Most recently many had got an e-mail that “Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology” has been published and were excited for the great project of Claire Smith. However, it looks the joy ended with the first e-mail, since already the first citation seen online of this publication shows that archaeology is fat away from global approach at all. Global means moral, high standard, commitment to quality and honesty. Global does not mean fraud and psychotronic terrorism.
However, the “Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology” is cited probably the first by Bisserka Gajdarska in her list of publication at “The Time of Their Lives: on the Web”. Of, course such author with documented fraud and known as a psychotronic terrorist will cite first because all her publications are to cover specific social behavior in science which related to crime and corruption. But why was she included in the team of authors who participated because of Claire Smith known at least in past as a moral person? Why didn’t Smith clearly indicate in her message gathering authors that she was not anymore the moral global archaeologist, but a person who what to promote crime, corruption, amorality and even psychotronic terrorism in archaeology. the Encyclopedia costs abt $7 K hard copy and & 5,7 K e-reference - all to promote as a member of a team an author who had been committed to fraud and had been known as a psychotronic terrorist?! Is this Smith all about - to sign a book on "global" without having even any idea what is global about? Global means moral, for information of Claire Smith. At least this is the American understanding.
Who is Gajdarska is very clear from the last fabricated website where she is in a project for which does not have any knowledge and again in included because of intrigue makers in archaeology who obviously have been attempting to have impact on increasing of the process of corruption and criminalization of archaeology. This is exactly what the treasure-hunters and collectors want to be able to enrich themselves.
It looks like “Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology” is just new wasting of money and energy of the serious authors like me who believed that participate in a serious project. Now instead all feel that overtrusted Smith and without knowing had contributed to reproduction of corruption and crime in archaeology.