Evidence is growing that the White House is so sensitive about stories in the media concerning the issue of Presidential eligibility that reporters have been warned of dire consequences if they merely ask questions about the subject.
A White House insider has reported that the subject is so highly sensitive that reporters must 'tread softly' and 'be very careful' if they dare delve into Obama's background.
There is also information that suggests mainstream media sources now have all of the facts about the issue but intend to go on the offensive in protecting Obama at all costs. In the insider's own words,
Can’t respond much at this time. Too busy with all of the chaos coming at us these days. May be out of work soon! Crazy stuff. Simply urge you to lay off the birther angle at this time. Strongly urge. To proceed is at your own peril. Please take warning seriously. This is not a small town cop shop situation here. Let someone else try and make name on this one.
Don’t blame you as it was me who brought up subject last time. Since then heard repeated rumors/confirmations of attempted “purge” coming down the pike. WH/media going on the offensive bigtime on issue. Has already started as you probably know. Talking very specific, very confrontational, very scary stuff here. Don’t wish to drag you into that. Much bigger fish are circling this. They can survive what could be coming. Not sure about me. Let the big players handle this now. This thing will either break out big or disappear.
However, the bombshell evidence of the willingness of the Obama team to engage in threats and intimidation over the eligibility issue is encapsulated in a 2009 special report documenting outright media manipulation by the White House. According to the report,
...extremely sensitive investigative documents, including a stunning written admission by a nationally known talk show host stating that he was threatened with his career – or worse – should he talk about the issue of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth records to a national audience. This document was obtained on December 10, 2008, and provides explicit detail of a “gag order” imposed on this host before and immediately following the national election last November.
That, however, is only the tip of the iceberg. The report also contains this stunning admission by an administrative assistant within a major news network in New York:
From multiple interviews conducted within the last eight months, we have obtained information from other sources, independent of the above, who have also been instructed to avoid any discussion of the birth certificate issue at all costs, to wit:
The account of an administrative assistant employed in New York City by a cable network news station who provided significant, detailed information of a 2008 meeting between the top network executive and four-(4) well-known news anchors. This source confirmed that she drafted the memo to the various hosts to arrange notify them of the date, time and location of this high-level meeting at the request of the network’s top executive.
Present at this meeting, she verified that the network official issued “warnings” to the personalities “to avoid any on-air discussion of the birth place, eligibility, and news accounts of litigation compelling [Barack Hussein] Obama to produce a legitimate copy of his birth certificate.” She stated that the network executive had her arrange the conference immediately following a meeting “between [the network executive] and an attorney closely associated with candidate Obama who was acting on his behalf.”
The report goes further to indicate that not only were news reporters and talk show hosts pressured to withhold information under the threat of losing their jobs but that inherent in the threats was a subtle but distinct hint that any such dissemination of information could result in bodily harm or worse.
Fast-forward to January of 2011. A close friend of Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie, a veteran celebrity reporter by the name of Mike Evans, stated in a radio interview on January 19 that the Governor had initiated an extensive search of records that would prove Obama's eligibility, and that no such records could be found. But once the story of the allegations hit the news wires yesterday, Evans retracted everything he said by the end of the day on January 26.
Was Mike Evans threatened by someone either close to or within the Obama team?
There are no answers to that question at this time, but given the history of this issue, such a thing would fit a pattern established by those who were schooled in what is known as 'the Chicago way.'
Be sure to catch my blog at The Liberty Sphere.
Subscribe by clicking the subscribe box beside my picture at the top of the page, or below, and an email will be sent to your inbox each time a new article is published.
Comments
Of course, the White House does not want any of these issues addressed. If there were nothing wrong, we would have seen a copy of his birth certificate. He will use more thuggery to force people to keep quiet.
It is easy to prove Stanley Anne Dunham wasn't Obama's mother. She was born in Kansas November 29, 1942. With the Kansas school enrollment December cutoff date she is high school class of 1961 graduating in June 1961. Obama was born August 4, 1961 it is claimed.
What they're NOT telling you about the dire consequences ?
The bailouts, takeovers, stimulus, obamacare and obama's Supreme Court nominations all become null and void, AND last but not least; obama goes to prison.
well he is from 2 of the most corrupt citys in the US
Wow! Watch your back!
Obama will use "thuggery" to make reporters avoid the topic. If he had nothing to hide, we would have seen the real birth certificate. Then maybe the grades and other data he has concealed.
Haven't heard from you in a while, Ulsterman. Welcome back!
If this is true, that he is not eligible to be president, then all the supporters and the ones who denied access and helped cover, should be prosecuted for treason and go for the maximum penalty for it.
If he IS eligible, then it needs to be dropped with no consequence, because there is a right to know who your president is, they created the controversey when they refused to provide proof other than something that can be forged easily. The mexicans get fake IDs all the time, why not a corporate interest?
When known liars say, "trust me, its there, ive seen it", you need to ask, if you saw it, then why cant we? Why the obscurity? So much for transparency that he preached but never materialized.
Look at Egypt and many other countries. Its coming people, get ready! "It cant happen here" are famous last words for idiots.
name one president's birth certificate that YOU have seen...then show me.
The birth certificate issue is an ongoing distraction from the indisputable fact of Obama Sr.'s citizenship, and how it prevents Barack Hussein Obama from being a Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America. Angels from upon high could deliver a birth certificate acknowledging Hawaii as his birthplace, but nothing can change the facts of his father's citizenship.
Walrus, we havent had the issue before have we. I also did not pick a side in this. I do have a right to question why it has become an issue, and the fact that they are playing hide and seek does not help their credibility with it.
I keep noticing that everything that questions what the government is doing, goes against your grain, you either worship the government, or you are part of it. It is unamerican not to question what you have been told, especially from known liars.
Please keep your stupidity to yourself, your treason is showing.
You act like no one has the right to question, you are an apologist for the establishment, its protector, its idiot savant.
RSBL I agree with your comments 100%
How often does a dual-citizen enter the presidential election?
Well, now we can say it has happened twice in our short 234 years as a nation.
It happens so rarely that our system of checks and balances misses the technicality.
Several states (10 to date) have initiated or passed resolutions and amendments that will require a candidate for pres. and in some cases any federal office, that they produce irrefutable proof of citizenship and birth records, that must meet the Constitutional test for eligibility.
The Obama crew is not very thrilled with this speed bump, you can bet Holder will be pulling an Arizona on all of them and dragging them into court, Arizona is about to pass theirs so we will be feeling the heat soon.
And all those states are about to discover there is NO "Constitutional test for eligibility" because "natural born" has never been defined by law, Constitutional amendment or federal court ruling.
I especially love the language in Texas, where the birth certificate must indicate if someone is 'natural born" -- meaning we could not have another Texas-born president for at least 35 years... since existing birth certificates have no such block or category.
1. US Natural Born Citizens are children:
a. conceived of two lawfully married parents, and
i. the parents were legally married at the date and time of birth, and
ii. the child was born in the United States, and
b. the child is a legitimate child, not produced by
i. artificial insemination, or
ii. test-tube, or
iii. Petri dish, or
iv. in vitro fertilization, or
v. surrogate mother, or
vi. genetic-splicing, and
c. the child is not
i. a stepchild or
ii. adopted, and
d. the child is a direct-blood descendant of two US citizens who at the date and time of the child’s birth were:
i. two US Citizens (per the Fourteenth Amendment), or
ii. two US Natural Born Citizens (described above), or
iii. a US Citizen (per the Fourteenth Amendment), married to a US Natural Born Citizen.
Published at: http://www.scribd.com/silverbull8
to date - none have passed. AZ governor just vetoed it.
Well, that about says it. He's not eligible. But there's *another* reason to say that he's not eligible, beyond the venue of his birth.
Terry, up to today, you hadn't said one intelligent thing...your record remains intact..
Hello Terry,
Very eloquent, non threatening and succinct. Facts are facts. bho is proving your assertion regularly. You are to be commended for speaking your mind. I feel you should be able to do so without being attacked personally. That too is so typical of the "tolerant" ideology.
Wow talk about making a horse's @ss out of yourself. There goes "walrus" the thing with the spelling skills of a 5th grader insulting someone's intelligence. bwah hahahahahahaha. Dude if you weren't so pathetically ignorant you would be funny.
Can someone tell me why Obama had had to hide everything from his past? There has to be something that will at least, cause great embarrassment to him.
Whose job was it to vet him? Pelosi?
Yes, it was Pelosi. Imagine that.
Pelosi knows he is not a natural born citizen. She has committed fraud by submitting two difference forms to the different state elections boards certifying he is eligible to be on the ballot. The one she signed and sent to Hawaii is different than the ones to all the other states. That is a fact....It's on record. The NBC clause is left off the Hawaii form. Why else would she deliberiately submit two different forms?
A minister, by the name of Perry Stone, stated late last year, Obama will be found out this year. I trust not only will something be found out but something is done. If he's found to not be legit, all his signings will be in vain. No national health care, all the excess spending, etc. can be handled in one swoop!
The tsunami's coming on this--ever see anyone try to stop a tsunami? The Obamatron's rather odd speech can be traced, at least in part, on this story. Excellent article btw .
The entire issue of eligibility is much larger than barry soetero. Obviously the puppet masters thought through the ramifications of eventual exposure. "Time" has been the largest commodity purchased by the fraudulent occupation of the Oval office. The liar-in-chief knows his days are numbered. The elites are nearly on track in destroying America to new debt based nation building in China.
The very threats if "eligibility issues" are questioned confirms the falsity of barry's installation. Consider the enormity of complicit CONgress (including Republicans), election committees, czars, media, DoJ, lawyers (Robert Baur, etc.) Supreme justices, etc.
How in the world could a second term be possible? He will not make it through this term, UNLESS, the scam is obfuscated by horrific diversions.
If citizens all over confront their representatives with letters and in person regarding the ineligible status of usurper-in-chief we can collect a list of many were threatened to not pursue the issue and compile facts upon facts with so many attempts to bribe, threaten, or intimidate.
It is way past time to use Alinsky style rules against the Alinsky-ites. Overwhelm them with truthful facts and bombardment of evidence from every concerned citizen of this dying Republic.
not only is it possible - it's very probably that Barry Soetoro will be re-elected. Trump is all mouth and at best a wishy washy RINO. He gave money to re-elect Harry Reid in Nevada. Romney is a corporate raider that squeezed money from companies than trashed them and their employees. Huckabee - just what we need a preacher for a president. Alan West won't run, Cain is a possibility. Palin is a loser. So, it's very possible for Barry to be re-elected.
If the MSM is actually "reporting" on this issue that is a big change.
So then, only "conditional" free speech is okay.
Both John McCain's and George W. Bush's birth certificates were shown to the public. Bush's birth certificate was part of his military records and was shown when CBS accused him of being AWOL, McCain's was shown because it was claimed he was not eligible for the presidency .
The Senate passed a resolution proclaiming John McCain was a Natural Born Citizen using a definition that should have disqualified Barak Obama, McCain is a Natural Born Citizen because he is the offspring of Citizen parents (plural) where as Obama is the son of a resident alien here on a student visa and under British law of the time, is a British subject, he also would be a Kenyan citizen by way of his father and under Indonesian law at the time he was adopted would be an Indonesian citizen as well.
For those of you keeping count with US citizenship from his mother that makes four countries Obama is potentially a citizen or subject of, I am pretty sure this convoluted citizenship quandary is exactly why the Framers wrote into the Constitution the Natural Born Citizen clause for solely the presidency, but hey that's just me...
Horse puckey.
I challenge you to post a link to G.W. Bush's birth certificate. It has NEVER been released as a public record.
As for McCain, he has derivative citizenship, born to a citizen parent who was outside the US. That's ONE parent - that's all you need. Thousands of children of military parents married to foreigners and born overseas have exactly the same citizenship status as McCain.
And the 'sense of the Senate" resolution has no legal bearing; it's simply an opinion. I think it's the correct opinion - but NO court has ever even considered whether or not "derivative citizenship" - which is a form of automatic naturalization - meets the requirements of "natural born."
For that matter, no court has even taken up what "natural born" actually means. It's not defined in the Constitution and there are no writings by the Framers actually explaining the intent.
(Those who claim otherwise - let's see the quotes!)
If Obama was a natural born citizen of the U.S.A., there would be NO speculation. NO so-called "birthers." He spent a lot of money to conceal all records from his past. He HAS something to hide, or he would not have done that. HE WORKS FOR US, and we have a right to know that he was born in the U.S.A. I'm not afraid of him and/or his minions. He is OUR employee--not God. What damn nerve these people have!
Other than the thoroughly debunked World Net Daily claim, what evidence do you have he spent ANYTHING to "conceal all records from his past"?
In fact, many of those records are easily found with a simple online search.
Other than the thoroughly debunked World Net Daily claim, what evidence do you have he spent ANYTHING to "conceal all records from his past"?
In fact, many of those records are easily found with a simple online search.
Sounds like a dictator from history I wont mention his name but I think you will all know who Im talking about what ever happened to freedom of speech? its only free now if you approve of the administration...God Pleasssse Make him a 1 term pres
God has arranged for WE THE PEOPLE to have that authority. We get what we deserve when we vote.
If you don't want Obamao reelected, start talking to everyone you know and convince them to vote against him in the next election.
It's up to WE THE PEOPLE not God whether Obamao is reelected.
When Barack Obama, Jr. was six, his mother married an Indonesian oil manager, a
“ Muslim” named Lolo Soetoro, and the family moved to Jakarta, Indonesia, where the boy's half-sister Maya was born. The family would reside there for four years. Obama attended school in Indonesia under the name Barry Soetoro; at that time, only Indonesian citizens were permitted to attend school in that country.
Now being The Adopted by His new Father Lolo Soetoro Obamas name was now Barry Soetoro / note: look up Soebarkah Soetoro.
Now Also!"ineligible" to be POTUS under the Constitution.Because he was adopted,!!
His US Citizenship was given up in Indonesia Via/ Adopted by His new Father Lolo Soetoro .
Obamas name was now Barry Soetoro..and there is no evidence he ever reapplied For US Citizenship!.
SO HERE WE ARE!
Care to cite the provision of US law that states a minor loses his US citizenship simply by being adopted by a foreigner?
You cannot - it doesn't exist. You cannot take away US citizenship from a minor; they have to renounce it as an adult.
That's what that whole illegal immigrant anchor baby argument is about.
So, what was his birth name? If he was adopted into the Soetoro family, then his birth name is neither Soetoro nor Obama.
The birth certificate issue is an ongoing distraction from the indisputable fact of Obama Sr.'s citizenship, and how it prevents Barack Hussein Obama from being a Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America. Angels from upon high could deliver a birth certificate acknowledging Hawaii as his birthplace, but nothing can change the facts of his father's citizenship.
And no law or court ruling makes the citizenship of his father relevant. Under the 14th Amendment, if he was born in the US, he's a citizen.
And if he was born to a US citizen, even outside the US, he is a citizen through what at the time was called derivative citizenship (now called citizenship through descent since the law change in 2000).
Yawn like to mix terms. Citizen and Natural Born Citizen are distinctly different terms. The Founding Fathers were all citizens when the Constitution was ratified but they were not Natural Born so they had to grandfather themselves.
Presuming that Obama, Jr. was born in Hawaii, he is a U.S. citizen per his mother's citizenship and being born on the soil. He is NOT, however, a Natural Born Citizen as you indicate because he was both a British subject at birth and he was the son of a Kenyan National/British subject who was NOT a U.S. citizen. He is not, therefore, Natural Born.
I find it interesting that Abercrombie knew Obama as Barry. That would indicate that he returned to Hawaii on his Indonesian passport which lends credence to the report that he filed for foriegn student aid which could only have happened under foreign credentials. That would also indicate that he carried his Indonesian citizenship into adulthood which indicates that he did, indeed, abrogate his U.S. citizenship. Interesting, no?
The powers that be among the leviathans will not stop until anyone who lives here--legal or not--is allowed to be President. It's all part of the grand plan.
People whether they have opinions on his birthplace or not, need to ask themselves one simple question. What kind of person sitting in such a high office toys with the American people this way? What kind of people in other offices, Military, Supreme Court, and Congress allow that person to do it? The fact is, he is in a position of power and trust. I don’t think it’s asking a hell of a lot for him to release records so people can know his true background. For this reason alone, he isn’t fit to be where he is. He never deserved the title of President of the United States. He was elected for one reason only. It’s his complexion. He isn’t brilliant, he was the least qualified, and he’s as detestable a human being as they come.
I agree. In the future it would be wise if we require transparency of all elected officials records.
Anonymous , You are so right . You are 100% on the neil head. But what would give your words more power is to have a name other then Anonymous. Try using a real name.
Amen. Well said.
This will only continue to hurt obama as 2012 draws closer.
People want definitive answers to all the questions raised herein, over and above the "yes he is vs no he isn't" citizenship arguments of the left and right.
Posted by Yawn "In fact, many of those records are easily found with a simple online search."
Ok genius, show us the links!
Pages
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!