.

In Reagan’s speech, he referenced a quote from the socialist and former six-time presidential candidate, Norman Matoon Thomas.  

Thomas said, “The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.”  Although Thomas was quoted in 1927, many of us waking up to the encroaching juggernaut of our socialist government must realize just how correct he was in his prediction.

Reagan’s ability to convey the true danger in inception of nationalized health care plan was presented by him in a classically non political way.  In stark contrast to today’s political implementation of corporate speak, Reagan states the facts, the danger, and the potential outcome, and offers an action plan in a clear, concise and straight-forward way.

Reading Reagan’s words leaves the reader in realization of “just how lacking we are today of politicians who truly get it.”   Reagan understood how socialism would slowly, but steadily creep into society and also knew that government management of health care was a traditional means of stealthily supplanting socialism into that society.

Wake up.  It’s our society now; it’s our turn to defend our country with the means afforded to us in the constitution.  Heed Reagan’s word, write, email, call or visit your representative now because there may not be a second chance.

“Now back in 1927 an American socialist, Norman Thomas, six times candidate for president on the Socialist Party ticket, said the American people would never vote for socialism. But he said under the name of liberalism the American people will adopt every fragment of the socialist program.

There are many ways in which our government has invaded the precincts of private citizens, the method of earning a living. But at the moment I'd like to talk about another way because this trip is with us and at the moment is more imminent.

One of the traditional methods of imposing statism or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine. It’s very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project. Most people are a little reluctant to oppose anything that suggests medical care for people who possibly can't afford it.

Now, the American people, if you put it to them about socialized medicine and gave them a chance to choose, would unhesitatingly vote against it. We had an example of this. Under the Truman administration it was proposed that we have a compulsory health insurance program for all people in the United States, and, of course, the American people unhesitatingly rejected this.

So with the American people on record as not wanting socialized medicine, Congressman Ferrand said, if we can only break through and get our foot inside the door, they can we can expand the program after that. Well, let's see what the socialists themselves had to say about it. They say once the Ferrand bill is passed, this nation will be provided with a mechanism for socialized medicine capable of indefinite expansion in every direction until it includes the entire population. Well, we can't say we haven't been warned.

James Madison in 1788, speaking to the Virginia Convention said: “Since the general civilization of mankind, I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpations.”

Now in our country under our free enterprise system, we have seen medicine reach the greatest heights that it has in any country in the world. Today, the relationship between patient and doctor in this country is something to be envied any place. The privacy, the care that is given to a person, the right to chose a doctor, the right to go from one doctor to the other.

But let’s also look from the other side, at the freedom the doctor loses. A doctor would be reluctant to say this. Well, like you, I am only a patient, so I can say it in his behalf. The doctor begins to lose freedoms; it’s like telling a lie, and one leads to another. First you decide that the doctor can have so many patients. They are equally divided among the various doctors by the government. But then the doctors aren’t equally divided geographically, so a doctor decides he wants to practice in one town and the government has to say to him you can’t live in that town, they already have enough doctors. You have to go someplace else. And from here it is only a short step to dictating where he will go.

This is a freedom that I wonder whether any of us have the right to take from any human being.

In this country of ours, took place the greatest revolution that has ever taken place in world’s history. The only true revolution. Every other revolution simply exchanged one set of rulers for another. But here for the first time in all the thousands of years of man’s relation to man, a little group of the men, the founding fathers for the first time – established the idea that you and I had within ourselves the God given right and ability to determine our own destiny.

This freedom was built into our government with safeguards. We talk democracy today. And strangely we let democracy begin to assume the aspect of majority rule is all that is needed. Well, majority rule is a fine aspect of democracy, provided there are guarantees written in to our government concerning the rights of the individual and of the minorities.

What can we do about this? Well, you and I can do a great deal. We can say right now that we want no further encroachment on these individual liberties and freedoms and that you demand the continuation of our traditional free enterprise system. You and I can do this. The only way we can do it is by writing to our congressmen, even if we believe that he's on our side to begin with, write to strengthen his hand. Write those letters now. Call your friends and tell them to write. If you don't, this program, I promise you, will pass just as surely as the sun will come up tomorrow. And behind it will come other federal programs that will invade every area of freedom as we have known it in this country... until one day as Norman Thomas said, we will awake to find that we have socialism. And if you don't do this and if I don't do it, one of these days you and I are going to spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it once was like in America when men were free.”

Far more than the right to choose your own physician could be lost with today's versions of health care reform.  Far more than your right to fight for life at age 70, your ability to see your doctor in a timely fashion for that suspicious mole or your choice to get that MR, Xray or CAT scan, radiation or chemo. 

When we allow the government to manage our health care, manage our health, we give them the power to place a value on medical proceedures, on wait times to recieve those proceedures and worse to assess the value of human life througout its cycle - the right to choose who lives or dies.

What liberty can we protect, what freedom can we retain, if our government has taken control of our right to choose the very way we keep ourselves health or keep ourselves alive?  Does any right preceed the very personal choice of care or more importantly how much our life is worth?  I would argue that when we give that right to the government all other seconday or terciary rights become theirs for the taking. 

The corporatization of the American government has occurred and with current health care reform legislation will be bought up and the non-functional parts of the busness, the "toxic" or costly aspects will be eliminated.  

What we must remember is the dilligent struggle of our parents and our grandparents to preserve these liberties.  Bear in mind that our forefathers, the writers of the constitution expressed that we “the people” have the right to, and must, protect liberty.  

In their time, ordinary people such as your neighbor, your father, mother, brother, sister, and so on, defended personal freedoms with clear language.  They fought with knowledge and if need be they fought with words, rakes scythes or hoes if called to.

We the American people are the only constitutional protectors of liberty and self evident truths.  If you are reading this, you are part of that “we”.  Call your congressman and senator – today.  

 

 

Advertisement

By

Pittsburgh Conservative Examiner

Josh Geldrich is a freelance writer and long-time conservative who has been involved in politics in Pittsburgh and nationally since the mid...

Comments

  • Brutus 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    That's absolutely true. Too bad not enough folks heard this recording during the healthcare debate.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...