.jpg)
Mike Fox- Hawaii Reporter.com
Dr. Michael Fox has a new report on the fraud that is rampant inside the "Global Climate Change" cabal. Once again he takes apart the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth.
With the Copenhagen "Climate Change" meeting coming up in mere weeks, it is important that people realize now, the entire industry is set about taking your hard earned dollars and putting it into their own pockets, and redistributing it to their friends. It is time to wake up and recognize this global fraud for what it is, and stop it in its tracks.
Here is Dr. Fox's report:
-D. Cotter 10-28-2009
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The global warming lobby keeps shooting itself in the foot. (http://tinyurl.com/yzsnhna). This is not limited to the scientific frauds of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), but extends into other significant agencies. One of the major areas of climate misrepresentation is that involving global sea levels.
Sea levels were portrayed in Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” as rising twenty feet in the coming years. Meredith Viera of NBC, not to be outdone, threw out the estimated future sea level rise at 200 feet. Global warming’s unscientific fiction writers must always embellish their stories with rich imaginations.
Dr. Vincent Gray is a climate expert living in New Zealand and one of the most prolific reviewers of all of the significant documents produced by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). From his intimate knowledge he has found that both the IPCC and its documents are hopelessly flawed scientifically, including the chapters devoted to sea level rises. He recently reported this about the sea level situation in the South Pacific:
“As I keep pointing out Flinders University in Adelaide had the task in 1991 of settling it once and for all by installing state-of-the-art tide-gauge equipment on 12 Pacific islands. The results have been a disaster for the global warmers” (shown in table below)... There was no overall change in sea levels at any of the islands after the sixteen years. The reaction was what might be expected. They have been studiously ignored. The results have never been published in a "peer reviewed" journal. They are only available on the Australian Bureau of Meteorology website in a series of Monthly Reports that are "Untitled".
See the latest report at http://www.bom.gov.au/ntc/IDO60101/IDO60101.200809.pdf
The 16 years of sea level data in the South Sea Islands are shown in the chart below. Please notice that the South Pacific sea levels have changed little since the monitoring stations were installed.
More recently, on October 17, 2009 ClimateDepot.com http://www.climatedepot.com/ reported that Mohammed Nasheed, president of the Maldives Islands of the coast of India in the Pacific Ocean had staged an underwater meeting of his cabinet (http://tinyurl.com/ykb3ctc).
President Nasheed’s frightening message was dutifully carried by the media to the four corners of the world. The message was that rising sea levels are a direct threat to his nation and are being caused by rising global temperatures causing icecaps to melt which in turn causes the sea levels to rise.
There are a number of flaws in the president’s argument, but apparently they haven’t reached his desk. He also should read the table below and the referenced sea level report above.
As has happened so often in the past, this alarming message from the President of the Maldives does not provide a shred of underlying evidence to support his dire situation. This message was intended to portray to the world the Maldives Islands are threatened by rising sea levels. For example, the good Maldives president does not mention the findings a dozen new sea level monitoring stations which have recorded seal levels in the south Pacific for more than 10 years. See (http://tinyurl.com/yff8aof) and chart below.
In addition to the recent excellent data from new sea level monitoring stations in the South Pacific, there is significantly more pertinent sea level data. President Nasheed, of all people, should know about sea level research of that part of the planet, performed by a number of people including one of the foremost sea level experts in the world. He is the Swedish scientist Nils-Axel Morner.
In an October 20th letter to President Nasheed, Morner wrote, (http://tinyurl.com/ykb3ctc):
“When I was president for an international commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution, we spent much effort on the question of present-to-future sea level changes. After intensive field studies, deliberation within the commission and discussions at five international meetings, we agreed on a “best estimate” for possible sea level changes by the year 2100. Our figure was +10 cm ±10 cm. This figure was later revised at +5 cm ±15cm. Such changes would imply small to negligible effects.
Such a small rise would pose no threat for the Maldives. Rather, it would be a natural return to the conditions existing from 1790 to 1970; i.e. to the position before the sea level fall in the 1970s.
So, Mr. President, when you ignore available observational facts, refuse a normal democratic dialogue, and continue to menace your people with the imaginary threat of a disastrous flooding already in progress, I think you are doing a serious mistake.
Let us, for Heaven’s sake, lift the terrible psychological burden that you and your predecessor have placed upon the shoulders of all people in the Maldives, who are now living with the imagined threat that flooding will soon drive them from their homes, a wholly false notion that is nothing but an armchair fiction artificially constructed by mere computer modeling constantly proven wrong by meticulous real-world observations.
Sea Level Graph
Your cabinet meeting under the water is nothing but a misdirected gimmick or PR stunt. Al Gore is a master in such cheap techniques. But such misconduct is dishonest, unproductive and certainly most un-scientific.”
Instead of discredited documentaries, journalistic fictions, and underwater PR stunts driving these global warming debates, let’s not forget to ask for the actual climate evidence (which has been cooling now for several years).
Michael R. Fox, Ph.D., is a nuclear scientist and a science and energy resource for Hawaii Reporter and a science analyst for the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, is retired and now lives in Eastern Washington. He has nearly 40 years experience in the energy field. He has also taught chemistry and energy at the University level. His interest in the communications of science has led to several communications awards, hundreds of speeches, and many appearances on television and talk shows. He can be reached via email at mailto:mike@foxreport.org
Fox Energy & Environment Reports...
Comments
First it was "Usurper"; now it is "cabal".
Di, I love your expanded vocabulary, but you are nuttier than a fruitcake.
The only fraud is big business trying to distort the truth and gullible wing nuts like you who take the bait - hook, line and sinker!
Olivia, - Look up and practice "Critical Reading skills". It is the first step to making intelligent comments on serious matters such as science and law.
Cheers!
Nice work, Dianna.
Just wondering if Olivia - and those who share her rather obvious political inclinations - has anything to offer in the way of rebuttal beyond name-calling and delusions of a coordinated effort by the ever-popular 'big business' bogeymen to lull the world into a false sense of security?
Because, as we all know, the real goal of those of us who refuse to go along with and/or perpetuate the global warming hoax is, of course, to see every land mass on earth buried under two hundred feet of water before the whole shooting match goes up in a giant ball of flame. It's not like we live here too or anything...
So, Olivia, a few questions to get the ball rolling:
Who, specifically, is 'big business'?
What 'truth' - again, be specific - is it that they are distorting, and in what ways are they distorting it?
What <em>factual</em> evidence, scientific or otherwise, can you produce to support your position?
-Cnation
just curious...has anyone ever seen ice melt in a cup?
if you're worried about me distorting facts, don't worry, you can do this one on your own.
measure how much water is in the cup before and after the ice melts. please report back your findings here.
now, let's play devil's advocate and assume the anthropogenic global warming as a given (and not the doctored hoax designed to make people like Al Gore rich that it truly is). imagine that cup is now the earth, and the two large ice cubes at either end melt. spread over all that distance, there will be a negligible impact. now granted, if in fact the ice caps melt it would cause billions of [penguin] deaths, but that's a perfectly plausible reason to cripple our own industry while the biggest "polluter" nations (china, india, etc.) continue their ways uninhibited. let's punish the middle and working classes of our nation to pursue some ideological movement based on flimsy science!
Hey Jason - what happens next, when I take a 10 pound block of ice and drop it in your cup?
See, the ice in the Arctic is floating - BUT THE ICE IN ANTARCTICA IS MILES THICK ON TO OF LAND - AND APPEARS TO BE SLIDING INTO THE OCEAN!!!
Whatcha think THAT will do to your li'l cup of water?
Please join us on internet radio in about 90 minutes. We'll talk things over and perhaps help with the general increase in awareness.
Call-in Number: (646) 727-2652
Sentinel_Radio
blogtalk radio Arlen & Hanen
I agree with Olivia.
Water forms hydrogen bonds that are dynamic (always changing). The density of water increases as the temperature decreases. However, when water freezes it becomes less dense than water. That is because it forms static hydrogen bonds between molecules causing the molecules to be farther apart in the solid state. That is why ice floats on water.
Glaciers are dynamic, too. They are rivers of ice constantly flowing in slow motion to the sea. This is an indisputable fact proven by global positioning research. At the ocean the glaciers break off into icebergs in a process called calving. THis is a NORMAL process. When you see the pictures of calving in Al Gores movie ...remember that you are witnessing a normal process. You are being manipulated by Gore and others.
It is clear from reading many of the comments regarding scientific issues in the public domain that despite our country's generous expenditure on education, few are scientifically literate. Thank goodness for those who are.
But, li'l alchemist, you ignore the fact the Greenland and Antarctic glaciers are falling into the sea AT AN INCREASING RATE - as well as ignore the fact that they constitute a net increase in total water volume in the sea when they melt.
How's that lead into gold thing working for you, BTW?
Acerbic...I told you I would no long discuss such things with you.
1) Despite your delusions, I am NOT acerbic - I'm less bitter and much more nasty. (Heck, I had to poke around to find out who acerbis was!)
2) I do not 'debate' - I simply point out stupidity.
Speaking of which, you evaded the question of increased glacier melt and it's effect on total sea water volume.
We won't even get into that nasty new study indicating how rapidly the Atlantic Conveyor might be turned off.
Dano,
I went to your journals and found that 2 were legitimate refereed journal but that they require subscriptions to access the text so one can only read the abstract The abstract is not sufficient to judge the quality. The third, the first item on your list, is a sciences news online magazine analogous to Slate, the Huffington Post or Newsweek, ie it is not a "journal article". Further, the other articles are research articles about computer modeling results. Computer models are just that...simulations. The results from these experiments do not stand alone as proof. They must be validated with actual experiments. Finally, one of the authors on the article is Isaac Held, from NOAA. Until, Climategate is thoroughly investigated and all the data on which the "hockey stick" climate warming concept is based is re-examined by the scientific community without interference from politics, all conclusions from NOAA and others involved in the alleged conspiricy should be held in abeyance.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!