The economic turmoil in the country -and not tougher border enforcement as it had been assumed, is the real cause of the recently noticeable decrease on illegal immigration and on the number of apprehensions in the U.S.-Mexico border. These are the findings of a recent investigative project developed by the Center for Comparative Immigration Studies at the University of California, San Diego.
The study was released to the public by the Immigration Policy Center, based in Washington D.C., today. Please see below the introduction by the IPC and the corresponding links to the study and other support data.
---------------
Keeping Migrants Here:
Recent Research Shows Unintended Consequences of U.S. Border Enforcement
June 17, 2009
Washington D.C. - The Department of Homeland Security released a report this week showing that apprehensions of undocumented immigrants at the U.S.-Mexico border are at their lowest level since 1973, leaving many observers contemplating the factors responsible for this decline. Is it the recession-plagued U.S. economy or beefed-up enforcement efforts? New data from a research team led by Wayne Cornelius, Director of the Center for Comparative Immigration Studies at the University of California, San Diego, sheds light on the decline in apprehensions and reveals the surprising, unintended consequences of border enforcement.
According to 4,012 interviews conducted with migrants and prospective migrants in Mexico, California, and Oklahoma between 2005 and 2009, the drying up of the U.S. job market, coupled with the high personal and financial costs of migration, are slowing the pace of undocumented migration from Mexico. At the same time, undocumented immigrants already here are staying put due to the high costs and physical risks of being smuggled back into the United States, fear of losing their U.S. jobs, and lack of economic opportunities in Mexico. The data reveals that, ironically, enhanced border security has created "reduced circularity in migration"- essentially locking migrants in the United States as the prospect of going home and returning later has become increasingly expensive and dangerous.
The new research conducted by Cornelius' team indicates that the condition of the U.S. economy is far more significant in explaining the recent decline in border apprehensions than any of the enforcement-only measures that have been implemented to date. Border-enforcement efforts will continue to be largely ineffectual until the U.S. immigration system is brought into line with the ups and downs of U.S. labor demand, which drives so much of undocumented immigration in the first place. Enforcement is not a substitute for reform.
For more info: The complete findings of the Cornelius team's research can be found in this IPC Fact Check:
• Keeping Migrants Here: Recent Research Shows Unintended Consequences of U.S. Border Enforcement
Comments
Yeah, Doubling the number of border parol agents and customs officers has nothing to do with it. That survey is part fantasy and part BS; it seems likely that the authors of the survey are pro illeagal immigration, and anti border protection
What nonsense. Where a proper fence has been installed, apprehensions of illegal aliens dropped significantly. Just as drug smugglers are having a tough time getting their poisons into the U.S., illegal aliens are facing greater obstacles caused by new fencing.
In San Diego the double-layered fence reduced apprehensions by more than 95%.. But ten miles east at Tecate, DHS left in place old 10-foot fencing and much of what DHS calls fencing isn't fencing at all. h
"Open borders advocates hate the fence because they know that, when properly installed, it works," said Glenn Spencer of the American Border Patrol. Spencer said ABP would be filing an updated report on the border fence on June 27th.
Double-layered fencing, E-Verify, enforcement of exisitng immigration laws works (and would work even in a good economy), and the open-border advocates know this -- this is why they fight these common sense measures tooth and nail.
Typical open borders university blather. Does anyone believe if the fence in San Diego was torn down no one would then try and cross? That fence went up well before the economic collapse the UCSD claims has stopped illegal entry. Can they explain why it worked then when the economy was booming? No, they can't. It doesn't fit into their open borders agenda.
PARASITES GO BACK TO MAHECO
This decrease supports the benefits that can be achieved with E-verify. If the job-magnet is shut off, illegal immigration declines. It's unfortunate that our economy had to crash to prove the "job-magnet" concept, but at least now it's clear that if illegal immigrants cannot find work in the US, illegal immigration WILL decline. Those claiming that work site enforcement doesn't work have been proven wrong.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!