We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 54°F: Current condition: Mostly Cloudy See Extended Forecast

Direct mailers oppose 'devastating' new tax; legislator says it may violate TABOR provisions

House Bill 1189 faces a first committee hearing tomorrow afternoon.
House Bill 1189 faces a first committee hearing tomorrow afternoon.
Credits: 
Colorado State Flag

Local direct mailers say passage of a tax bill facing the Colorado General Assembly would hurt direct-mail marketers and their clients.

House Bill 1189, introduced by Jack Pommer, D-Boulder, vice chair of the Joint Budget Committee, is up for consideration tomorrow in the House Appropriations Committee.

It would eliminate state sales- and use-tax exemptions for direct-mail advertising materials. The bill would, however, allow local taxing authorities to continue exempting direct mailers from the tax.

The Senate sponsor is Boulder Democrat Rollie Heath.

“Any tax of this sort is bound to have a depressing effect on commerce,” said Patty Coldwater, marketing director of the Mail Room Inc., and a past president of the Rocky Mountain Direct Marketing Association.

The tax, Coldwater added, would unfairly target direct mail, since free-standing newspaper inserts are specifically exempted from the bill, which she said is intent on “finding yet another defenseless revenue source.”

The direct-mail bill is part of a package of significant tax increase proposals introduced by Democrats that would cost jobs and violate TABOR provisions, according to Brian DelGrosso, R-Loveland.

“Along with being illegal,” he said, “many of these new taxes will be devastating to businesses in Colorado and lead to higher unemployment, and many more years of poor economic conditions here in our state.”

Colorado Libertarians have listed the measure as one of the nine worst bills facing the 2010 Legislature.

Wednesday’s hearing starts at 1:30 p.m in Room A of the Legislative Services Building, across from the State Capitol.
___________
Please click on the SUBSCRIBE link at the top of the page to receive an email alert when new Economic Policy articles by Ed Swartley are available.

Advertisement

By

Aurora Economic Policy Examiner

Ed Swartley is a veteran of 12 years in daily newspaper journalism and 20 years as a marketing executive in education, banking and printing. The...

Comments

  • Say what? 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Say what? The bill summary says that "Commencing March 1, 2010, the bill eliminates the state sales and use tax exemption..." So, I don't think this is a tax increase, it is enforcing a tax break that has been in effect.

  • Ed Swartley 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    So, if a company paid $500 in taxes in 2009, and will pay $750 in 2010 because of this bill, that $250 is not a tax increase? We're ALL exempted from paying taxes ... until we have to pay them; when we have to pay them, that's a tax increase.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...