Ron Paul has claimed that he receives more money from active duty military than all of the other remaining Republican candidates put together. Many people who believe the pundits when they insist Paul's foreign policy is dangerous and naive wonder if Paul's claim is true. Well, it is.
In fact, Paul was being modest; he could have further detailed that he actually received five times more than Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum (from January 2011 to September 2011) -- put together. You can even throw in military donations for Obama in with the Republican candidates, and Paul still beats all of them. It was the same story for Paul in 2007-2008. In the fourth quarter of 2007 alone, Paul raised $212,000 from active military; Obama was second with $94,000. Mitt Romney's top three donors during the 2012 campaign season came from Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse Group, and Morgan Stanley. Ron Paul's top three? Army, Navy, and Air Force.
I remember watching that video and cheering because I could not believe there was a candidate that could talk plainly about fiscal issues and foreign policy in a way that reflected my beliefs -- that we should stop spending money we don't have, and we should stop being the policeman of the world!
Many people say they disagree with Ron Paul on his "foreign policy." They seem to think for some reason that he wants to turn our back on Israel and ignore Iran. This couldn't be further from the truth. He believes that we should stop providing aid to all countries for political purposes. For example, we give Israel billions in aid and then give their adversaries billions more in aid. We destabilize regions when we overthrow regimes, install puppet governments only to turn around years later and overthrow them again.
Ron Paul is the only candidate that acknowledges the fact that our actions around the world have repercussions, or "blow back." For example, the 9/11 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia. They stated their reason for attacking America was because of our military bases in the "holy lands" of Saudi Arabia. However, Americans were told they attacked us because of our prosperity and freedom. This is simply not the case. How would we feel if the Chinese or Iranians had bases in America? I suspect that some of us would go to extremes to make them realize we want them out of our country.
I think Ron Paul will be the most unifying president this country has ever seen and for all the right reasons. He is a leader with integrity and honesty -- this is a pretty alien concept in our culture. All Americans will benefit from a Paul presidency. The only ones that won't are selling something or addicted to the status quo.
We should strive for peace and commerce with all, entangling alliances with none. When a country threatens our national security we go to war with a constitutional declaration of war. When we want to hunt down terrorists, we do so with constitutional Letters of Marque and Reprisal.















Comments