We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 71°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

'The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard' draws criticism from Asian Americans


  Dr. Ken in "The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard"

A recent blog post on the Angry Asian Man website entitled "hate crimes for fun and laughs in 'The Goods'" got me thinking about the ubiquitous doctor turned comedian turned actor Ken Jeong.

In one of my previous columns, I asked readers: "Is Ken Jeong's character Mr. Chow in 'The Hangover' a racist stereotype?"

Most of the Asians and Asian Americans that left comments on that article seemed to think his Mr. Chow character was in "bad taste" with some readers declaring him a "Hollywood whore" or "sellout."

Granted "The Hangover" is yet another in a recent slew of gross-out movies where everyone is being ridiculed, not just Asians.  Nevertheless, the trend towards tasteless humor in Hollywood is appalling.

And it seems filmmakers are pushing the limits with each new movie.

So what has Dr. Ken done to followup his over-the-top Mr. Chow caricature in "The Hangover?"

Well, he's playing a car salesman named Teddy Dang in the low-brow comedy "The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard" starring Jeremy Piven.

In "The Goods" Redband trailer, we see Dr. Ken as Teddy getting stomped on by a group of angry co-workers after Piven's character incites violence by giving a supposed pep talk to his sales team.

For some unexplained reason in the trailer, Piven compares car sales with going to war and spouts off: "Don't even get me started about Pearl Harbor... We are are the Americans, and they are the enemy. Never again!"

As Piven gives his speech, we see Dr. Ken's character nervously eyeing the older white male co-worker next to him seething with rage.

When Piven finishes his speech, the old white guy yells, "Let's get 'em!" and knocks Dr. Ken's character to the ground.  Next thing we see is the entire staff stomping on the Asian man.

 

Angry Asian Man points out the joke is probably that the old racist white guy is "taking out unfinished wartime aggression on the first Oriental guy in sight, and that we're supposed to laugh at the fact that everybody gets caught up in the racist wartime hysteria."

But something just doesn't feel right about laughing at this whole joke.  To make matters worse, Piven's character later tells the group they've just "participated in a hate crime."

Are they serious?  We're supposed to think that its funny to laugh at hate crimes?

Would the filmmakers think it's funny if the Dr. Ken character was an Arab man who was beaten because they all thought he was responsible for the 9/11 planes crashing into the twin towers?

If Piven's speech had been written as a rally cry against Muslim fundamentalist terrorists, would that be funny, too?

Historically speaking, this kind of insensitive humor reeks of bad taste when looked at in context of the Vincent Chin murder by a unemployed white autoworker in 1982.

While attending his bachelor party at a suburban Detroit club, Chin and Ronald Ebens, a white autoworker, traded insults across the bar. "It's because of you little motherf.... that we're out of work," witnesses later remembered Ebens yelling at Chin.

An irate Chin then started a fight with Ebens.  But Ebens' stepson, Michael Nitz, who had also been laid off from his autoplant job, jumped into the fray.  The fight was reportedly broken up by a parking attendant with Chin and his friends leaving the bar and going their separate ways. 

However, about twenty minutes later, Ebens and Nitz caught up with Chin in front of a fast-food restaurant where Ebens grabbed a baseball bat and smashed Chin's leg.  Nitz then held the wounded Chin, while Ebens bashed Chin's skull in with the bat.

Before Chin slipped into a coma, he reportedly murmured to a friend, "It's not fair."  Just four days later -- and five days before his wedding -- Chin died from the injuries he sustained during the beating.

The incident was later documented in the 1987 film "Who killed Vincent Chin?"  The documentary was directed by Christine Choy and Renee Tajima-Peña.  It was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature.

Vincent Chin became a metaphor for anti-Asian sentiment in America.  It has been said that not only was it ignorant for Ebens and Nitz to presume Chin, a 27-year-old Chinese American, was Japanese, but the attack was also motivated by economical status, as the two autoworkers blamed the Japanese  for the failing U.S. auto industry and the loss of their jobs at the time.

It has also been pointed out that what was even more horrible about the Vincent Chin incident is "the use of a baseball bat as a murder weapon" which as everyone knows baseball is America's pastime.

As for Chin's murderers, Ebens was arrested and taken into custody at the scene by two off-duty police officers who witnessed the beating.  Ebens and Nitz were later convicted in a county court for manslaughter by Wayne County Circuit Judge Charles Kaufman, after a plea bargain brought the charges down from second-degree murder.

Both men served no jail time, were given three years probation, fined $3,000 and were ordered to pay $780 in court costs.  In a response letter to protests from American Citizens for Justice, Kaufman said, "These weren't the kind of men you send to jail... You don't make the punishment fit the crime; you make the punishment fit the criminal."

In light of the Vincent Chin incident, "The Goods" attempt at making hate crimes funny is rather disturbing and has already drawn criticism from the Media Action Network for Asian Americans (MANAA), who recently contacted Paramount in response to the movie.

A MANAA spokesman stated that as of yesterday Paramount had not responded to their requests to review the scene within the context of the whole movie.

I also read a post on Nikkei View: The Asian American Blog where someone has coined a new term for the form of racial-based comedy we've been seeing in movies like "The Goods" and "The Hangover."  It's being called "hipster racism."

According to the post on Nikkei View, the term "hipster racism" is defined as "indulging in racist stereotypes, but then covering your a.. with the alibi that you are just being satirical or ironic."

For more details on "Hipster Racism" go to:  http://meloukhia.net/2009/07/hipster_racism.html

Ironically, Dr. Ken once again sold himself out to promote "The Goods" on television recently, along with indulging in this new "hipster racism" style of comedy.  He also seems intent on establishing himself as the "Mantan Moreland" or "Stepin Fetchit" of Asian American actors.

If you don't believe me, just watch this recent clip of Dr. Ken dressed up as a pimp along with Piven on World Wrestling Entertainment's nationally televised show "WWE Raw" in which the good doctor gets tossed out of the ring.

I sure hope Dr. Ken has a good chiropractor!

Advertisement

, LA Asian American Movie Examiner

Ed Moy is an award-winning Asian American writer, actor, producer. He has written for Asian Week News, Asiance Magazine and 13 Minutes Magazine. He's a member of the Coalition for Asian Pacifics in Entertainment.

Comments

  • jesse 2 years ago

    I heard about that scene from several young people, none of them Asian, but all of them found it hysterical. I mostly rolled my eyes at it, since I failed to see the humor in it and was mostly puzzled as to why they thought it was funny. I didn't think it was offensive at the time, but I did think it felt like it was a dated joke. it seemed like soomething perhaps my father or someone who knew about the closing of American facories would have found funny, sadly enough. But I see now that yeah! That is offensive and has no excuse! What the hell Hollywood! The definition of "Hipster racism" sounds pretty damn accurate & now I know why I never found that sort of humor funny at all. Young brother & friends claimed I'm getting too old to see the humor (I'm 26!) but its not so much a matter of age as it is one of ignorance. Seems schools are getting lax in teaching about racism, becuz its amazing how many young folks claim racism is over. Appalling, really, in light of this movie trend.

  • Ming 2 years ago

    Please do not take my post as an attempt to excuse lazy writing.

    No matter what part of the world you're in - the Other - is a popular punching bag, especially if the Other seems to be doing better money-wise or even happiness-wise than the targeted audience

    East Asians or Orientals are seen as either equals or doing better than the average Joe. I bet hearing Jon Stewart crack jokes about the US government borrowing from the Chinese to send aid to Afghanistan ruffled some feathers.

    Americans also like to use Canadians as a punching bag, maybe cause the rest of the world likes Canada better than the USA.

    Apparently, Bollywood liked to cast the Chinese as villains as well. I think this is changing though since Bollywood wants to get into the Chinese movie market.

    Westerners are a popular choice for punching bags in East Asian media. Google "racism in Japan" to see Westerners whine about not being wanted & being blamed as a group for rising crime in Japan.

  • Jerome 2 years ago

    Ken Jeong is a pop culture whore who's so caught up with his rise to fame that he will do anything and say anything even if it results in the negative proliferation of Hollywood's stereotypical Asian male.

  • Ray 2 years ago

    Ken Jeong was good in "Knocked Up", but in "Hang Over", "The Goods..." and soon coming TV series "Community" are all terrible!
    Wrong approach to the characters, non believable, bad taste, it's embarrassing! such a joker! May be the White people like it, therefore he does the way the White people like, or White people like it so they keep using him to play that way. I guess we have to cater to the white folks who are the majority (80%) of the population in America, poor Ken, sacrifice so much to please others!

  • Chi 2 years ago

    @Ming:

    Everything you say may be true. But that still doesn't make it right.

  • Nien 2 years ago

    Thanks for the article. I think we’ve reach a point in time where it is appropriate to ask that Asian American actors/actresses take non-stereotypical roles. Yes, roles for AMs are hard to come by in Hollywood, but Ken Jeong's character in Hangover was a monumental step back with regards to AM portrayal in popular media. Clearly, AMs are making inroads (however slowly) into roles free of damaging stereotypes (think John Cho, Sandra Oh), so for Ken to take such a role is really a slap in the face. Money isn't even an excuse for him, considering he's got the two letters MD after his name.

  • Nien 2 years ago

    (continued from previous post)

    Jeung has enthusiasm and energy for the acting biz, but I hope he will take lessons from some of the best Asian-born actors such as Tony Leung and Takeshi Kaneshiro who have turned down Hollywood roles because they refuse to play parts that portray Asians in a stereotypical light. Here’s to hoping that as a public figure and a member of the minority in America, Ken realizes he has a responsibility greater than his own indulgence when it comes to portraying characters on the screen.

  • JS 2 years ago

    Been really curious to read Ed's earlier column, "Is Ken Jeong's character Mr. Chow in 'The Hangover' a racist stereotype?" but I get a 404 Error. Is it expired or something? Wish it would get fixed.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...