Skip to main content
  1. News
  2. Politics
  3. Government

Why did HHS and Obama select CGI for Healthcare.gov?

See also

A fellow Examiner, Kevin Fobbs, published an article in October 2013: “Why Did Obama’s HHS Officials Select Canadian CGI that Botched Obamacare Launch?”

More Photos

Fobbs reported that CGI had a checkered past in developing healthcare systems in Canada. When the American economy and American business so desperately needs work, why did the procurement geniuses at HHS go out of the nation for assistance?

That demands review of HHS procurement policies and procedures. Experience in government contracting proves that every procurement, large or small, has a degree of politics and manipulation associated with decisions. Some are cleaner procurements than others, but the process is always ripe for manipulation.

Going out of the nation for government healthcare systems services is just plain goofy for many reasons:
In the instance of CGI, experience in Canada does not compute with building a system in the USA. We have a different culture, laws and regulations, distributed among 50 states and territories.

  • At a time when the American economy was struggling, it makes sense to keep government work in the pool of
  • American contractors. (Even if it wasn’t struggling, that might be the preference anyway.)
  • American technology and information systems contractors need the business and opportunity to address state of the art requirements.

Now, there are consistently flawed approaches in government contracting having to do with spreading work around among “small businesses” especially those owned by minority and protected classes. Don’t get me started on that topic.

It isn’t that small contractors should not have the opportunity, but in our system, large and small contractors are not required to demonstrate the viability by serving commercial customers first. Commercial business success should be a prerequisite to serving government customers, don’t you think?

"CGI Federal may have been fired from its role as contractor on the disastrous $678 million Obamacare enrollment website, but American taxpayers are not done paying millions of dollars to the disgraced company, courtesy of the Obama administration department that hired it to build HealthCare.Gov."

http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/15/five-cms-contracts-that-cgi-federal-still-somehow-holds/

If Darrell Issa truly wants to light a fire under an issue that will burn baby burn, investigate the CGI procurement. It is smoking.

“OH CGI - By early December, the Obama administration had lost confidence in the contractor that built HealthCare.gov, says a 10-page document quietly posted by federal officials this week. "The document indicates that CMS officials lost faith that CGI could complete critical behind-the-scenes construction of the Obamacare website by mid-March, a critical deadline to ensure the stability of the health law and the insurance market," Pro's Kyle Cheney reports. Officials recently replaced CGI with Accenture as lead contractor on the website. The document: http://politico.pro/1j4eQ0S The Pro story:http://politico.pro/1dbkEjo

Politico

Advertisement

News

  •  Day 17
    Israel continues their ravaging bombardment on Gaza as the conflict wages on
    Video
    Video
  • MH17 victims arrive home
    40 bodies of the MH17 plane crash return to a somber homecoming in Holland
    Top News
  • Military advisers to Ukraine
    President Obama announces the deployment of military advisers to Ukraine
    Politics
  • Bubonic plague in China
    A bubonic plague outbreak in Yumen prompts China to quarantine the city
    World News
  • Air Algierie disappearance
    A flight headed from Burkina Faso to Algeria disappears from radar over Mali
    Headlines
  • Windows Phone training portal
    Microsoft launches Windows Phone training portal in attempt to woo consumers
    Tech