What do Henry Kissinger (a Republican), Bill Clinton, Al Gore, George Soros, and Barack Obama have in common?
Each has stated that they believe the way of the future is 'world governance' under some unnamed 'global authority,' which one can only assume is the United Nations.
For at least 2 decades the U.S. has gradually handed over bits and pieces of its national sovereignty to the United Nations by signing certain 'treaties' that allow international law to trump our own Constitution.
The latest example of this insidious growing cancer is the Obama Administration's report to the U.N. concerning 'human rights violations' by the state of Arizona.
According to a state department document, the Administration has requested that Arizona's new immigration law be placed 'under review' by the United Nations.
Arizona Governor Jan Brewer immediately condemned the report and asked that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton remove the request from the document.
The request is merely the latest in a series of eyebrow-raising statements and actions on the part of the Obama Administration concerning the Arizona law. Earlier an Administration official complained to the Chinese Communists about the law.
This is in addition to the Obama Administration's unprecedented decision to sue one of our own states over a law that mirrors federal law. The nation of Mexico has been allowed by the court in this case to file a brief in support of the Administration against Arizona.
3 key observations are essential to understanding the threat to U.S. sovereignty in these actions.
First, the U.N. has absolutely no jurisdiction whatsoever over a sovereign state within the United States of America. And, given the fact that nations with horrific human rights violations such as Cuba, North Korea, Communist China, Venezuela, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and many others are allowed to sit on human rights panels at the U.N., the fact that Arizona would even be mentioned is a sick farce.
Second, a foreign nation has no business being allowed to file a brief in a U.S. court of law against one of our own states. No one except for the most ardent, incorrigible globalist in favor of 'world governance' under the U.N. would even consider such an outrage.
Third, an honest, thorough examination of federal immigration law, as compared to the Arizona law, is critical. When placed side-by-side there is little difference except for the wording. The meaning is the same. The only difference is that the Arizona law gives the state the authority to ENFORCE federal law in the absence of federal enforcement.
Thus, is the Administration saying, in essence, that U.S. law itself is a 'human rights violation?'
The only difference between the federal government and the state government of Arizona is that the feds are not following the law. Had they been doing so, the Arizona law would have never even been considered.
With the vast majority of American citizens standing firm in support of Arizona's proactive stance in dealing with the lawless assault from the southern border, the Administration's disdain for U.S. sovereignty only confirms in the minds of voters that the U.S. government is presently dominated by extremists who believe that our own Constitution and laws must have the 'oversight' of a 'global authority.'
Be sure to catch my blog at The Liberty Sphere.
Comments
"Third, an honest, thorough examination of federal immigration law, as compared to the Arizona law, is critical. When placed side-by-side there is little difference except for the wording. The meaning is the same. The only difference is that the Arizona law gives the state the authority to ENFORCE federal law in the absence of federal enforcement."
Which is exactly what the courts are being asked to decide: IS there a difference with legal implications.
As for the rest, it's just bloviating. The short mention in the report to the UN simply states that the laws is being litigated.
NOT including a reference to such a public issue would leave the administration accused of attempting to hide the controversy.
BULL. We don't owe the U.N. a report on ANYTHING. So you must be a globalist yourself.
If we (the United States) agrees to join a group should we not abide by their requirements of membership? You could however base a strong argument using this position, for why we should not be a member nation. Furthermore, the United Nations is generally considered unfriendly to Israel by you and most conservatives. Most could/would find these to be compelling arguments.
Complying with the rules of an organization in which you are a member is rightfully expected and accepted and many will reasonably disagree. The arguments thus far, have not promoted the notion of globalism - lg
Mr Martin - Please demonstrate where the report "requested that Arizona's new immigration law be placed 'under review' by the United Nations." Could you please point me to the page where the report makes that request?
I don't have to because it's moot point. The report from the state department went directly to the Human Rights Commission REVIEW committee of the U.N. It is automatically entered under review.
Yes, the report is submitted for review. But the UN's ability to do anything about the AZ law? Nil. Duh.
Dolt, "under review" simply means looking for what to extract into the annual report that no one pays any attention to.
Your boogyman of the UN is really getting to be an old schtick - even your hero John bolton said the US would provide these annual reports to try and make the UN Human Rights Committee do what it was supposed to do.
No, Maggots, it is absolutely ludicrous and a travesty of liberty for the U.S. to submit any report on human rights to a committee where Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, and other enemies of human rights sit. The U.N. is a joke. Nobody said they would sue or try to do something. It is the principle of the matter, plus Obama, Kissinger, Gore, Soros, Clinton, and others have stated ON THE RECORD they WANT 'world governance' whether the U.N. at present has that power or not. That goes not mean they won't GET that power, especially with this gang of anti-American anti-freedom globalists in control of the U.S. government!
Obama's actions are in direct violation of the 11th. amendment......are we to loose this portion of OUR constitution much like we have with our 4th. amendment under the Patriot Act. Step by unconstitutional step the powers that have been and the powers that are in OUR nations capitol are erasing the very principles that this nation was founded on. Who needs martial law to take over a country when you can do it slowly without even firing a bullet !
Uh, how? I mean, specifically, how has anything Obama has done opened up the possibility of lawsuits against the states by non-US citizens? I think you're really over-reaching here, Phil.
WHAT violation, fruitcake?
It's a REPORT - a statement of what's happening in the US and what things the US Government is doing in the area of human rights.
A REPORT - Period.
Although it is required by our own laws as a member nation that ratified the UN Charter as a treaty, it carries no legal weight. It's simply a statement.
Now tell us all about those invisible UN troops staged all around the country.
he can't because everytime he tries to photograph those invisible UN troops, they take off in their spaceships with a "whooooooooooooooo" sound as they fly away.
Yes, we do owe the UN. As a member nation, that report is required to be submitted on a regular basis.
We adopted the UN Charter as a treaty. That makes it part of US law.
If you want to withdraw from the UN, make your argument. But unless and until we do, our own laws require us to abide by certain UN procedures.
Obamanoids......If you want an outside U.S. body governing OUR states I strongly suggest that you go live somewhere within the E.U. ! Barry O.'s actions violates states rights and the 11th. amendment......read it in it's entirety. If you idiots would only find out who it was and why it was that the U.N. was founded you'd understand why it is that NorthCom is running around OUR nation with the blue helmeted U.N. troops ! Your lord and master Barry O. has sat on the U.N.'s security Council as it's president....another direct violation of OUR laws. The laws of our nation supercede any laws or agreement with another nation or organization....period ! These right must not be infringed upon !
Another meaningless rant by Phil. Notice he couldn't even rationally respond to the prior comments about the supposed violations of the 11th amendment. He just responds with more paranoid rambling. I suppose that says a lot about the validity of his arguments.
Philly-willy claims to have once been a military intelligence analyst. Of course, he also claims to have been in Vietnam AND to have been a "Vietnam-Era Vet" - a term those of us from that era reserve for people who served during the designated period of Vietnam conflict but never served IN Vietnam - which suggests Phil is, at least, seriously confused and more likely telling falsehoods.
Long standing since Fm 41-10's creation U.N. troops have been training in the U.S. along side NorthCom....one needs to learn the internet to know this though. How about search engine this....U.N. troops train in the U.S. ....or.....U.N. troops stationed in the U.S..... or....U.N. forces in U.S.A./F.E.M.A. Authority. Maybe you can familiarize yourselves with HR 645 and it's intent . The internet is full of documentation on U.N. troops training and being stationed in the U.S. ! Barry O. has no business taking OUR immigration issues before the U.N. ! Barry O. has a propensity to override constitutional law at the drop of a hat thanks to surrounding himself with "yes" men like Holder and Emanuel....in this case, when he fears he can't get his way here in the good old U.S.A. he runs off to the U.N.'s Human Rights Council where he is well received because of his most definite socialist leanings, where approval of his complaint(s) by it's council members will be given, and these members are a joke to begin with ....just consider the nations they represent. What a joke Barry O. is and the idiots who follow him !
The Internet is full of MISinformation on bull like this - much like your own head is full of it, Philly.
IF you're really a Veteran, please take yourself to the VA - they've got some medications that would do you a world of good.
Northcom didn't even exist when 41-10 was written.
You really need to learn how to check your sources.
Just knew he'd bring up the invisible UN troops, didn't you?
Infer what you will, and bypass the main issue of this article which is the intent of Barry O. and the immigration issue. You only need to ask why it is that Barry O. even takes OUR issue of Immigration before the U.N. Human rights council for litigation....and then what ? Is the U.N. going to decide immigration rights for the U.S. and perhaps all nations of the world. Are nations to have no sovereignty ? Are all aspects of sovereignty to be decided by the U.N. ? Another point is that NorthCom does train with U.N. forces here in the U.S., FM 41-10 played a pivotal roll in this happening and U.N. forces are stationed here in the U.S. as per the info I left for you....perhaps you need to get your facts straight or take your globalist/socialist views somewhere else !
"You only need to ask why it is that Barry O. even takes OUR issue of Immigration before the U.N. Human rights council for litigation"
I actually asked just that question above. Where does the report ask the UN to "litigate" or "review" the issue? Please, show me where. Because I've searched the document and can't find it.
UN forces WHERE, fruitcake?
Bases, photos, video - SOMETHING to support your ridiculous claims.
By your own admission, you've been avoiding anything to do with the military for more than 35 years - why should we believe anything you claim when you show ZERO evidence except other Internet fantasies?
Never have any doubts about my military career, I did serve my nation, Vietnam 68-69, MAC-V as a liaison under General Creighton Abrams....commander of all forces involved...he replaced General Westmoreland. I might add that I still have the unsmoked cigar that Abrams gave me at our first meeting back in August of 68. Your trying to side track the issues at hand by doubting my devotion to OUR nation and my service to our nation only shows your weakness. My service to this nation goes on to this very day by dealing with non patriots and idiots like you ! Get lost scum !
Like I said, then: Go to the VA. They've got some really good meds these days for PTSD and the related paranoia.
What do you idiots think the U.N. is going to do with Barry O.'s case before the U.N.....litigation and then it might go through binding arbitration...outside our courts....you think their going to just sit there and look at it and comment....or perhaps use it as toilet paper as it should be!
Where do you come up with this stuff? You really think an informational report like this is going to be used as a basis for any type of litigation? Seriously? At the most, the UN will make recommendations on changes to our laws that will help improve our record on human rights. But any changes to our own laws would have to be drafted by and passed by Congress. So what exactly are you so afraid of?
The UN is going to do NOTHING with it other than include the statements in their annual report on human rights, you freakin' idiot.
You know, the report that everyone wrings their hands about for one 24-hour news cycle then ignores the rest of the year?
Phil--I see the idiotic numbskulls of the Leftwing globalist brigade have descended upon you like paratroopers from the 3rd Reicht. Why does the U.S. need to report to the U.N. about ANYTHING in this SOVEREIGN nation?
Um, because we're a member of an international organization called the United Nations. And members of said group agreed in resolution 60/251 to the creation of the Human Rights Council and the Universal Periodic Review process.
Sure, we were one of 4 nations who voted against it but John Bolton said "the United States will work cooperatively... to make the Council as strong and effective as it can be," and "We remain committed to support the UN’s historic mission to promote and protect the basic human rights of all the world’s citizens."
Allow me to repeat:
Yes, we do owe the UN. As a member nation, that report is required to be submitted on a regular basis.
We adopted the UN Charter as a treaty. That makes it part of US law.
If you want to withdraw from the UN, make your argument. But unless and until we do, our own laws require us to abide by certain UN procedures.
Listen, SCUM-SUCKER - Unless and until the US withdraws from the UN, it is LEGALLY REQUIRED to submit this pablum report.
So you are advocating the US violate its own laws and the international treaty it ratified - making you a man of flexible principles, it appears.
How does this "Report this" thing work? Oh, nice. Let me do this for all of Mr Martin's comments where he's calling people names. He he he.
Not to worry, Mr Martin. I reported all of them prior to posting that. You can't delete them now in the hopes the Examiner won't find out about your tactics.
Oh you better believe Ieft them all up. I didn't start this slug fest. The first shots were fired when you ANONYMOUS cowards starting slinging your insults at a regular poster here...who, by the way, is an honorable American Patriot--which you have trashed.
I am not going to mince my words when dealing with individuals such as you.
Ah, if you didn't delete them then the Examiner is censoring you. Better be careful, Mr Martin. They're watching you!
Yeah, Martin's attack calling me a MAGGOT disappeared, while my SCUM-SUCKER response remains - creating the false impression I started the epithets.
Typical of the lying conserva-fakes.
Don't worry...for all the comments of his that I reported I suggested they monitor his behavior. His belligerence towards those that express contrary opinions is a recurring theme here.
Be my guest. I welcome it. I only respond with belligerence to the belligerent. And Examiner knows this since I have reported each and every example of it in the comment section on a regular basis for quite a number of months. But keep on. This behavior will get you completely banned if you persist.
Oh, and by the way, the one who said i deleted the post where I referred to anonymous coward as a 'maggot' is still up there, if anyone bothers to read. I said that in response to the despicable manner in which these comments were maligning a true American Patriot who posts here on a regular basis. Examiner knows THAT too!
"Oh, and by the way, the one who said i deleted the post where I referred to anonymous coward as a 'maggot' is still up there, if anyone bothers to read. I said that in response to the despicable manner in which these comments were maligning a true American Patriot who posts here on a regular basis. Examiner knows THAT too!"
You LIE, MARTIN!!!!
The comment in question was immediately after my perfectly reasonable and polite post:
"
Allow me to repeat:
Yes, we do owe the UN. As a member nation, that report is required to be submitted on a regular basis.
We adopted the UN Charter as a treaty. That makes it part of US law.
If you want to withdraw from the UN, make your argument. But unless and until we do, our own laws require us to abide by certain UN procedures."
You responded starting with MAGGOT - all caps - and called me a TRAITOR to boot.
Quite the accusation from a 4F draft dodger, actually.
Yep ....just like Hillary's Small Arms Treaty agreement....wake up ! Do you think that for one minute that our current Congress has OUR interest at heart or previous congresses, or for that matter recent presidencies? The U.N. is a globalist organization ran by globalist . Barry O. is a socialist but more importantly a globalist puppet bought, owned and operated by the worlds power elitist . One only needs to consider who it was that founded the U.N., the C.F.R., the Trilateral Commission etc, and the known statements by high ranking current members of these various organizations, to know that it's a one world government that their after. How does one go about creating a European Union....or a North American Union....get rid of the borders, create one form of currency as with the Euro dollar....and then there's that issue of citizens having weapons. OUR southern border has disintegrated, border patrols have been pulled back, and all is not hunky dory as OUR F.E.M.A. czar would leave you to believe ....much like all that oil in the gulf. If the same efforts were put on our border that was put into the oil spill, Barry wouldn't need to go to the U.N. and we wouldn't be having this conversation. So you must ask why nothing is being done on OUR border....why is it that the situation there only gets worse. Why is it that Barry and his predecessors continually and deliberately fail our nation on the border issue(s)? We are being invaded. Are OUR borders not sovereign ? Does our current immigration policies not apply. Is there now no such thing as illegal immigration. Who does this situation serve....not me , nor OUR nation ! Are we going to just sit here and wait for findings (?) of the U.N.'s Human Rights Council....how long will that take....if indeed that's all that happens with Barry O.'s mission to the U.N. There's another agenda at play here....have no doubts!
And just where IS that small arms agreement, fruitcake?
Why.... NO WHERE. Not likely to even get a vote in the UN, much less ever be proposed as a treaty to the US Senate - which would reject it out of hand.
Your paranoia knows no bounds. does it?
PHILesq at the VA physiatrist, "I see invisible UN people......"
Anthony.....yes indeed.....most of whom that won't respond to the issue(s) have the unmitigated gall to question my service to this nation. I'm an oath keeper... as a young man I swore before GOD that I would defend this nation from all enemies both foreign and domestic ! I'm 63 now and that promise to GOD and OUR nation still stands and it will till my last breath. These idiots hold the U.N. and any agreement we have with that globalist organization above the sovereignty of OUR nation. It's owned and operated by globalist....it's an organization..... not a nation ! Anyway....good article Anthony......it's hard for some to see and consider that which is at the tip of their nose !
Too bad you have no clue what that oath means, though.
You've made it clear you think the First Amendment is garbage and like all the fake conservatives you're willing to through out any part of the constituion that results in something you do not like.
Big bad REMF in 'Nam trying to live on past dreams of glory. The fact you were a "liaison" to Abrams shows you never saw any real combat.
Try some infantry, REMF.
oath keepers are this country's SS...they need to be rounded up for taking an oath to each other instead of to the office they have been hired to.
......and Anonymous....you need to go to the proctologist to have your head removed from your arse ....or perhaps you'd like to keep it in there seeing that it's all nice and cozy , warm and secure.....kinda like the feeling your lord and master Barry O. gives you when your on you knees before him !
Once again, you show you're a REMF. Any real soldier would have said "get your head out of your fourth point of contact."
Anonomous......"yes we do owe the U.N."....just like the agreement reached in the U.N. by the U.S. and most of the other countries that when it's chartered W.H.O. declares a pandemic all nations must follow the U.N./W.H.O.'s accord and guide lines.......just like in the H1N1 scam....you remember don't you..... the shots that originally had thimerosal (mercury) and squalene in them....the one's that they wanted to give to our children and pregnant women first. Vaccines that were manufactured by China owned companies, and companies that Rumsfield, Cheney and yes even your lord and master Barry O. have stocks in. China...the same country who provides us with tainted paint toys for our kids, and provides us with drywall that's corrosive and harmful to our health. China who mass murders their citizens, who has killed hundreds of thousands of Tibetans, including monks and nuns ! I guess it's o.k. with you that they sit on the U.N.'s Human Rights Council and "YOUR" president wants their opinion on human rights/ immigration in OUR country. I guess in your world all is justified, and anything a bureaucrat, or a council at the U.N. tells you to do is just fine because "they", not you, agreed to it ! Whats the matter ...can't think for yourself and have to rely on someone else to do it for you....you can't discern from whats right and whats wrong! You and your ilk need to get educated in the ways of the real world and get away from whatever sources that provide you with what you perceive to be knowledge.
Pages
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!