We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 44°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

Same-sex marriage activists doom DOMA repeal

Cong. Nadler abandons Obama's "legally-recognized unions" for only "marriage," dooming DOMA repeal.
Cong. Nadler abandons Obama's "legally-recognized unions" for only "marriage," dooming DOMA repeal.
Credits: 
Official House photo

President Obama came into office supporting repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). DOMA allows states to refuse to recognized same-sex marriages performed in other states or countries. The President proposed granting the federal rights of marriage to all same-sex couples in “legally-recognized unions,” marriages, civil unions, domestic partnerships or any other recognition a state offers. Currently, this would cover 14 states.

However, Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) has pushed aside the President’s proposal and introduced a bill repealing DOMA but only granting federal rights to married same-sex couples. As of January 1, 2010, this would only cover four New England states and Iowa. Congressman Nadler has abandoned his President at the behest of marriage-only activists, groups like Marriage Equality, USA, who believe including anything but marriage would undermine the drive for same-sex marriage.

This has left western LGBT activist upset because Washington, Oregon, California and Nevada have domestic partnerships & Hawaii and Colorado have other forms of recognition. Jeff Sheehy, who worked on San Francisco's 1996 equal benefits ordinance requiring city contractors to extend the equal marital benefits to domestic partnerships, called Nadler’s exclusion of everything but marriage “a mistake.”

Much more significant, however, is the fact that the President's "legally-recognized unions" would have had a better chance of passing Congress. In the public’s mind, legally-recognized unions would appear much more like domestic partnerships which is about fairness, not marriage. This is why domestic partnerships enjoy 55-60% public support. On the other hand, the Nadler Bill has zero chance of passing Congress because it is all about the "M" word and will not get the support it needs to pass because only about 35-40% of American voters support same-sex marriage. Even openly gay Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank, no one’s shrinking violet, has refused to co-sponsor Nadler’s bill because it is dead-on-arrival. Members of Congress are aware that same-sex marriage has never won an election while the voters in Washington State passed domestic partnerships by a respectable margin.

Unless Congressman Nadler does some quick back tracking, DOMA repeal is a non-starter in the current Congress despite the President’s support. Of course, introducing a bill with a chance of passage means that the one introducing the bill has to work like hell to get it though Congress. Sponsoring a bill which pleases your donor base but has no chance is much easier because no one really expects results. From Congressman Nadler’s point of view this bill is a win-win situation. He takes the credit, and the contributions, but does not have to do much work for it. (A fact his staff and his supporter will, no doubt, be quick to deny.)

Since 1942 the sitting president's party has lost an average 28 House seats and four senators in midterm elections. In all probability there will be fewer Democrats in the House and Senate in the next Congress sinking DOMA repeal for the foreseeable future, maybe a generation. The LGBT community has Marriage Equality, USA and their allies to thank for this. A sad victory of ideological purity over the mundane efforts to win much needed marital rights because those rights may not be labeled “marriage.”

Update:  December 10, 2009 DC Agenda reported "Rep. Jerrold Nadler said the Respect for Marriage Act, which would overturn the Defense of Marriage Act, won’t pass next year."

Advertisement

By

SF Civil Rights Examiner

Leland Traiman, RN & nurse practitioner, helped write the first domestic partner law in 1984. He coordinated the Berkeley Gay Men's Health...

Comments

  • David M 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Quote: "President Obama came into office supporting repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)."

    Obama's Justice Department is DEFENDING DOMA. Obama isn't REQUIRED to do it. OBAMA is defending DOMA because HE WANTS TO DEFEND DOMA. Obama is worried about losing his Black and Hispanic constituency -- two mostly anti-gay groups -- by looking like he is catering to the gay community. I had an acquaintance once, who would speak kindly to me only when others of his peer group weren't around to hear him. At other times, it was "get out of my way non-person." So, this Obama "high school" treatment will not deter gays by any means; gays become immune to this type of rejection over time. I say, if you are gay, please run for public office, and fund your OWN candidates instead of DemiPublicans. Demipublicans only want gay votes and gay money. After that, gays are to disappear for 4 years until it is time for them to be spitefully used again by the fully-enfranchised elite. Say no to that.

  • Joe Mustich, JP 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Interesting article...but the civil rights struggle takes courage and leadership, which is sorely lacking in DC.

    So can I vote on your marriage? Of course not...
    So folks shouldn't be voting on it to begin with.

    And lets not forget that marriage is firstly a civil matter in America, as marriage licenses are issued by and recorded in town halls not church halls or mosques or temples.

    Onward to equality,
    Joe Mustich, Justice of the Peace,
    Washington, Connecticut, USA.

    So come to CT to wed where we just celebrated the one year anniversary of our marriage equality law.

  • JD in San Diego 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    This article is upsetting. First to say that "...domestic partnerships is about fairness, not marriage" like the "M" word is a bad thing, and "domestic partnerships" should be "good enough". "Good enough" is not equal, and equality should be our only goal. Barney Frank is 100% out of touch with any and all progressive movement; just because he's gay doesn't mean that his (dis)approval is some sort of "litmus test" for lgbt rights in America.

    Marriage is not just a label, it is a fully recognized right. If it was "good enough" and "just a label" then everyone would be "domestically partnered", and everyone would be pushing to go in that direction, and every heterosexual would be ok with it, not 10%. But given the choice, 90% of heterosexuals would prefer to get married. That 40% of Americans that favors equal rights, is far more than the 10% that favored rights for bi-racial couples in the 60's.

  • The Voice of Reason 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    The bill makes sense. If a law is on the books that says that those western states have laws that are 'good enough' for the gays, then that will cripple their chances at marriage equality, because opponents will say that their second class citizen status already gives them all the rights on the federal level. They would be banned from marriage 'forever'.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...