Images as seen on a millimeter-wave scanner
Source: TSA
I've written before about the whole-body imaging scanners finding their way into the nation's airports. A relatively new innovation, they're theoretically being implemented in a way that give airline passengers a choice between ... well ... Honestly, a choice between offering TSA agents a peep show or a grope session at airport security checkpoints.
Hey, everybody wins -- as long as you're in uniform.
But even that unpleasant dilemma may be overstating the options available to travelers. Robyn Blumner, a columnist for the St. Petersburg Times, describes her experience returning to the U.S. from Europe through the Dallas-Fort Worth Airport:
The TSA agent hadn't bothered to explain that I had the right to decline and submit to a pat-down by a female agent instead — a choice I would have taken.
Yet [Sari Koshetz, a spokeswoman for the TSA] insists that being given that choice verbally is protocol.
When I objected to having had a photo taken under my clothes, the agent snapped "it's not a nude picture" but then couldn't explain what it is.
Koshetz claims that all security officers "understand" the technology and are "able to explain it."
Either I got the most incompetent TSA agent of the bunch, or there's a gaping chasm between official claims and reality.
The image taken by the millimeter wave scanners and revealed to TSA agents (you can see an example above) isn't exactly the stuff that porn is made of. Well, it's actually not all that different from 19th-century naughty photographs, but it's not the stuff that modern porn is made of. But the images leave nothing to the imagination. If you cling to any vestigial thoughts of privacy and dignity as you enter a U.S. airport these days, whole-body scanners are certain to strip them from you -- along with your clothes.
Concerns about being bared to the skin are only exacerbated, Blumner points out, by revelations that NSA technicians -- a more elite group than the TSA personnel drowsing their way through each workday at the airport -- entertained themselves by listening in on phone sex and romantic calls between overseas military personnel, journalists and aid workers and their loved ones at home. As one NSA whistleblower told ABC News:
"Hey, check this out," Faulk says he would be told, "there's good phone sex or there's some pillow talk, pull up this call, it's really funny, go check it out. It would be some colonel making pillow talk and we would say, 'Wow, this was crazy'," Faulk told ABC News.
And in Britain, that much-surveilled country, government workers and police have repeatedly been caught using that nation's extensive network of security cameras for entertainment purposes. In one incident in Merseyside, technicians directed a camera intended to monitor streets to peer through the windows of a woman's apartment. Camera personnel in Tyneside were caught trading nude images they'd captured in local pubs.
If NSA techs can get off on pillow talk, and British cops on candid shower shots, the idea that TSA agents aren't going to have a little fun with the naked images of passengers streaming before them is preposterous.
Look, all powers are abused. All of them. The only way to approach any expansion of state authority and additions to its armory of tools and toys is to assume that they'll all be misused in the most foolish, most egregious way conceivable.
And even then, some enterprising flunkies will develop even more damaging applications than you could ever imagine.
"You can trust us, we're professionals," should be greeted with a restrained giggle and an expectation of trouble to come.
Along those lines, expect Robyn Blumner's ordeal to be a glimpse of the future.
You can discuss hot topics with other readers, click through a regular feed of Civil Liberties Examiner headlines, and check out categorized compilations of stories. Join now!
Contact J.D.: civilliberties (at) tuccille.com
Comments
Is anyone troubled by the fact that soon the TSA will have the largest collection of child porn in the world?
I'm troubled by the existence of TSA.
When do we get our freedoms back?
Hilarious that so many people have a problem with this, and go out've their way to demonize security personell. I have no problem with a system which makes it plainly obvious that those who have nothing to hide have nothing to complain about. If you're afraid of what they'll see, then sure, you have a problem with it. This isn't a freedom thing, because once you step out've your house you have no 'privacy'.
I went to school with the girl on the right! Honestly, you could identify someone easier on television with their face blurred out than any of these x-ray looking pictures. I dont believe these can be classed as 'nude', grow up and stop complaining about everything just because you have nothing better to do. I would feel safer flying once these get operational aslong as they dont have any negative affects.
To counter the perpetually scared who say they feel safer flying knowing this technology is in use, I say let's bring back knives and liquids and unchecked shoes on flights. Having just taken two flights yesterday, I am reminded of why even the director of the TSA calls it "security theater". Aviation experts and pilots alike will tell you if someone wants to blow up a plane it's a lot easier to do it without going through the hassle of actually putting a hijacker on a plane. If you think passengers would allow a hijacker to gain control of an aircraft post-9/11 you are naive and wrong (as proven a few weeks ago in Turkey). TSA, take your lewd body scans and die in a fire.
Does anybody else find it funny that they claim these pictures can't be downloaded, yet there is a picture with this article? No? Alrighty.
If they scan a child, aren't they creating child pornography?
Others have been convicted of less
I'd like a printout of my photo as a souvenir. What says "America" more to a traveller than a full body scan?
If this will get me through security faster....scan away. If not...kiss off.
Terrorists have already succeeded. It's all about fear. They don't need to blow up any more planes. Their goal is to make us afraid and take away our freedoms and they have. Thanks anyway US gov't and TSA but I'll pass.
People concerned about these b&w lo-quality images of themselves "naked" are over sensitive. With all the porn available free online, with good quality images, why do you think someone is interested in this somewhat skeletal x-ray looking picture of you? And what's even more perplexing to me is the women that are upset over this new technology. I mean, c'mon, it shows way more detail of a naked male. You women show more at the beach.
So grow up, so I don't have to blow up!
So what if a stranger in TSA sees the outline of your vulva or breast - he/she doesn't know who you are, where you live, and within seconds, he/she will have moved onto the next image. You are being ridiculous!
Honestly, I'm going to intentionally get a boner before walking through, because I want to look my best!
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!