The new E5-type bullet train - AP Photo, Kyodo News
Related Articles
Debated for years, finally here
For those of us Pittsburghers with a half decent memory, the word “Maglev” can stir recollections of politically inspired empty promises and immensely fast bullet trains stoppable only by government funding quagmires fueled by a conservative citizenry understanding that mass transit, while sustainable, does not hold mass appeal.
With President Obama now in the Whitehouse, it looks as though Pittsburgh will finally receive its own high-speed rail connector. The Pittsburgh connecter represents one of two points in the Keystone Corridor, which is one of eleven transportation corridors identified by the congressional Transportation and Infrastructure committee as being of significance to commuters.
The keystone Corridor connects Philadelphia to Pittsburgh and will utilize high speed Maglev train technology conveying passengers at speeds of 300mph and more. At this rate commuters would be able to reach Philadelphia from Pittsburgh or Pittsburgh to Philadelphia in an hour or less.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 designated $8 billion to be utilized for high-speed rail development, the President has proposed an additional $5 billion in his most recent budget, and in addition, Jim Oberstar, Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee released the full text of the Transportation Authorization Act of 2009. The 775-page document released last week calls for an additional $50 billion over six years for high-speed intercity passenger rail development in the designated corridors.
Placing Pittsburgh back on the map
One Transportation and Infrastructure committee member, Pittsburgher and US House Representative Jason Altmire (D-McCandless), in a hearing held today by the House Subcommittee on Railroads said that he will push to have a Pittsburgh-to-Cleveland line added to a national list of high-speed rail corridors.
During the hearing, Congressman Altmire offered his opinion that a Cleveland to Pittsburgh connector should be included as a designated corridor, expressing that the Pittsburgh to Cleveland connector is the “missing link” in the national plan and according to the Pittsburgh Post Gazette, further elucidated that, if created, this connector would establish Pittsburgh as the hub of a network stretching across the upper Midwest.
Altmire’s proposal on the Pittsburgh/Cleveland connector was submitted for inclusion in the Transportation Authorization Act that will come before the Congress this year.
The designated high-speed corridors are:
1. Northeast Corridor
2. The California Corridor
3. The Pacific Northwest Corridor
4. The South Central Corridor
5. Gulf Coast Corridor
6. Chicago Hub Corridor
7. Florida Corridor
8. Southeast Corridor
9. Keystone Corridor
10. Empire Corridor
11. Northern New England Corridor
The U.S. Department of Transportation’s illustration below shows the magnitude of the high-speed rail corridor project.
Photo US Department of Transportation
All that it’s cracked up to be?
The project is historic in its size and scope, but he overall bill includes much more than the high-speed railway proposals and is sure to expand commerce for many and significantly curtail freedom for others, begging the question; is it truly the legislation we want?
As with most recent Democrat initiatives as of late, the $500 billion dollar legislation opens the door for many guidelines and limitations that will expand rights for some and severely curtail rights of the greater majority of individuals.
One of the areas in question in the proposed legislation is the formation of an “Office of Livability”. In it’s twenty-page summation of the Office of Livability, the proposed bill begins by laying out the case against the American way of life: “Since the creation of the Interstate System, American surface transportation has been defined by the use of personal motor vehicles. The focus on automobiles has afforded Americans increased mobility and interconnectivity; yet has also lead to increased congestion, higher greenhouse gas emissions, and a reduced focus on other modes of surface transportation.”
The act follows the shift that started with reauthorization of the ISTEA which began changing federal fuel taxes from a user fee into a general-purpose transportation tax in 1991. This general purpose tax revenue would be usable by Congress for whatever purpose it determines significant.
Pittsburgh should be wary of this proposal insofar as that the language of the bill opens the door to limit personal freedom dramatically. The act decrees metropolitan transportation plans are to be devised using “smart growth” principles, while targeting reductions in use of “single occupant vehicles” It also imposes what amounts to federal land restrictions to protect “valuable farmlands” in urban regions, and increasing “livable communities”, so if you know anyone who has had their family farm or homestead designated a wetland, ask them how they dealt with it, because you’re next.
Think twice
Pittsburgh-ers show their heart and determination here in the city of champions in how they support their sports teams and through uniquely strong family bonds. We do not take kindly to limitation of personal freedoms.
The bill sets new precedent for government expansion in control of transportation and limitation of freedom. It provides the above listed and many more regulations as part of the “California Smart-Growth” model and it will be imposed on urban areas large than 100,000 people. Remember that greater Pittsburgh (Greater) ranks somewhere around twentieth in the united states in this department. Bear in mind that the Federal Government knows this and if possible will find a way to impose the California model on our region.
So, before you jump on the High-speed Altmire train, bear in mind that it comes with a higher price-tag than just $500 billion, a higher price tag than just an unfunded mandate to be paid back by your children and grand children. It is a huge government expansion that affects Pittsburgh directly and whose costs are reduction of personal freedoms such as; how often you drive, where you drive to, what route you take to get there, it restricts your ability to build that fence in your back yard and even the retaining wall needed to keep the hillside from sliding into your home.
Comments
What you deem as curbs on 'freedom' might be seen as improvements in standard of living by a majority of Americans. Also, you call the Surface Transportation Authorization Act of 2009 a 'Dem' proposal, but it is bipartisan in nature, especially since Rep. John Mica (R-FL) wrote a lot of the language in the bill as it stands right now.
But go ahead and obfuscate and falsify to meet your agenda.
"As with most recent Democrat initiatives as of late, the $500 billion dollar legislation opens the door for many guidelines and limitations that will expand rights for some and severely curtail rights of the greater majority of individuals."
This plan is a boondoggle and colossal waste of money!! I will cost 5 trillion to complete and do you know about the estimates of the big dig in Boston!
This is Amtrak on Super STUPID Steroids !!!
The complete system is a massive burden on future Americans that will force the Babyboomers into the lowest standard of living in the West.
LEXSLAMMAN-You are absolutely correct, it is a case of one mans ceiling being another mans floor.
But regardless of which politician wrote which percentage of the bill, I think we can both agree that bipartisanship in legislation does not guarantee non-intrusive, non-progressive laws or expenditures.
Any person who wishes to see the facts can see that it would be pretty hard to obfuscate the actual language of the bill when there is a direct link posted to the bill itself.
Please let me say that I understand where you're coming from living about an hour away from the Louisville connector this legislation would provide much growth for not only your area, but many others as well.
It's just a matter of what you'll give in trade for that prosperity. I know people who have had their homes taken through eminent domain, and also those who have had the majority of their farms put off limits(designated wetlands).
This is a conservative column, expressing conservative opinions - S
PAUL,
Bravo! you nailed it.
Vice president Biden, during a roundtable discussion with Transportation Secretary, Ray La Hood and several US Governors, said that he thought it would take a lot more than $8 billion to construct.
The cost just to construct a system such as this will indeed be in the trillions of dollars, but the bigger question is how much will it cost to operate?
That will depend on who operates it, and figuring out who will operate it is an easy one...
The same people who operate AMTRAK will operate it - The government - There's a winner.
Can you say "bleeding money" boys and girls?
Kudos Paul, thanks for reading.
I apologize Paul, I meant to address my comment to Josh.
One last point though: WE NEED NEW INFRASTRUCTURE.
Urban public transportation is in dire need of a new and extensive metro system. Also, Pittsburgh WILL only benefit if residents can get from here to Philly in under an hour.
Finally, one can get from the very north of France to the very south in about 2 hours-- why shouldn't we in America enjoy the same comforts, luxuries, and ease of commerce?
I will leave with a question:
If your roof is leaking because it is old and filled with holes do you replace it? Yes. Sometimes things need repaired, but beyond a certain point they need to be replace.
If your refrigerator did not work you would be forced to purchase a new one.
In the same way, AMERICA needs to replace some of its infrastructure.
ALEXANDER, I agree that we do indeed need improvements in infrastructure both regionally and nationally as well for several reasons.
Would you agree with legislation that kills a baby seal for each gas guzzling SUV taken off the road? OK, how about if you get $50 for each seal killed as well? How about if you found out this deal doesn't do what it's supposed do?
My point is threefold; 1. Exchanging freedom for commerce is a dead end. 2. The bill discourages roadways and shifts emphasis to intermodal forms transit. 3. Private enterprise should do it.
I agree with the investment in a high-speed national rail system. I do however take umbrage with the fact that this legislation takes away rights of the individual, and is not an economically sound proposal.
If it were, why hasn’t anyone built a Philly/Pittsburgh connector already?
ALEXANDER, Regarding your question; While I would count on the government to set guidelines for minimum standards for commercial contractors, if my roof is leaking, I would be a fool to believe that the government would replace it efficiently or so that it functions in its expected manner.
Can you give me an example of an efficiently run government railroad? GSEs by design cannot function as efficiently as private enterprise.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!