So what if it imposes the largest single tax increase in American history without ever calling it a tax? So what if it creates the biggest expansion of the federal bureaucracy since FDR was New Dealing in the White House? So what if it will millions of Americans their jobs and set America's economy back decades?
Why should the Senate have to actually hear what's in the Lieberman-Warner bill?
That's the cry of the left as Senate GOPers today refused to allow the Senate to proceed with consideration of Lieberman-Warner without the full text of the bill being read aloud. Here's how the National Wildlife Federation's Jeremy Symons puts it:
"Senate Republicans are literally throwing the book at this bill to help oil companies block any action on global warming and a clean energy future. By stalling this bill, Senate Republicans can only stall America's economy. We need to jumpstart our economy with action now to invest in new technology and create clean energy jobs.
"The choice is clear - recharge the economy or let it sit in neutral. Move forward with legislation that addresses an enormous problem while transforming our energy future or stick your head in the sand and hide behind Big Oil propaganda.
"America is ready for a new energy future. If opponents succeed in blocking action on climate change, they will block America's path to a new and stronger economy. The Climate Security Act deserves real debate, not Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's procedural trickery and delay tactics."
Ah, so that's it - it's Big Oil demanding that senators actually read the bill before they vote on it. It's only "real debate" if everybody just ignores what the bill says and goes ahead and trusts the National Wildlife Federation and the rest of the environmental community that it will all be ok.
I say every senator and representative should be required to read every bill they are asked to vote on and to sign a statement attesting to the fact they have done so. And the bill text should be read on the floor in public in its entirety and posted on the Internet for at least 72 hours prior to final voting.
Examiner Editorial:That botched SWAT team raid of a local mayor's home by the Prince George's County Sheriff generated national coverage in part because the only casualties were two black Labrador Retrievers. The lesson here ought to be, according to... Read More
A special report was carried in the Sunday edition of The Examiner that focused on how a coalition of wealty liberal donors and activists with union poitical operatives and trial lawyers is making major progress toward converting Colorado to a... Read More
This is courtesy of the Independent Petroleum Association of America: FACT CHECK: “BIG OIL” Not Using 68 Million Acres of Oil and Gas Leases? Some Politicians Are Obviously Confused About Securing American Energy. ... Read More
A new Rasmussen survey offers this unexpected insight into what voters are thinking as the 2008 campaign heads to the convention phase in late August and early September. Here's how Rasmussen puts it:"Voters overwhelmingly believe that politicians... Read More
Examiner Editorial:Scratching the itch of the totalitarian temptation seems to be a growing urge among liberal politicos and today's Examiner editorial looks at three manifestations of it, concluding that those who care about constitutional liberty need... Read More
Only once in American history did losing a political debate in Congress lead to the deaths and imprisonment of hundreds of thousands of those on the losing side. We came close in the immediate aftermath of the Civil War and during Reconstruction but... Read More
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi isn't having much success with her just-released book; despite her justly laudable status as America's first-ever top leader in the lower chamber of Congress. Thus far and despit extensive favorable publicity from the mainstream... Read More
My former colleagues at The Heritage Foundation took a few minutes to respond to each of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's "Top 10 Questions for House Republicans on Energy." I strongly recommend close reading of both documents and their supporting... Read More
Rep. Roy Blunt (R-MO) Rep. Adam Putnam (R-FL) Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ) Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-NC) Rep. David Davis (R-TN) Rep. Christopher Shays (R-CT) Rep. John Doolittle (R-CA) Rep.... Read More