Image Credit : Newhouse News Service
Now that the election is over the Deborah Howell, the Washington Post Ombudsman, admits that the Post's election coverage was biased toward Obama.
Howell reports readers complained consistently criticized the Post's "lack of probing issues coverage and what they saw as a tilt toward Democrat Barack Obama." She conducted a survey of the Post's election coverage since November 11, 2007 on issues, voters, fundraising, the candidates' backgrounds, horse-race stories on tactics, strategy and consultants, and photos and Page 1 stories since Obama captured the nomination June 4.
The survey, which conveniently ended on Election Day, found that the readers' criticisms are "right on both counts:"
[. . .]
Stories and photos about Obama in the news pages outnumbered those devoted to McCain. Post reporters, photographers and editors -- like most of the national news media -- found the candidacy of Obama, the first African American major-party nominee, more newsworthy and historic.
Howell also admits, now that it is too late to make a difference, that Obama and Biden should have been scrutinized more:
[. . .]
One gaping hole in coverage involved Joe Biden, Obama's running mate. When Gov. Sarah Palin was nominated for vice president, reporters were booking the next flight to Alaska. Some readers thought The Post went over Palin with a fine-tooth comb and neglected Biden. They are right; it was a serious omission.
It doesn't make me feel any better that the Post admits its election coverage was biased toward Obama. Like Bill Ayers, the Post remains unrepentant about the fact the coverage was biased. I'm sure we can look forward to a continued biased coverage of President-elect Obama.
Related Elections 2008 info: Elections 2008 political roadmap
Political issues in 2008
Poll: who will be the next U.S. president?
Examiner Coverage: Elections 2008
Comments
Your media coverage was reprehensible and unforgivable. You, and all other media that gave biased reports. It's beyond imagination the damage you could cause by this kind of reporting. You have built him up to a "messiah" like image. Not just to American, but to the world. If you turn on the news, around the world they think Obama is going to save them. Do you realize the position you have placed Obama, and therefore Americans, if he fails. The worlds expectations, thanks to your biased reporting, is astronomical. You owed it to us and to the world an objective report on all candidates. Lets hope this doesn't come back to bite you in the butt!
the Wash is runned by old hags like Deb Howell, is it any wonder Obama didn't get the respect like he should have as a Prezz elect.
With the pro-Obama bias we've seen from the MSM, talking about how "qualified" he is, what a great "leader" he is, and how he is the "Chosen one", the "Messiah", "The One", we should expect great things the moment he takes office. In fact, based on all of the accolades, we should not expect nor allow him ANY mistakes.
The mainstream media most certainly does NOT refer to Obama as the "chosen one, messiah and the one."
Go back to your cave.
And when are the other news media outlets going to admit their Obama bias too?
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!