Skip to main content
  1. News
  2. Politics
  3. Republican

Washington Post questions Phil Robertson's Masters degree in Education

See also

The snarky tone within the recently written Washington Post article by Valerie Strauss, was hard to miss, and from the very first poorly structured sentence, which included the following words:

"Phil Robertson, now famously suspended from his family’s popular cable reality television show for making shockingly offensive remarks about blacks and gays in a GQ interview, once taught in Louisiana schools, has a bachelor’s degree in physical education and a masters degree in education, with an English concentration. He even “kinda liked” Shakespeare. That, at least, is what he has said in interviews and on the Duck Commander Web site."

Shockingly offensive, but to whom? Not to mention the questioning tone at the end, which seems to raise doubt as to Robertson's integrity:

"That, at least, is what he said…"

Point in fact, a majority of male Americans would tend to agree with Robertson's assertions that a woman's equipage is far superior to a man's, with regard to coital penetration.

Hint: Form-fitting, custom designed, with even a built-in wet sump!

But the writer went on to questioning Robertson's sagacity, as if it were virtually impossible for a backwoods, Christian, red-neck, Hick, like many of us, at least for her purposes, to somehow obtain a Masters degree in education:

He didn’t say exactly when he taught or what he taught, but he has made repeated references in interviews to teaching and his degrees in interviews.

So, what we are in essence seeing, is an elitist Washington Post Liberal making gross, if not broad-brushed assumptions, based on her apparent dysfunction of debasing anyone living in rural America, who also just-so-happens to espouse Christian virtue.

Strauss, by the way, who is an education writer, continually lambasted Mitt Romney on his education stance during the 2012 campaign, obviously in favor of Obama and his common core agenda.

Strauss finishes her column stating this:

"And now he also has a suspension from the A&E network for his outrageous and uninformed remarks, which incidentally, would have caused him huge problems if he were still a teacher."

Uninformed according to whom? Or should we infer that Strauss now fancies herself a theological expert?

However, to get straight to the point, we wonder which statement might be more believable, to most Americans, at this point?

This one from Robertson?

"If you like your duck call you can keep it."

Or this one from the President of the US?

"If you like your health plan, you can keep it."

Hmm?

Advertisement

News

  • Obama's Asia trip
    President Obama arrives in Asia, though he's not necessarily getting a warm welcome
    Video
    Watch Video
  • Ferry survivors deal with guilt
    The few heroes of the Korean ferry disaster deal with unimaginable survivor's guilt
    World News
  • Biden in Ukraine
    Vice President Biden urges Moscow to avoid further unrest in Ukraine
    Politics
  • Pujols hits 500th home run
    Albert Pujols becomes the latest player to hit 500 home runs in his career
    Camera
    Sports
  • North Korean nuclear test?
    South Korea detects another possible nuclear test from North Korea
    Headlines
  • NYPD's Twitter campaign backfires
    NYPD's campaign designed to amicably engage New Yorkers and cops backfires horribly
    Video
    Watch Video

User login

Log in
Sign in with your email and password. Or reset your password.
Write for us
Interested in becoming an Examiner and sharing your experience and passion? We're always looking for quality writers. Find out more about Examiner.com and apply today!