January 28, 2010 - The government provides a federally-funded program wherein family day care homes can receive meal reimbursements for serving nutritious meals and snacks to children, but many kids are missing out because providers complain benefits are low and paperwork is complex, says Linda Stone, Senior Food Policy Coordinator with Children’s Alliance.
As a result, Stone said Washington has seen a huge decline in the number of child care homes participating in the food program.
“ We are losing a great opportunity to improve the nutrition of children in child care by making this program too complex for family child care providers to use,” she said, “ Without the program, child care providers have no guidance on nutrition and miss out on up to $5 per day to help children meet their nutritional needs.”
The Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) is available to all licensed in-home day cares. The program promotes healthy eating and improves quality of care, making it more affordable for low-income families.
While reimbursement rates are low, it is possible to feed children healthy, nutritious, good-tasting meals with the money provided by the federal government. The Catholic Family & Child Service Child Care Nutrition Program and ESD 112 Food Program, for example, provide ample training and support to licensed in-home day care providers.
Creating healthy menus for children combined with smart shopping make it possible to feed children the healthy, nutritious foods their bodies need. It is well worth shopping at stores like Walmart that carry quality foods at a more reasonable price.
For example, a dozen eggs can be purchased for about $1.50 and can feed six children two meals. The cost of feeding each child one scrambled egg is 12 cents per child.
A loaf of whole wheat bread can be purchased for about $1.25. One loaf of bread provides about 15 servings and can easily feed six children two meals. The cost per serving of bread would be less than 10 cents.
A gallon of whole milk can be purchased for about $2. Each gallon of milk provides 16 cups. Children must be given two servings of milk each day. The cost per serving of milk would be about 16 cents.
Each serving of fruits and vegetables averages 50 cents.
So for about 90 cents, less than what the federal government reimburses per meal, children can eat very nutritious and well-balanced meals (these averages are based on feeding young children ages 1 to 5, and would increase slightly for older children).
While child care providers complain compensation is low, the bigger problem is the complex paperwork, inconvenient in-home visits, mandatory annual trainings, and time necessary to input children’s meals into a computer program.
However, it is worth the time and trouble to ensure children are eating healthy foods their growing and developing bodies so desperately need.
Many families are struggling to make ends meet. Worrying about purchasing and packing meals and snacks for their children during the workweek is difficult, at best.
Providers who participate in the food program and feed children healthy meals and snacks are providing not only a great service to children, but to their parents as well.
Sources:
Children's Alliance
CACFP Program
Catholic Families Nutrition Program
ESD 112 Food Program














Comments
From my experience in the child care field, I believe that another reason that is prompting many licensed family home child care providers to opt out of the Child Care Food Program is to avoid the quarterly monitoring by the food program staff. Some in home child care providers wish to avoid having outside eyes on their business practices. Food monitors may come announced to the child care, and observe issues of licensing safety concern, such as having more children in the child care than is allowed by their license.
I do not necessarily agree with Kathy. Maybe she has personal experience that we do not know about. I know for our business we do just fine providing healthy meals for kids and do not need the states help. On another note when you are busy with 8 to 12 children who has time to keep track of what each has eaten. The state program requires so much extra time that it is easily not worth the pathetically meager coins they give back to you. And frankly their idea of healthy isn't necessarily all that healthy.
And before I forget. Who loses? By not being part of the state program the kids are actually better off because we have more time to spend with them when they need it most.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!