“A legally binding, global Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) is being prepared in the back rooms of the UN,” a new analysis by researchers Paul Gallant, Alan Chwick and Joanne D. Eisen warns. “One goal of the Treaty's proponents is to create national weapon databases, leading to regional databases, and then to an eventual global database.”
“Countries will be charged with the duty to keep track, not only of all transfers,” we are told, “but also of the locations of all arms and ammunition, from manufacture to destruction.”
What will the database contain and track?
[S]mall arms must be marked on at least three - and in many cases - six parts: the frame, barrel, firing pin, ejector, extractor and magazine. And some firearm-prohibitionist groups suggest that the slide should be marked, as well. As each weapon – or each part - crosses a national border, an additional marking would need to be added. "Secondary markings" will add another layer of complexity.
Bear in mind that none of this will impact those who choose to ignore the “law” in the least.
“Even in relatively developed countries, the present condition of weapon databases is a nightmare,” Gallant, Chwick and Eisen point out, citing significant error rates in Canada, Australia and the United States. Indeed, as Gun Rights Examiner reported in the Friesen case, the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record (NFRTR) maintained by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to keep track of Title II weapons, “is insufficient for criminal proceedings” according to leading criminologist Dr. Fritz Scheuren in testimony before the 10th District Court.
The abbreviation “GIGO” comes to mind: Garbage In, Garbage Out. Which may be why an ATF manager claimed they routinely commit perjury over database accuracy…
While passage of an anti-gun global treaty by the Constitutionally-required congressional supermajority seems politically unfeasible at the present, an Obama victory in 2012, where he does not need to worry about reelection, could significantly amplify the threat—particularly if Democrat-Lite Republicans continue squandering the gains they made in the last election and alienating their core constituencies.
The GIGO concept applies to more than data, it would seem.
Oh, and in answer to the title question, speaking only for myself: No way in hell. How about you?
Click here to read “A Global Weapons Computer?” by Gallant, Chwick and Eisen. Then share the link with your friends.
Also see:
- Hillary Clinton's State Department reanimates global arms treaty
- Will Arms Trade Treaty reduce human rights violations in Africa?
- Whose Watchdog?
- Researchers challenge UN Arms Trade Treaty gun death claims
- If we can't trust ATF under oath, when can we trust them?
- Why ATF folded in Friesen case
------------
Help wanted--inquire within
Regular readers: If you agree that mainstream press coverage of the gun rights issue demands a counter-balance, please help me spread the word by sharing Gun Rights Examiner links with your friends via emails, and in online discussion boards, blogs, etc. (Also note “Share” options, below.) Then get more commentary at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance.
Comments