
Respond respectfully to media requests
I know why reporters and producers can't stand people trying to get on their shows and in their publications. They are SO annoying! I remember the cartoon character Charlie Brown saying, "I love humanity, it's people I can't stand." That's the way I feel at this moment.
I was kind of shocked at some of the responses I received from people responding to my queries for upcoming columns I'm working on for The Huffington Post and Psychology Today.
People didn't pay attention to what I asked for and one even admitted that he wasn't answering my need. This is called answering "off topic" and can get you instantly banned from services like http://www.helpareporter.com which was one of the free services I used to post my query or request.
The other thing that struck me was the discrepancy between people's responses and their websites. I sometimes had a favorable response to someone's initial email and then was mortified by their website and vice versa. Sometimes their thoughtfulness intrigued me, but their website photo repelled me. Other times while their credentials impressed me, their schlocky nature of their approach full of typos and truncated sentences put me off. The opposite was true as well.
One well-heeled professional who had a client list of famous and prestigious people told me exactly how he wanted his byline in the piece I was writing to appear. While I recommend that you always ask to be listed by how you prefer, it came off as glib and bossy, not to mention premature.
I talk a lot about that everything that you do, say, are and think from your words to your website need to be in alignment (tm), and my experience asking for experts deepened my conviction about the importance of being completely congruent.
To give producers and reporters that warm fuzzy feeling that makes them want to pick up the phone and call you instead of your competitor and avoid giving them agita (Italian word for indigestion) avoid these common mistakes.
1. Hello out there!
How can I find you? Most people didn't give me their full contact information. I know this sounds ludicrous, but not only did people not include their website or phone number, but they often had a gmail, hotmail or other free account so even when I tried to Google them I couldn't find their website. Maddening. One PR person didn't even leave her name! (This frightens me deeply).
Please give the media every single option you have to get in touch with you and let them choose the medium they prefer. Include your phone, cell, email, website, blog, facebook, and a direct link to your media page. And, need I say it, your full name?
2. Just call me.
A few people said things like, "Call me, I'm happy to talk to you and answer your questions." No. I asked you questions in my query that I wanted you to answer so I could determine if I wanted to talk to you. You need to give me a reason to WANT to get more information. It's called a tease. A few people gave me general, boring information that anyone in their field could have supplied.
On the other hand you don't want to give me everything because then I won't need to call you. Just give me enough to peak my interest. And please give me answers to the questions I asked.
3. My life story blah, blah, blah.
There were others who gave out too much information. Stuff that may be interesting in another context, but wasn't what I asked for. I'm on a deadline and I only want the information that I requested.
4. You're stu.pid.
In my query, as an example of what I wanted, I quoted research from another source and one person told me that it was "ludicrous". Well, that got my attention, but it didn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling about him. I suspect he did it for the shock value. That worked. He had some interesting things to say, but I may or may not contact him. Is he rash or bullheaded? Not sure if I can take someone so flip seriously.
5. I have a friend who...
People wrote in to tell me to contact their friend, but don't tell me why he/she would be right for my story. Just that he/she would be perfect for me. Why would I believe a stranger who is biased?
6. Are there specific questions you need answered?
Uh, yeah. Don't ask me this when I listed several in the query. Very specifically, actually. This person answered my query very briefly, but didn't address my particular questions, which, if a reporter asks, you should. They ask because they want to know. It's how we determine whether you qualify for what we need.
7. Let me tell you about me.
Please don't give me background that has nothing to do with what I'm asking. A PR company -- who should know better -- proposed their client and then went on for two paragraphs about the real estate firm's accomplishments where their client worked. I asked for a powerful woman doing martial arts to discuss the impact it had on her body image, personal and professional life. What does this have to do with what I'm interested in. Nothing.
Why should I care that the company "completed commercial leasing transactions totaling over 10 million square feet and valued at over $1.6 billion." Now if the PR person had connected that in some way to the personal success of his client's training in martial arts he would have gotten my interest.
8. Read this.
Some people told me that they were experts and then referred me to other people's articles. While this was helpful overall, it wasn't helpful in terms of me evaluating them to see if they would be the right expert for my story. I asked for research and studies, but I wanted to talk to the people who had done them. Why would I use a secondary source if I could go to the original one? Plus, if you're going to send me to a link I need to know why. Tell me the topic of the story and why it would interest me. Better yet, tell me how that article or research is connected to you and what you do.
9. Hi, I'm famous.
A few famous people (what, they don't have to play by the rules?) had their assistant or PR person contact me saying that they were available to be interviewed. They didn't explain why their boss/client was an expert but gave me a link to an article or two that they had written.
I don't want to have to plow through tons of material to see if this expert is right for me. YOU need to convince ME that I should talk to you. Just because you're famous doesn't get you off the hook for showing me that you're the expert I need. Because, guess what? Lots of famous experts are vying for my time who sent me just what I needed to inspire me to call them.
Besides, I'm not going to call you because your famous, I'm going to call you if you have the information that I need. And you don't need to be famous to be the expert that I will use. So please follow the producer or journalist's instructions EXACTLY and you'll become a pleasure instead of a pain.
Follow me online
Social media is about making connections. Connect with me on the following social media sites. Facebook Fan Page - Twitter - Examiner.com - Facebook - LinkedIn - YouTube - Psychology Today - Huffington Post - Biznik - Hubpages
Join the Cosmic Mending Kit Ning Group
A community of people devoted to creating beauty, art and peace in the world beginning with themselves.
Have A Topic Idea?
I'd love to hear it! Just email me any time here and let me know what topics you'd like to know more about.













Comments
While I agree with majority of what you are saying, I also feel compelled to remind you that you serve the readers. If that means doing more work than you would like to in order to meet the "deadline", then I guess you should do it.
Welcome to the work world the majority of us have to deal with on a daily basis. The world of "Do whatever it takes".
Excellent, informative and useful article.
In the very last paragraph "your famous" should be "you're famous"
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!