We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 54°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

Review: 2011 Ford Fiesta SES hatchback


The 2011 Ford Fiesta hatchback drives well for what it is and feels high-quality for what it is, but in the subcompact class, that's not quite as huge of an achievement as some might suggest. See more photos of the Fiesta hatchback in today's slideshow. (photos by Brady Holt)

There are two types of disappointments: a car that's supposed to be good that turns out to be bad, and a car that's supposed to be outstanding that turns out to be merely very good. 

The Ford Fiesta, which went on sale this summer as a 2011 model, was supposed to be a new type of subcompact car for the American market, bringing an unprecedented level of style, refinement, and driving enjoyment to a market segment where discount pricing tends to reign supreme. Extensive pre-launch marketing gave birth to this idea, and some reviewers have perpetuated it.

When Honda brought out the Fit subcompact hatchback, some called it a delightful little marvel of a car, comparing its handling abilities to sports cars'. Both the Fit and the Fiesta are better than average for what they are, but they are still subcompact economy cars.

These arch-rivals also emphasize different things. The Fit's strength is in its interior packaging; its seats fold in handy ways to open up a cargo hold that rivals some SUVs', and it holds four adults more comfortably than many midsize cars. But the Honda is cheap-feeling, with a buzzy engine, busy ride, and budget-grade interior. 

The Fiesta is a very good subcompact car. Its gas mileage is class-leading. It does have flashier looks inside and out than the competition, and solid build quality. (A base-model Fiesta sedan reviewed last month had a few lapses in its interior assembly; the high-end hatchback driven for this review did not.) It does drive better than most, with a firm but comfortable ride, strong pep off the line with the manual transmission, and agile handling.

On the Fiesta, the steering wheel should be smaller, and the steering should have quicker response and more feel. The manual transmission's tall gearshift and the shifter's somewhat long, vague throws are what you'd expect to find on a car where the stickshift is bought to save a few bucks rather than to make more of a driver's car. Again, the Fiesta is certainly no Accent or Yaris, but the potential was there for more. And while the arch-rival Fit doesn't do any better on the steering feel front, Honda did get the wheel and shifter right.But it's not super-sporty. You don't get the sense – as you do with some bargain-basement cars, like the Hyundai Accent or Toyota Yaris – that costs were cut by eliminating suspension engineering, but you also don't get the sense that Ford went the extra mile to make its littlest car zippy. The Fiesta doesn't stand out for its cargo space or flexibility, but it still comes closer to matching the feel – if not the interior room – of a bigger car. It feels substantial on the road, tracking well on the highway, avoiding excess noise and vibration from its little 1.6-liter engine, and feeling planted.

SIDEBAR: Fiesta S sedan

In Europe, where the Fiesta is most popular, few people buy small sedans. Because a sedan is essentially a hatchback with a trunk sticking off the end, it takes up more space on a crowded street -- an extra 13 inches, in the Fiesta's case.

While the hatchback picks up extra flexibility from having a wide-open cargo hold, the sedan usually puts its extra length to good use in offering more luggage room behind the rear seat. 

The difference is unusually skimpy in the Fiesta's case. While some subcompact hatchbacks have next to no usable cargo space behind the rear seat, this Ford does all right. What's more, the sedan's volume also comes mostly in its height rather than floor space, just like the hatchback's. (See photo in today's slideshow)

The sedan does have slightly better rear visibility; the hatchback offsets that with an advantage in rear-seat headroom.

The bigger reason to buy the Fiesta sedan over the hatchback is price. Sedans are hundreds of dollars less than comparably equipped hatchbacks, and only the sedan comes in a low-cost base S version.

But for offering more overall versatility with a minimal sacrifice, along with vastly superior parallel-parking space efficiency, it's hard to recommend the Fiesta sedan over the hatch unless you're going for the basic savings of the crank-windows model. 

Full review of the 2011 Ford Fiesta S sedan

Elsewhere in the interior, the Fiesta has firm, flat and narrow front seats that are acceptably spacious and comfortable, but the recline lever is hard to reach when the door is closed. The steering wheel adjusts easily for height and reach. There's good forward visibility and good-sized exterior mirrors with a built-in convex section for a better glance at the blind spot, but a poor view out over the shoulder. 

Two adults will have to squeeze to make their way in and out of the rear seat, but they'll by acceptably comfortable once they're in there. There isn't an excess of leg or head space, but it's not quite a shortage either. The seat cushion is mounted high and there's enough space for feet to sit under the front seats. Front and rear outboard armrests have padded elbow spots; most interior trim is otherwise hard but attractive and solid-feeling, though the doors slam junkily.

The stylish dash doesn't compromise the function of most controls, but two interior design issues need to be addressed. The cupholders, not uncommonly for cars designed in Europe, seem to shallow to safely accommodate a Supersize beverage. Less commonly, Ford eschewed lock buttons on the doors next to the handle; blank gray plastic occupies that real estate instead. The locks are instead operated by a button on the center stack next to the audio controls, with a small light (that washes out in bright sunlight) indicating whether the doors are open or locked. The button offers no conceivable advantage over a conventional setup and makes it unnecessarily difficult to tell whether doors are already locked. Putting a lock button on the blank spot next to each interior door handle would cost the interior none of its flair.

Moving rearward, the 15.4 cubic feet of cargo space the Fiesta offers behind the rear seat is usefully shaped for a subcompact hatchback, with decent floor space. The shape and dimensions of the room behind the rigid removable cargo cover is not that far off what's offered in the much longer Fiesta sedan, negating what should have been a major advantage to that car. (see sidebar) However, the cargo hold looks half-baked, as the sides of the cargo area don't line up with the rear seatbacks. 

Cargo design shortfalls extend to the folding of the rear seats. The folded seatbacks are several inches north of leaving a flush cargo floor and far from level. The front seats must be slid far forward or the rear head restraints removed to drop the rear seat down. Removing and reinstalling the rear head restraints must be done mid-fold, as the roof is too low for them to be be taken in and out with the seat in place. Total cargo volume is also unimpressive in an era of space-efficient subcompacts, and the back hatch opens to reveal a rather high, narrow opening. 

See more photos of the Fiesta in today's slideshow

The Fiesta hatchback isn't inexpensive for a subcompact car, starting at a $15,120 sticker price that dealers are unlikely to budge much from in the immediate future. As tested, this SES model adds standard power mirrors, cruise control, Ford's SYNC audio and cell-phone interface, and alloy wheels, plus a $410 collection of extra interior lighting, bringing the total MSRP to $18,205. An available sunroof, heated leather seats, and keyless starting system would push the asking price past $20,000 before someone's even sprung for the $1,070 automatic transmission. (Sedans are less expensive when comparably equipped, and there's a discount-level S model priced from around $13,000 – see sidebar for details.)

Is the Fiesta worth it? 

It offers the best driving dynamics of the subcompact car class, avoiding the stereotypes of blandness and of buzzy cheapness alike. The Honda Fit has successfully dodged the former and the Nissan Versa (which is arguably a size smaller) has eliminated the latter, but neither combines the two as well as the littlest Ford – or approaches its gas mileage.

It is still a very good subcompact car. It's not a pure sporty car that happens to be a little hatchback, like the much-pricier Mini Cooper; it doesn't have light-on-its-feet driving zip to win over someone who's prepared to spend more for something bigger. And it's not the best choice for someone who prioritizes practicality. 

But if you like a solid-feeling subcompact that drives well and offers top-notch gas mileage, you should definitely be looking at the Fiesta. 

And if you kept your expectations realistic, you won't be disappointed.

Vehicle tested: 2011 Ford Fiesta
Vehicle base price (MSRP): $13,320
Version tested: SES hatchback
Version base price
 (MSRP): $17,120
Vehicle price as tested (MSRP): $18,205
Estimated transaction price as tested: $17,417
Test vehicle provided by: Koons Ford of Annapolis, Md.

Key specifications:  
Length: 160.1 inches 
Width: 66.8 inches 
Height: 58.0 inches
Wheelbase: 98.0 inches
Weight: 2,537 pounds 
Cargo volume behind rear seat: 15.4 
Turning radius: 17.2 feet 
Engine: 1.6-liter I4 with 119 horsepower 
Transmission (as tested): 5-speed manual
EPA city mileage: 28 miles per gallon 
EPA highway mileage: 37 miles per gallon 
For more information: Ford website 

Advertisement

Slideshow: 2011 Ford Fiesta SES hatchback

By

Cars Examiner

Brady Holt, a Washington D.C. newspaper reporter, has had a lifelong fascination with cars and helping people choose one to buy. He'd like nothing...

Comments

  • "P" 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    The Fiesta is the perfect example of a car that was designed by a committee. The exterior design isn't that pleasing...with looks going from awkward to down right ugly. And Ford designed the car with form before function. As a result, the car is basically a two seater. Any COMPETENT manufacturer would know that with small, cheap little tin cans, you maximize space...Honda figured that out. The interior is a mess...the center stack is poorly designed, the HVAC controls could have been better, the lock switch is in the wrong place, the LCD screen looks terrible, etc. The engines are dogs, and the fuel economy is that of some Focus sized cars. And then you get to the areas where Ford cheapened the car...tin foil and glow sticks rather than proper fog lights, the projector headlights were also lost in the translation....and yet they are charging an arm and a leg for it.

    Had Ford been thinking, they would have taken the platform from Europe, and gave us a new body and interior.

  • Anonymous 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Dear P:
    You are entitled to your informed opinion. Have you driven this car?
    An arm and a leg? Do you at least make the minimum wage?
    Hmmmm....odds are you are a Chrysler salesperson, making the answers to the above No and Not Any More.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...