Skip to main content
  1. News
  2. Politics
  3. Policy & Issues

The international community must prepare to introduce new sanctions against Iran


An Iranian Missile Test. SOURCE: US Government

The failure of the international community to resolve the Iranian nuclear stand-off, means that an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities is growing increasingly likely. If the European Union and the United States want to avoid this outcome, they will have to prepare to introduce new sanctions against the Iranian government in the near future.

International consensus now largely agrees that Iran’s nuclear program is not exclusively for peaceful purposes. Further, for Israel, President Ahmadinejad is not as many westerners perceive him; a ranting but ultimately rational actor. Instead, he is the ultimate anti-Semite; a man who, along with his clerical masters, is absolutely committed to the destruction of the Israeli state. This concern is indelibly hardened by the experiences of Auschwitz and Treblinka. As key expert on Israeli nuclear strategy, Shai Feldman, notes, for Israelis nuclear weapons in the hands of adversaries, ‘are viewed as potentially exposing Israel to a second holocaust, even complete extinction.’ Israel also fears that possessing a nuclear weapons capability, Iran would be able to encourage aggression against them through allies like the Lebanese Hizballah, without fear of massive retaliation, assuming that Israel would not want to risk a nuclear exchange.

History tells us that Israel will not accept an Iranian nuclear weapon.

At Osirak in 1981 and Syria in 2007, Israel showed its long standing determination to deny regional enemies possession of nuclear weapons. Israel knew that it would receive sharp international criticism for both these attacks and yet this risk, nor the risk of retaliation, was enough to deter Israeli military action. With Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, there is little reason to believe this dynamic has changed.

Time for a peaceful outcome is running out. Reports from Israel suggest that in the early summer, Netanyahu gave President Obama until the end of the year to produce results in US-EU negotiations with Iran. These reports suggest that failing progress in negotiations and an absence of new sanctions, Israel will in January 2010, begin to actively consider ‘other options’. Contrary to popular opinion, potential Israeli military options against Iran, though highly complex, are not implausible. Indeed, Israel has already conducted large scale training operations for such an attack. Critically important also, Sunni Arab fears over perceived expanding Iranian power in the Middle East, make Iran’s nuclear program a key concern across the region and not just for Israel. For example, it is not challenging to plausibly imagine a situation (that some accounts suggest has already been agreed), in which Saudi Arabia grants Israel over-flight permission to attack Iran.

Too many in the West are convinced that the practical difficulties inherent in a successful Israeli attack on Iran, correspondingly make such action implausible. These individuals thus conclude that negotiations with Iran need not be urgent. This error of judgment is potentially catastrophic. If negotiations fail and Israel is forced to resort to the use of force, the regional consequences in both human and political terms would be significant. Iran would likely retaliate against Israel either through missile strikes or through its non state allies. This would risk counter-retaliation from Israel and invite an escalatory dynamic that could feasibly engulf the entire region in war. The EU and the US must obviously do everything possible to avoid this outcome.

If Iran is continuing to ignore international inspection/verification demands by the end of December, Britain, France and Germany should join the United States in implementing new sanctions. These sanctions should focus on targeting Iranian import needs, specifically, in the field of refined petroleum imports. At the same time, the EU and US should continue to offer Iran the same nuclear deal as presented in Geneva in October. This deal, in which France and Russia would enrich Iran’s uranium and then transfer the produced fuel back to Iran for monitored use (in so assuring Iran’s nuclear program was peaceful), would give Iran a clear and positive alternative than sanctions. Such an option would also necessarily offer Iran a continuing mechanism for legitimate scientific and power related development, while also, presenting clearly (in the form of sanctions) the severe costs of non-compliance. Israeli fears would be allayed (at least to the degree to prevent military action) and the potential for war significantly diminished.

The Iranian nuclear stand off is approaching the end game. If a peaceful outcome is to triumph, the EU-US must be ready to act with determined courage and intelligence.

Comments

  • Leon Louis 4 years ago

    I don't get the argument that sanctions have to be placed on Iran in order to allay Israel's fear otherwise they will start a war. Isn't it the job of the world tell country not to commit aggression. How is it the responsibility of potential victim to stop doing something in order to avoid being a victim of aggression. Something is wrong with that logic no matter how much we hate Iran. How does this sound? China should put sanctions on Israel, in order to allay Iranian fears might have a stockpile of 200 or so nuclear weapon, thereby avoiding a situation where Iran might launch a war on Israel. If this sound funny, just imagine the indignation if you are an Iranian leader listen to those nonsense coming from the International Community. Isn't it the purpose of the Security council to prevent country from initiating wars against another country. Iran has not started a war for centuries, it is a shame that we are turning a blind eye to that history out of bias and racism.

  • Sam Morgan 4 years ago

    Sanctions are not going to work.

  • Gerald 4 years ago

    I agree with Leon. That's not a sound logic at all, but then the US government and Israel are not so much bound by logics of mutual respect. The logic that the US follows is along with its national interests no matter it agrees with international norms or not.
    This is, however, a serious issue because what the US does is in contrast to maintaining international order collectively. So, we would have no order at all or the US shall bring the order in place since she does not want that done collectively. But that is too costly on the US and the country had not shown to have succeeded in recent years -- Iraq, Afghanistan. Therefore, I believe the international community shall tell the US about its wrong policies and ask for Iran's participation in maintaining the security in the Middle East collectively.

  • Esther Haman 4 years ago

    Mr.Thomas Rogan, I am not sure you know what you are talking about and what really is involved here. Accusing Mr. Ahmadinejad to be an anti-Semite is totally false. The Palestinians are also Semitic people and your brother. They are from Abraham's second wife and you are descendant and from his first wife! Mr. Ahmadinejad along with his clerical masters, ARE NOT committed to the destruction of the Israeli state and that is a fiction and propaganda generated by the Zionists to peg Iran to the two nation peace purposal by our president B. Obama and to derail it.
    The Iranians had nothing to do with what happened to the Jews in Europe and neither did the Palestinians. SO what you people go bark at the Germans, Poland, French, Russians and the rest of them in Europe?! Go get your land back from them, why the Palestinians have to pay for your suffering?! Don't try to tie the Iranians and this issue to that it will not wash.

  • Esther Haman 4 years ago

    History tells us that Israel will accept an Iranian nuclear weapon. Since Iran and the rest of the Middle East has to accept 200+ of the A-bombs you guys already have.
    time for a peaceful outcome ran out when you stuck pilled these nuclear weapons and keep building in the occupied territories. It ran out after 1967.
    Israel will not have any ‘other options’, or it will be raining Sajil missile down town Telaviv.
    Saudi Arabia has no control over her air space to grant flight permission to Israel to attack Iran. We control them as well the Israelis and they got their orders from GWB before he left office.
    Iran has been under IAEA and UN inspection for 10 years and no smoking gun has ever been found and they have abided by all the NPT regulations. Unlike the Zionist state who is the only rouge nation with undeclared nuclear weapons.
    So, go relax and have a beagle.

  • Gerald 4 years ago

    I agree with Leon. That's not a sound logic at all, but then the US government and Israel are not so much bound by logics of mutual respect. The logic that the US follows is along with its national interests no matter it agrees with international norms or not.
    This is, however, a serious issue because what the US does is in contrast to maintaining international order collectively. So, we would have no order at all or the US shall bring the order in place since she does not want that done collectively. But that is too costly on the US and the country had not shown to have succeeded in recent years -- Iraq, Afghanistan. Therefore, I believe the international community shall tell the US about its wrong policies and ask for Iran's participation in maintaining the security in the Middle East collectively.

Advertisement

News

  • Sterling loses Clippers
    Donald Sterling loses big in court with no option for an appeal
    Video
    Video
  • Russia violating arms treaty?
    Russia is testing a long-range missile which violates an INF arms treaty
    World News
  • Ebola outbreak
    The Ebola epidemic in West Africa has proven to be quite difficult to contain
    Health News
  • Virginia same-sex marriage
    The ban on same-sex marriage is ruled unconstitutional in Virginia
    US News
  • Abigail Hernandez suspect
    A suspect is in police custody for the disappearance of Abigail Hernandez
    Crime
  • Bachelorette finale
    'The Bachelorette' is in the books, which lucky guy got Andi's final rose?
    TV