(3).jpg)
Insert photo caption or credit here
Jerry Bergman, PhD is a young earth creation (YEC) scientist. He holds two PhDs, one in sociology from Bowling Green State and one in human biology from Columbia Pacific University. He has been a consultant for more than 20 years on science text books.
"One of the most compelling evidences in support of the instantaneous creation world view is the daily observation that information does not come about by chance and if left to itself, disorder usually soon results."
"Complexity and information are compelling evidence that some outside intelligence (which in the case of archeologist's findings was another human) has applied design skills."
"Products produced by the nonliving world (such as smooth stones polished by moving water) could never produce either plant or animal life because all life is based on information, and the parts produced by that information must be assembled according to a designed plan."
"Time, the chief escape that naturalism must rely on to support its theory, is thus a false god. Complex ordered structures of any kind (of which billions must exist in the body for it to work) cannot happen except by design and intelligence, and they must have occurred simultaneously for the unit to function. Scientists recognize this problem."
"Evolutionists have not even been able to posit a mechanistic “first” coincidence, only the assumption that each step must have had a survival advantage and only by this means could evolution from simple to complex have occurred."
"The probability of naturalistic evolution is essentially zero."Examiner.com Examiner Publishing Tool
"Researchers do not yet know all of the factors necessary for life 'to live.'”
"The concept that life could produce itself if the proper circumstances existed is no longer accepted as possible by secular scientists."
"This principle of science that life only comes from life is called the “law of biogenesis.”
"Scientists have demonstrated that the belief that “life” could come from “nonlife,” even if millions of years were available, is untenable."
"There is not a shred of objective evidence to support the hypothesis that life began in an organic soup here on the earth."
"All of the extant evidence reveals that there is nothing living on earth, either animal or plant, that did not receive its life from previous life, its sexual or asexual parent."
Psalm 36:9 applies - "For with you is the fountain of life."
Ask your gut, which makes more sense. Something from nothing or something from something. That's the answer.
See also:
12 more insights of young earth creation (YEC) scientist - Jeremy Walter, PhD, 2 of 2
and
12 insights of young earth creation (YEC) scientist - Jeremy Walter, PhD, (1 of 2)
and
12 insights of young earth creation (YEC) scientist - Jerry Bergman, PhD, part 1 of 2
The entire essay can be found here.
Comments
"One of the most compelling evidences in support of the instantaneous creation world view is the daily observation that information does not come about by chance..."
Perhaps you could offer us the definition of "information" which Bergman uses.
"Ask your gut, which makes more sense. Something from nothing or something from something. That's the answer."
Ask your brain: which is claiming something from nothing, evolution or Creationism?
And this guy and nine degrees, one a PhD in human biology? All of his points have been soundly refuted. Does he live in a bubble?
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!