Skip to main content
  1. News
  2. Business & Finance
  3. Industry

WildTangent v Ultramercial: SCOTUS will hold until Alice v CLS decided

See also

Examiner has confirmed that WildTangent v Ultramercial will be held over until after the Alice v CLS case is heard and decided in 2014.

Scotusbloggers confirm case will be held over

Mary Pat Dwyer and Tom Goldstein of Scotusblog have confirmed to the Examiner that WildTangent v Ultramercial will be held over until after a decision in Alice v CLS in 2014. As reported earlier, both Alice and WildTangent were set for conference on Friday, December 6. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to Alice the same day, but was silent on WildTangent.

According to Ms. Dwyer, last week the Court called for a response in WildTangent v Ultramercial. Pending the response, the Court will hold WildTangent over as we have indicated.

The cases in lower court

CLS Bank was accused of infringing an Alice patent to a system of international trading that reduced transactional risk between traders in multiple time zones. WildTangent was accused of infringing an Ultramercial patent to a system that serves up free content to users who sit through an ad first.

CLS prevailed, but the opinion was so divided that it did not generate a legally binding precedent. This fact manifested itself very quickly when the same Court decided not to invalidate the Ultramercial patent in the WildTangent case. Two members of the three member panel in WildTangent were in the minority in the CLS case, which was heard en banc.

Decisions at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) are now said to be "panel dependent." In other words, in a subject matter eligibility case, the outcome you get is largely determined by which Judges are sitting on the panel.

The appeals

The plaintiff, Alice, appealed the invalidation of its patent to the Supreme Court. Numerous amici also argued that the case should be taken in order to clarify the law in this area. WildTangent, on the other hand, appealed the lower court's decision not to invalidate the advertising method patent. Amici also weighed in on that case.

Silicon Valley and software patents

As previously reported, both cases are being carefully watched in Silicon Valley, as the risk of software patent litigation figures ever more prominently in executive decision making. In addition to litigation, much attention has been focused on the reform efforts presently making their way through Congress.

Implications

One possible outcome would be that after Alice v CLS is decided in 2014, WildTangent v Ultramercial will be remanded back to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The lower Court would be asked to reconsider in light of the new decision in Alice v CLS.

The Examiner will be producing future reports on the matter in coming days. Stay tuned.

Advertisement

News

  •  One year later
    How victims have recovered a year after the Boston Marathon bombing
    Video
    Watch Video
  • Tax day freebies
    Everyone dreads tax day, but some businesses are offering deals today only
    Tax Day
  • Obamacare savings
    The rollout of Obamacare will cost $104 billion less than previously projected
    Top News
  • Blood Moon
    The first of four 'Blood Moons' came and went; is it the beginning of the end for mankind?
    Headlines
  • Arrest for threatening tweet
    A 14-year-old girl is arrested for issuing a threatening tweet towards American Airlines
    Strange News
  • Pistorius cross examination concludes
    Oscar Pistorius sheds more tears during the trial's final cross examination
    Video
    Watch Video

User login

Log in
Sign in with your email and password. Or reset your password.
Write for us
Interested in becoming an Examiner and sharing your experience and passion? We're always looking for quality writers. Find out more about Examiner.com and apply today!