Robert Pattinson confirms 'Breaking Dawn'
'Breaking Dawn' confirmed?
Now that 'New Moon' is right around the corner and 'Eclipse' is wrapped 'Twilight' fans are beginning to wonder about the fourth installment of the 'Twilight Saga, Breaking Dawn.'
Will there be a 'Breaking Dawn' movie? If so, will producers break it up in to more than one film? As of last week fans weren't even sure if there would be a 'Breaking Dawn' movie.
But Robert Pattinson spilled some details at a 'New Moon' press conference yesterday in Beverly Hills.
Pattinson was ask about his filming schedule for the next year and answered by saying he'll be filming 'Bel Ami' where he'll play a womanizer, along with western 'Unbound Captives' and ending with 'Breaking Dawn.' Saying; "I think the tentative time for Breaking Dawn is fall of next year," Pattinson said. He did add that Summit "may well change that."
Do you want to see 'Breaking Dawn' split into more than one movie? Comment below. (profane or disrespectful comments will be removed.)
Enjoy this article? You can receive email alerts when a new article is posted. Just click the "subscribe" button at the top of that page.
Comments
At least 2 movies should be made! Otherwise the whole movie will be ruined by trying to stuff too much info into a short period or it will be ruined by cutting too much out!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Definitely 2 or more movies. You cant fit the whole book into one movie without it being rushed. BD is my favorite book and i dont want to see it ruined.
Definitely 2 movies....a lot happens in that book and I would hate to have it be a let down by trying to cram all of it into one movie.
its a tuff call... i mean where would they end the first movie there really isnt a break in the book to end with one and start another...
2 movies for sure. it would be horrible to rush it into just one movie. but, it would be nice for the movies to be out in the same year, one in the summer and one around the holidays.
It has to be two movies and they should end the first with Bella spilling the cup of blood and then start the second with the birth!
I would hate to wait for yet another movie, but in all honesty, they almost HAVE to do two movies for everything that happens in that book. Truth be told, I'm looking forward to seeing their honeymoon, of course and Bella's experience as a newborn vampire. I could probably do without the lengthy details of her pregnancy. Yes, there are some important scenes in there, but even when I was reading the book, I thought to myself, "Geez...how long is Stephanie going to drag out this pregnancy?" Just my opinion :)
I would not like to wait , but if it means where the movie will live to the books expection so be it. but may they not make it that long for us to see it, please.....
The film Breaking Dawn should be made into 2 movies, it just makes perfect sense for there to be part 1 and part 2. Theres no need for a part 3, so Breaking Dawn should be made into 2 films not 1 or 3.
I hate waiting for sequels. I think two movies would be appropriate, but I want to see everything now! Gandhi was three hours long, Australia was a little over three; I think BD could be made to satisfaction in about three hours. I f they cut out all the boring pregnancy dialogue, it would work.
Breaking Dawn shoild be 2 or 3 movies at least 2!!!!!!!!!!
WE SO THINK THAT IT SHOULD BE DRAGGED OUT. SO YES TO MORE THEN ONE MOVIE :D
IMO it should be made in 1 but longer 135 minutes.
I think they should have more than one movie because if they only had one, a lot of details would be missing and 2 hours is just to short for this one. This movie has 2 different things going and one movie isn't going to cut it.
NO!!!! 1 MOVIE IS MORE THEN ENOUGH. IT WOULD NEED TO PROBABLY BE 1 LONG MOVIE BUT THERE REALLY ISN'T ENOUGH DETAIL FOR 2 MOVIES.
I think they want to get Quentin Tarantino to direct that birth scene!! There was too much dialogue in breaking dawn. Like the bit when all the vamps were coming to help. I just hope they pitch the age a bit higher so we get it a bit more realistic. Yes I would like 2 movies or one big finale!
1 movie...breaking dawn just about broke me reading all the blah blah blah in it. I loved the other twibooks but that one really wore me out but that being said I would still go see the movie :-)
Definitely 2 movies! I think they should end the first movie at the end of Jacobs book from Breaking Dawn. Then start the 2nd movie starting with Bella book 2. I think that would be a perfect break between the movies and leave everyone hanging on for more!
I think #2 movies. the movie is mutch to long to fit into one movie. in addition the ators will be able to breath for a couples monthes and director can figure out the casting for Renesmee. Pretty much time to breath and figure things out. The movie will benifttied alot if two movies are broken up. theyll be able to make it better and talk to staphinie abit more. i think they should make a saga to breaking dawn. to get a feel of jacob and renesmee. the opinouns iwll be settteled more and stephinie will be able to esprees it. how she reacts to jacobs impring, the paxst of jacob her mother and father, prety much from Renesmee point of veiw and not to leave her out. to get to know her but while infusing jacobs confusen of how to tell her. the influence of both of theses two that might end up or not together. other characters could be added to. just sidelines.
NO! even if millions love the story and the caracters, who will want to watch more than an hour of wedding and honeymoon ?????? please! I would do the wedding and the honeymoon in a music clip way- 5 to 10 minutes for both is MORE THAN ENOUGH!
ONE MOVIE
Yes, if you have more movies you have more stuff in the movie that otherwise would be ruine by cutting it out.
I think it should def be atleast two. Just think about how much more money summit will make with 2 movies. (In my town new moon has sold out for the first week at the movies) And i live in a small town. They would be stupid not to make atleast 2.
Defiantly two parts. I disagree with Liz, the birth scene is one of the biggest. And I agree with M. One in the summer, one in the winter. It'd totally work. If Titanic was long, Breaking Dawn can be long. Both great. :D One movie, would just not be able to get all the important details from the movie. Its impossible. I was just wondering maybe like, part one Bella's story. And part two Jacob's story, but that would probably be confusing. Hmm. Yes, very confusing.
[Cont] Do two movies. It'll be nice. And alot of fans will be happy. Just don't release part one in 2011. Then, part two in 2012. I'll be sad and want to kick a stuffed animal. :D
2 movies...will be best, I loved all the books. It would be a big disapointment if they do not capture the story lines.
i think it shld b 1 long film cuz otherwise the 1st will be all the wedding and honeymoon and pregnancy and that wld b really boring.... it shld b longer than normal tho... =/
i think they should do like they did in titanic
2 movies, of course, I think that if it's just one movie, even a verly long one, they wouldn't put all the important details and I think it won't work out. Besides, is a really good book, I wouldn't like to be dissapointed by the movie.
I think that two movies would be the best way to do things. Probably end after Jacob imprints then the rest of it.
I would say one movie. Only because the pregnancy/birth scene was SO long and took up a third of the book. I think that part will definitely be shorter, we do not need to see hours of pregnancy. I agree that there is SO much in the book that needs to be added to the movie but if the pregnancy scene was shortened, which it has to be, then I think they can fit it all in a three hour movie. And then no waiting!!!
GO BREAKING DAWNNNNN!!! I think that the movie should be one looonnnngggg movie instead of 2 movies. Then there would be less time to wait.:)
Breaking Dawn she be made into one long movie it would be better that way so we dnt have to wait to see the second part of it :)
I say TWO movies!!! There's just so much that they would cut out of the book to make it fit into one movie. Also, it makes more sense financially and creatively for Summit to make Breaking Dawn into two movies, like Harry Potter.
I think 3 movies... wedding, honeymoon and pregnancy 1st movie. 2nd movie could be vamps all coming together to protect Renesmee and Jacobs imprinting with her and all that drama...then if Miss Stephanie would get ultra ambitious she could go to the next chapter and do a book on Jacob and Renesmee(if I remember correctly she's full grown in just a few years right? Taylor would have just aged enough for his role...Charlie(Billy) can just age a little and there's enough Botox in Hollywood for the rest of them. I'm not too worried about the time between movies because I think most of us are really enjoying the anticipation in between movies and I think most of you will really come down hard when the saga is over...can anyone say "Vampolves"?
i would like to see one movie but i know they will not have all the details, so ima say two movies.. first movie should end up at jacob book, second movie should start when bella is transforming....
Definately one big movie, i couldnt deal with the suspense between the two films!!
if its going to be 2 movies i hope theres not a five or six month gap between their realeases maybe like a week but no longerr
The book is too large to put the story in one movie.
2 or 3 movies were fantastic.
i think it should be 2 movies but it wud be weird cuz how do they end the first movie? and if it is 2 movies then they should come out one week apart =)
Man, there are so many fans the producers don;t have to worry. This back and forth between 2 parts and 1 is not helping them. I would say details. The details in breaking dawn should not be cheapened or shortened. There are many people who will sit through a movie that is 3-4 hrs long. Just look at the people who saw lord of the rings and every movie Kevin Costner is in.
sorry forgot to mention that it still has to flow. I mean, if you cut the movie in half make sure the dates of release are relatively close or back to back so it flows better.
i think they should do 2 movies coz i want all the details but they must make them in the same time and they should come out at the same time i even think 3 could be good but in all the cases i want all the details from the book.VAMPIRE ATTITUDE WOHOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NO WAY . because we would have to wait for the second part and thats long man.
they should make a verrrryyyy long movie like 3h30 or more to be sure ther is ALLLLL the details on it!!!!!!!!!!!!team vampire !!!!!!!!!!!!
shush person below me
shushhh!!!!!!! cheese dont u agree with me?????
no i dont . coz if they add all the details in , it could be a bit boring , but they can put most things in , but not every single word . hahahahhaa , u shush !
cheese: i didn't mean each word!!!!! i just wanted to say like u! most of it!! ok? we agree 2gether now???
yes yes yes .
cool!!! vampire fan wohooooooo!!!!!!!!!!
(volturis r sick btw)
Pages
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!