The first presentation from the recently completed European Exopolitics Summit is now available for free online viewing. The one hour video presentation covers ten categories of evidence used in ‘exopolitics’, a new field that involves public policy analysis of evidence concerning extraterrestrial life and technology. Approximately 1400 people attended the two day Exopolitics Summit in Barcelona, Spain from July 25-26, 2009. The Summit featured pioneers in the rapidly growing exopolitics movement. Exopolitics organizations have emerged in all continents except Antarctica. Penguins appear to have much in common with skeptics of the exopolitics movement.
The literature on extraterrestrial life comes from a diverse number of sources that differ greatly in terms of their reliability, accuracy and persuasiveness. These evidentiary sources operate within the political context of official government policies that largely deny legitimacy of evidence concerning extraterrestrial life, and of a systematic cover-up of such evidence for national security reasons. The most immediate problem arises from a misunderstanding of the scientific method by those dismissing evidentiary sources that don’t meet unrealistically high verification standards. It is vital to understand ALL evidentiary sources supporting the existence of extraterrestrial life and of an associated global government cover-up that can be traced back to the USA.
In the video, evidence is categorized in order to determine sources that have most relevance for the objective critic in a pre-disclosure political environment. The presentation assigns a ranking for each category somewhere in the range: Strong-Moderate-Weak. These rankings are based on the strengths and weaknesses of each category identified in the presentation. The categories of evidence presented in the video are as follows:
| 1. official and leaked documents- Strong-Moderate | 6. remote viewing- Moderate |
| 2. whistleblower testimonies- Strong-Moderate | 7. crop circles - Moderate |
| 3. UFO witness reports - Strong- Moderate | 8. expert testimonies - Moderate; |
| 4. experiencer testimonies -Strong-Moderate | 9. space image analysis - Moderate - Weak |
| 5. exo-Archeology- Moderate | 10. telepathic communications - Weak |
If you wish to understand the main sources of evidence used in exopolitical analysis, this video is not to be missed. The full one hour video titled "Ranking Evidentiary Sources of Extraterrestrial Life and Technology" is available for free online viewing (click above graphic) or click here.
[Author Note: Thanks to Robert Fleischer from Exopolitics Germany for making available the above video and his live streaming of the Exopolitics European Summit.]
Comments
Fine job, Michael!
Thank you for your presentation and for releasing the video. I have followed all the summit on line and really appreciated it. You all did a great job! (thank you to Paola, too:))
Hi Paola, Im Mike from South Africa.I would like you to interview Credo Mutwa the Zulu Shaman who hha great knowledge about extratterestrials.
Dr. Salla shows his lack of sensibility, but not his brilliant intellect when compares the skeptics with the antarctic penguins.
Indeed penguins live in contact with REALITY while Exopoliticians hang out in a world of fiction and pseudo-science.
How about Ed Grimsley's sightings of ufos moving with obviously intelligent and deliberate control, and engaged in some sort of hostilities? Would that count as "space image analysis?" Personally I've never looked through night vision goggles, but people who have are convinced, including skeptics.
x.o.p! 2 evryone involved, much love and respect people. this area of interest is so much fun to study. as for the skeptics? nobody likes a know it all, get a clue; get a grip! the renaisance is here. onelove x
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!