Skip to main content
  1. News
  2. Politics
  3. Government

Why did HHS and Obama select CGI for

See also

A fellow Examiner, Kevin Fobbs, published an article in October 2013: “Why Did Obama’s HHS Officials Select Canadian CGI that Botched Obamacare Launch?”

More Photos

Fobbs reported that CGI had a checkered past in developing healthcare systems in Canada. When the American economy and American business so desperately needs work, why did the procurement geniuses at HHS go out of the nation for assistance?

That demands review of HHS procurement policies and procedures. Experience in government contracting proves that every procurement, large or small, has a degree of politics and manipulation associated with decisions. Some are cleaner procurements than others, but the process is always ripe for manipulation.

Going out of the nation for government healthcare systems services is just plain goofy for many reasons:
In the instance of CGI, experience in Canada does not compute with building a system in the USA. We have a different culture, laws and regulations, distributed among 50 states and territories.

  • At a time when the American economy was struggling, it makes sense to keep government work in the pool of
  • American contractors. (Even if it wasn’t struggling, that might be the preference anyway.)
  • American technology and information systems contractors need the business and opportunity to address state of the art requirements.

Now, there are consistently flawed approaches in government contracting having to do with spreading work around among “small businesses” especially those owned by minority and protected classes. Don’t get me started on that topic.

It isn’t that small contractors should not have the opportunity, but in our system, large and small contractors are not required to demonstrate the viability by serving commercial customers first. Commercial business success should be a prerequisite to serving government customers, don’t you think?

"CGI Federal may have been fired from its role as contractor on the disastrous $678 million Obamacare enrollment website, but American taxpayers are not done paying millions of dollars to the disgraced company, courtesy of the Obama administration department that hired it to build HealthCare.Gov."

If Darrell Issa truly wants to light a fire under an issue that will burn baby burn, investigate the CGI procurement. It is smoking.

“OH CGI - By early December, the Obama administration had lost confidence in the contractor that built, says a 10-page document quietly posted by federal officials this week. "The document indicates that CMS officials lost faith that CGI could complete critical behind-the-scenes construction of the Obamacare website by mid-March, a critical deadline to ensure the stability of the health law and the insurance market," Pro's Kyle Cheney reports. Officials recently replaced CGI with Accenture as lead contractor on the website. The document: The Pro story:




  • Mt. Everest avalanche
    Disaster strikes Mt. Everest as at least 12 people were killed in an avalanche
    Watch Video
  • Most Earthlike planet discovered
    The Kepler telescope has discovered the most Earthlike, possibly habitable planet yet
    Space News
  • Easter crosses create debate
    Easter crosses spark a debate of separation of church and state in Ohio
  • Chelsea Clinton is preggers
    Former first daughter Chelsea Clinton is pregnant with her first child
  • Stanley Cup playoffs
    The battle for Lord Stanley's Cup is on, don't miss a minute of playoff action
  • Ukraine discussed amongst U.S., E.U., Russia
    The U.S., E.U. and Russia agree on ways to diffuse the tension in Ukraine
    Watch Video

User login

Log in
Sign in with your email and password. Or reset your password.
Write for us
Interested in becoming an Examiner and sharing your experience and passion? We're always looking for quality writers. Find out more about and apply today!