In many of the Catholic and pro-life commentaries on the long career of Senator Kennedy, a certain 1971 letter to a constituent was mentioned. Here is the story of how I learned about Thomas Dennelly, the man whose correspondence elicited the now famous response.
One day, after my story "A Special Mother is Born" was published in Faith and Family magazine, I received an email from the wife to Thomas Dennelly's son, who blogs at Vive Christus Rex. It seems the gift of written expression runs in the Dennelly family. She wanted to know who I was, and told her that I was delighted to hear from her and tell what a noble family she had married into. I learned that Mr Dennelly was well known as a pro-life activist in speaker on Long Island in the 1970's, a time when as a teen, I was becoming aware of the tragedy of legal abortion, and beginning a pro-life club in my high school. We were traveling in the same circles but never met.
Recently, I heard this story which is in today's NCRegister blog. Thomas was not only politically saavy enough to elicit Kennedy's memorable response to his query about his stand on abortion, but he wisely kept his copy of the letter in which Kennedy's response is unequivocal in his condemnation of abortion as a moral evil;
"Wanted or unwanted, I believe that human life, even at its earliest stages, has certain rights which much be recognized--the right to be born, the right to love, the right to grow old,” ‘When history looks back to this era it should recognize this generation as one which cared about human beings enough to halt the practice of war, to provide a decent living for every family, and to fulfill its responsibility to its children from the very moment of conception.’"
Contrast this with a statement Kennedy made in a Senate floor speech in opposition to the ban on partial-birth abortion in 2003: "I do not believe it is the role of the Senate to interfere with or regulate the kind of medical advice that a doctor can give to a patient,”
That year Kennedy also voted for an amendment sponsored by Sen. Tom Harkin (D.-Iowa) that said the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade correctly and that abortion is a constitutional right. HT CNS
Here again, beautiful pro life words from the man whom NARAL and Planned Parenthood praised for his 100% pro-abortion voting record;
“On the question of the individual’s freedom of choice there are easily available birth control methods and information which women may employ to prevent or postpone pregnancy,” Kennedy wrote. “But once life has begun, no matter what stage of growth, it is my belief that termination should not be decided merely by desire.”
I admire the fact that Mr Dennelly was prudent enough to keep this important letter for future reference. When, riled by Kennedy's incoherent response to his letter protesting his vote against the Hyde Amendment in 1978 ( bans the use of federal funds for abortion), Dennelly released the 1971 letter to National Right to Life News, and the Catholic League. It was a powerful tool against Kennedy's rants against pro-life Catholic Supreme Court nominees Alito and Roberts in the Judiciary Committee. Kennedy's own words were a rebuke to what he had become and the job of criticizing the pro-life views of Catholics fell to others, who could be accused of anti-Catholic bigotry. Dennelly's letter revealed Kennedy's pro-life roots and vividly illustrated just how far away from the Culture of Life he had traveled. His departure from Catholic morality in his politics paralleled the moral depravity of Kennedy's other extra-curricular activities. Perhaps as he betrayed his Catholic upbringing, his hurting conscience led him to give up on living a good life. A good, honest confession could have stopped this downward trend. On "Meet the Press" Kathleen Kennedy Townsend said, "we are a Church of sinners" she went on to mouth politically correct mumbo-jumbo about overcoming your faults and moving forward, but never mentioned confession of your sins first. Perhaps the liberal clergy of the 70's are somewhat to blame, but the Kennedys were raised in the old Church and should have known better. Whatever the reasons, when Kennedy reformed his personal life after the Kennedy Smith rape trial, he forgot to redeem his politics. Tragic. A posthumous memoir to be published Sept 14 seems to confirm that Kennedy was guilt-ridden for 40 years over Chappaquiddick. Guilt does funny things to your conscience, often egging you on to worse feats as if you were saying "What difference does it make, I've done that?"
HT NY Times
Now I have read excerpts of the famous "1971 letter to a constituent" everywhere from the blogs, to the Wall Street Journal, to Jill Stanek's column. Dennelly's son refers to it in this post. He was three when it was sent. How the world has changed since then! How much political damage has been done to the Democratic Party by their marriage to the cause of abortion on demand? It has been said that if the Democratic Party had a pro-life platform, it wouldn't have lost an election since 1980. Dennelly himself attributes defection of many pro-life politicians, both Catholic and Protestant to Kennedy's poor example. "I think the implication is that Kennedy was the vanguard for tempting all these Catholics, particularly in the Democratic Party, but also some segments of the Republican Party, as well. And if Kennedy had not come out [pro-abortion] and had used his God-given talents and accepted the indisputable scientific truth that the child is scientifically a human from conception, I don’t think you would have had this avalanche of Roman Catholic elected officials following him."
Amen, Mr Dennelly, couldn't have said it better myself!













Comments
Well written and informative. So many people do not know this part of his past. So glad to have you aboard the Examiner!
I did not know about this letter, but I feel compelled to note that Kennedy's views on life issues, even in 1971, were straying from Catholicism. Invoking birth control shows that he was already wishy-washy, and it cannot be a surprise that he strayed even farther. The greatest weakness of the prolife movement is its unwillingness to admit that contraception and abortion are two branches of the same tree. If it's okay to monkey with your body to prevent conception and implantation (as hormonal birth control does), how can you deny the "right" to abortion? Abortion is just a few steps farther down the same road.
Kate
www.kathleenbasi.com
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!