We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 50°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

Science, facts, fraud, and "Climategate"


The AGW Myth: An increase in the average temperature of the Earth's atmosphere, especially a sustained increase great enough to cause changes in the global climate. The Earth has experienced numerous episodes of global warming through its history, and currently appears to be undergoing such warming. The present warming is generally attributed to an increase in the greenhouse effect, brought about by increased levels of greenhouse gases, largely due to the effects of human industry and agriculture. Expected long-term effects of current global warming are rising sea levels, flooding, melting of polar ice caps and glaciers, fluctuations in temperature and precipitation, more frequent and stronger El Niños and La Niñas, drought, heat waves, and forest fires.Image Credit: The Minority Report- 33ERF8GGRPCH

Science, facts, fraud, and "Climategate"

What are we to believe? ... what are we to believe?

Is nothing sacred anymore?

The simple answer was spoken by Ronald Reagan in his negotiations with the USSR during the run-up to the end of the "Cold War" ... "trust, but verify"!

Last week, it was discovered to what lengths the science based community (and economy) would go to protect what it held on to most dearly ... the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW).

The conspiracy that was propping up this expensive world CONTROL (Copenhagen) gimmick --- has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka CRU) and released 61 megabytes of confidential files onto the internet.
(ht: Watts Up With That)

These exposed hacked emails, exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory, suggest conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organized resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.

One of the alleged emails has a gentle gloat over the death in 2004 of John L Daly (one of the first climate change skeptics, founder of the Still Waiting For Greenhouse site), commenting:

“In an odd way this is cheering news.”

The Gore effect in its full glory: The subject of climate change (formerly known as ‘Global Warming‘ until the planet refused to cooperate) is highly controversial and considered a ‘religion’ in some European circles. This climate change concept has now been exposed as a mass fraud perpetrated to gain money, power, and control over all human activity. Image Credit: CapnBob.us

This excerpted and edited from Pajamas Media -

Climategate: Alarmism Is Underpinned by Fraud (PJM Exclusive)
November 25, 2009 - by Ian Plimer - Pajamas Media

In the geological past, there have been six major ice ages. During five of these six ice ages, the atmospheric carbon dioxide content was higher than at present. It is clear that the colorless, odorless, non-poisonous gas called carbon dioxide did not drive past climates. Carbon dioxide is plant food, not a pollutant.
----
In the 600-year long Roman Warming, it was 4ºC warmer than now. Sea level did not rise and ice sheets did not disappear. The Dark Ages followed, and starvation, disease, and depopulation occurred. The Medieval Warming followed the Dark Ages, and for 400 years it was 5ºC warmer. Sea level did not rise and the ice sheets remained. The Medieval Warming was followed by the Little Ice Age, which finished in 1850. It is absolutely no surprise that temperature increased after a cold period.

Unless I have missed something, I am not aware of heavy industry, coal-fired power stations, or SUVs in the 1,000 years of Roman and Medieval Warmings.
----
There was warming from 1860 to 1880, 1910 to 1940, and 1976 to 1998, with intervening periods of cooling. The only time when temperature rise paralleled carbon dioxide emissions was 1976-1998. The other warmings and coolings in the last 150 years were unrelated to carbon dioxide emissions.

Something is seriously wrong. To argue that humans change climate requires abandoning all we know about history, archaeology, geology, astronomy, and solar physics. This is exactly what has been done.

The answer to this enigma was revealed last week. It is fraud.

Files from the UK Climatic Research Unit were hacked. They show that data was massaged, numbers were fudged, diagrams were biased, there was destruction of data after freedom of information requests, and there was refusal to submit taxpayer-funded data for independent examination.

Data was manipulated to show that the Medieval Warming didn’t occur, and that we are not in a period of cooling. Furthermore, the warming of the 20th century was artificially inflated.

This behavior is that of criminals and all the data from the UK Hadley Centre and the US GISS must now be rejected. These crooks perpetrated these crimes at the expense of the British and U.S. taxpayers.

The same crooks control the IPCC and the fraudulent data in IPCC reports. The same crooks meet in Copenhagen next week and want 0.7% of the Western world’s GDP to pass through an unelected UN government, and then on to sticky fingers in the developing world.

You should be angry. Very angry.
Reference Here>>

We, at LA Conservative Examiner, say Pull The Plug!

Pull the plug on almost every (public and private) expensive, well meaning, based on fraud CO2 reduction "EXCHANGE" (read that as Cap & Trade/Carbon Credit) program that exists. Investigate Al Gore and others who have profited greatly on this public money supported science enterprise and SCAM. Pull the plug on all activity envisioned through accords reached and projected through meetings previously in Kyoto and Copenhagen next month!

Let us all demand that the Science community gets back to establishing tested scientific FACT ... and thereby, get its truth back ... while we demand a refund on all of our tax money that has been spent (fleeced) on this concept and myth of Anthropogenic Global Warming - let us demand our money back!

Krauthammer's Take  
National Review Online Staff, Friday, November 27, 2009

From Wednesday's Fox News All-Star Panel - Comments of Charles Krauthammer:

"The global warming science is not junk science, but it's speculative. It's based on incomplete data. It's based on computer models that rest on assumptions — that, in turn, rest on an understanding of how the globe’s climate controls itself — that [are] extremely incomplete.

So its projections are speculative. But it pretends that, of course, that it is the hardest of all sciences and anybody who is skeptical is a denier — using a term used normally about the Holocaust, which is of course an event that actually happened as opposed to projections in global warming, which are speculative science.

So what you see in the [leaked global-warming] emails are people that are on somewhat shaky grounds. It is not as if there is no science at all in this, but there is contradictory evidence, such as the flattening of the rise in temperatures, which they cannot explain.

And their response is either suppression or manipulation or, even worse, the delegitimation of — the personal attacks on — skeptics in an attempt to write them out of the journals, to get them fired, and all kinds of nasty stuff. … It puts a lot of their research in question."
Reference Here>>

Additional Video Expose Assets>>

Advertisement

By

LA Conservative Examiner

Edmund Jenks is the Managing Editor of five Weblogs: MAXINE, Symblogogy , Oblate Spheroid, ...

Comments

  • Edmund Jenks 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    I love this stuff ... did you hear about Ed Begley Jr.on TV with Stuart Varney? ... he nuked, he was spitting and fuming and blowing a gasket trying to defend this FRAUD!

    Begley stated that "Peer Review" is the key ... what an idiot ... the whole problem with Global Warming studies is that "Peer Review" was controlled by these people who were trying to convenience us all that they need more money to keep proving the FRAUD they were perpetrating in the FIRST place.

    This whole area of study (AGW) is a political enterprise based on getting public money as opposed to a science-based enterprise based upon to pursuit of FACTS!

    Is anyone willing to invest in a "Carbon Offset" right about now? There will be people and Corporations like Al Gore's Generation Investment Management private equity fund, which has taken a 9.5 percent stake in a company that has one of the largest carbon credit portfolios in the world, that will be looking to liquidate very soon.

  • Roger 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    It is about time that people see that Al Gore knows nothing about Global Warming and is trying to pull something on the World! Here is something he said in an interview with Grist Mag. May 9 2006 "I believe it is approprate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous (Global Warming) is. Wake up people!

  • ehmoran 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Amazing!

    The data (emails) are right in your face and you still refuse to see the evidence.

    These same scientists threatened my job as a scientist with the US Geological Survey because I attempted to publish a study showing with higher confidence that global temperature changes were completely natural caused solely by Earth's physical processes.

    Additionally, these same scientists would not even discuss or refute the science and facts presented. Instead, they took two days to personally attacked me and my family.

    I always knew that when man-made global climate change was showed to be insignificant that people would lose faith, note the word "FAITH", in science. But this event and exposure is way worse for the science community as a whole. Remember: "Truth is the daughter of Time (Francis Bacon)".
    Several USGS scientists got fired for the same thing when discussing data manipulation for models developed for the Nevada Nuclear Test Site. But no outcry and defense there?

  • ehmoran 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    IF you can't see any problem with this and you don't wonder if there's been some misleading of the public by these scientists, then you definitely are not scientists, you're in denial and would buy any bill of goods sold, and you have no moral principles to stand on.

    On 25 November 2009 at 12:15 PM, I attempted to post comments on RealClimate.org concerning this matter. That website obviously refused to post my comments because they know me, which is another attempt to silence objective parties on this subject and since they were the ones that threatened my job.....

    Now, think about this. Al Gore PUBLICLY states that the Earth’s Mantle temperatures are MILLION of DEGREES. The man doesn't even have the morality, decency, and/or courage to publicly admit he was WRONG. WHY SHOULD these scientists admit they screwed the pooch. They can't, because if they do, the gig is up.......

  • Jim 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Please don't let this exposure of fraud die folks, bring the pain!

  • M Btok 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Thank God we have a Prime Minister in Canada that has more sense than President Barack Obama, who is in a hurry to get American citizen's paying Proven Fraudulent Carbon Taxes! Of course Obama's main concern is not the American people but his own butt as he has invested heavily in the Carbon Trading scam as has Al Gore and all the cohorts! They are in the scam for big bucks at our expense of course!
    infowars.com
    Retired climatologist Dr. Tim Ball joins us to discuss the significance of the recently leaked emails and documents from the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University which expose deceit, duplicity and collusion between climate researchers to maintain the fraud of the manmade global warming theory. These emails reveal stunning behind-the-scenes details about how this fraud has been developed and perpetuated, and Dr. Ball shares his insights on what they show. Archived Stories at infowars.com

  • FTM 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    I'm just a mono-brow automotive factory worker but I saw this coming years ago when algore and his ilk were ranting about "settled science" and "we have to dooOOooo something now!!!"

    By the bye, I wanna be just like algore when I grow up. I wanna get paid $100,00.00 for running my mouth for twenty minutes regarding a subject of which I have no practical knowledge. There's some guy saying that liberalism is a mental disorder and whoever the guy is he couldn't be more right.

    Wanna buy a pet rock or a mood ring?

    It's against the law for stupid people to have money and this situation proves the fact.

  • FTM 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Remember...

    Radon Gas? Farce.

    Acid Rain? Farce.

    Ozone Depletion? Farce.

    Don't you remember these "emergencies?" Don't you remember?

    It's not that these people are wrong this time around, it's that they've never been right. It's all about hatred of individual freedom and individual exceptionalism.

  • jallen 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Consider - The emails were not a result of a hacker's activity. They were also not going to be produced under a FOIA request.

    Rather, they are the residual emails comprising those which had already been *sanitized* from the CRU systems to illegally prepare an incomplete reponse for a future (likely successful) FOIA request.

    Note that there is a very small percentage of personal chatter that typically make up close colleague's communication. Therefore, it points to a previous culling.

    Theory: These are deleted emails from a sanitized batch which were foolishly or purposely archived and/or discovered by an insider (perhaps the sanitizer himself). The insider then had pangs of conscience or an axe to grind and released them surreptitiously.

    Also, data fabrication and algorithm manipulation are not at all the important issues here.

    The travesty is that they were peer-reviewing each other's work! They had control of their own process. It was a closed-loop system compris

  • VG 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    I think you need to go to WUWT and CA now there are major findings re the DATA much more damaging to Hadley etc..AGW than the emails

  • Michael Suede 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    The actual hacked climate model source code explained by a software developer:

    youtube: Gp4sMasX-_8

    This is better than the emails, trust me.

  • John 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    examiner.com is un-vetted journalism. Edmund Jenks, thankfully your article won't be read by very many people, no decent news agency would hire you. Bet your one of the ones who drives a 1970, 5 litre gas guzzler. You write articles like this, blissfully unaware that you directly contributed to the flooding of towns and cities across the world. If the world were left in your hands, the majority of life on earth would be wiped out in 50 years.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...