We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 47°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

What happened to the energy crisis?


British Petroleum's Thunder Horse drilling platform helps to supply the lifeblood of our civilization - oil and gas.  Photo/BP Corp.

It was less than a year ago when gasoline prices hovered near four dollars per gallon and the entire nation was in an uproar over “energy policy.” Now, even though gasoline prices have climbed more than 50% from their levels at the beginning of the year, not a whisper is heard about what the government is doing to solve the supply problems.

The federal government is doing what it has been doing since the oil shortages of the 1970s – absolutely nothing. One of the promises made by His Holiness the Dali Obama during his ascendancy was that he was going to personally make America energy independent. In his coronation speech before the assembled multitudes at the Democratic National Convention last year, he said, “I will tap our natural gas reserves, invest in clean coal technology, and find ways to safely harness nuclear power. I'll help our auto companies re-tool, so that the fuel-efficient cars of the future are built right here in America. I'll make it easier for the American people to afford these new cars. And I'll invest 150 billion dollars [of other people’s money] over the next decade in affordable, renewable sources of energy - wind power and solar power and the next generation of biofuels…”

Well he has spent the money, but we are producing no more oil than we did before. President Obama has spoken eloquently about his vision of a green utopia, where windmills provide all the power needs of the entire nation, and automobiles run on clean fuel made from grass. Unfortunately for the president and his environmentalist supporters, our entire civilization rests upon an uninterrupted and abundant supply of oil, coal, and natural gas. Without it, we would have no electricity, central heating, running water, cars, trucks, airplanes, ships, factories, waterproof clothing, soda bottles, safety glass, sterile food and medical containers, air conditioners, televisions, microwave ovens, X-Boxes, I-Pods, or any of the millions of other products made using power generated from the burning of fossil fuels.

Even though it is not the proper role for the federal government, conducting research into alternative sources of energy is wise. However, in the meantime it would also be prudent to take steps to ensure our survival and standard of living by increasing the supply of the fuels we require now.

President Obama however, is in fact taking steps to ensure that the supply does not increase. In one of his first acts in office, his Interior Department secretary, Ken Salazar, blocked to the opening of the outer continental shelf to oil exploration. This move, according to the Interior Department’s own numbers, denies Americans access to more than ten billion barrels of oil and 45 trillion cubic feet of natural gas – enough to replace twelve years of Middle East oil imports and heat 60 million homes for ten years.

The increase in supply would also most likely reduce the price of these fuels, resulting in a tremendous boost to the economy, a reduction in overall consumer prices, lower utility bills, and cheaper gas at the pump.

Make no mistake – Obama and his allies have no interest in making this nation energy independent by using the technology at hand; fossil fuels and nuclear power. He has raised the gas mileage requirements for American auto makers, which will result in higher-priced and less-safe cars. The Democrats are pushing their trillion-dollar carbon tax (euphemistically referred to as “cap and trade”) that will cause skyrocketing utility bills for consumers and create upward price pressure on nearly everything we buy. Government environmental regulations have prevented critical refineries from being constructed for more than thirty years. The president knows perfectly well that windmills and biofuels cannot significantly reduce our need for oil and gas, but he intends to impose his green hell on us in the name of saving the planet from the discredited farce called global warming, and creating “green-collar jobs”.

This nation is one major catastrophe, terrorist attack, or Middle Eastern war away from $7 per gallon gasoline and $400 per month household electric bills. If Iran gets the atomic bomb and attacks Israel, or if Israel preemptively strikes Iran, the entire region could be consumed in a cataclysm that would bring oil production to a standstill. Terrorists could work with the active pirates in the Straits of Malacca and off the coast of Somalia to sink oil tankers in the straits and the Suez Canal, causing massive disruptions in the delivery of crude oil. Natural disasters or terrorists could damage or destroy the limited refining capacity in the United States, impairing supplies for years while new refineries are built.

Our modern and comfortable way of life rests upon these tenuous sea lines of communication and a handful of oil refineries, and our government is actively working to prevent the production of American oil and natural gas, thereby guaranteeing continued dependency on foreign suppliers. The energy crisis of last year has not been resolved, it is merely in remission and it will be back – count on it.
 

Advertisement

By

NY Conservative Examiner

Todd Keister is a former U.S. Navy Intelligence Specialist for the Defense Intelligence Agency and a veteran police commander. Todd is also an...

Comments

  • Dacia Nichol 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Aww man - you mean everyone else doesn't deal with a $400 per month electric bill at least every winter? Man...I need to get out of New York! Lol.

    Not that I agree with Penn & Teller on most things, but I think they did a pretty great segment on Nuclear Power...You Tube search it (because I can't post links here, lol).

    Nice article!!

  • Todd Keister 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Thanks Dacia. How many "green collar workers" and windmills would it take to equal the output of one nuclear power plant?

  • Rmoen 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    I got as far as 'His Holiness the Dali Obama' then lost interest. I'm so tired of name calling.

  • Todd Keister 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    You mean names like George Bush was called for 8 years? Liar, loser, war criminal, nazi, idiot... "his holiness" doesn't really compete...

  • William Ernest Schenewerk, Ph.D. 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    In 1960 oil could be had FOB in New York Harbor for 25 cents/barrel. Party was over in 1974. Since then energy has been a proxy for left-wing and very-far-left politics. Organized labor wants to force us back to rail transportation. The very-far-left envision a North Korean economy, when them in charge. Result of all this is that nukes get trashed and useless "renewable energy" gets all the attention.
    World energy requirement is equivalent to 5 TW now, rising to ~40 TW by 2095. 45,500 nukes can do this. Nothing else can. Except geothermal, "renewable energy" requires more than 1 kg steel/W to get 24 h/365 day power. This is 40 years worth of world steel production. Each GWe wet geothrmal produces a cubic nautical mile of hypersaline effluent per year. 45,500 GWe geothermal will kill all sea life. Build nukes or put Kim Jung Un in charge.

  • Wisco 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Sure, full steam ahead. But then what? After the OC oil is gone, what do we tap? Do we have enough water for our nuclear plants (ask people in Georgia what it's like to have droughts forcing you to choose between water uses)?

    Have you considered that our "modern comfortable" lifestyle is about as sustainable as a cocaine addiction?

  • Dacia Nichol 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Perhaps the fact that 80% of all energy sources that we use also have a need for water to operate...the renewable ones being the only ones that shut down in a water shortage (nuclear just lowers production)...is a fact being overlooked to demonize nuclear power. Is it not possible to take the water issue into account and incorporate that into the plant's design? You know...kind of how cars can be built as more fuel-efficient, nuclear plants can be built to be more water-efficient. My gamble is on science.

  • Jondoh 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Just because people stop complaining doesn't mean it's not a problem anymore. Energy is still a problem.

    Diversification from fossil fules is smart even if returns are not as good.

    Author needs to understand that energy independence is just not going to happen in the US. The US uses 25% of the worlds energy. Last time I checked, there were more than 4 countries on the planet. The easy oil is almost gone. Only a fool will believe that a little more investment in our own fossil fuels will result in a windfall production.

  • Benjamin 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Don't fool yourself, neither political party is interested in making America energy independent. Both sides bottom line is controlling the masses and steering us toward the end.

  • Bruno 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Dear Todd. given your political affiliation I understand your bias. picking up on one of your statement, I do not see the issue with american cars becoming as efficient as european or japanese ones. they would become lighter in the process but no less safe and this would result in the US saving a fair share of current oil imports... what is wrong with this simple win-win concept?

  • Paul Gasconete 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Mr. Todd, you might want to do more research and background study before publishing further articles in the near future. There is no logic, just pure anecdotal statements.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...