We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 72°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

The Counter-Reformation, follow-up to the Sardis period of church history

“The accusations and criticisms that the Reformers of the Protestant Reformation raised against the Roman Catholic Church, while initially ignored by that church’s hierarchy,” explained the Reverend J.A. Layman, evangelist with Sterling Ministries, before The Lay School faculty here in Clinton, Tennessee, “were proven to be legitimate by the Roman Church which underwent its own reformation or revival beginning approximately the time of the Council of Trent convened from 1545-1563, and lasting until approximately 1648 at the end of the Thirty Years’ War. At the heart of this reformation were issues of corruption amongst the bishops and priests, the practice of the sale of indulgences so vehemently opposed by Martin Luther, and other abuses of a financial nature. The fact that many of the issues raised by the Protestant Reformers required the Roman Church to convene a council to deal with the allegations provides some verification of the problems, however, the end result was that the Roman church reaffirmed a great deal of the beliefs, doctrines, and practices that elicited the ire of the Protestant Reformers in the first place. Notwithstanding, certain noticeable changes within Roman Catholicism emerged from the Counter-Reformation which tacitly admitted that, at least, some of the criticisms of the Protestant Reformers were legitimate."

It cannot be overemphasized that any focus on the allegations of the Protestant Reformers against the Roman Catholic Church of the Middle Ages was or is an attempt to single out the Roman Catholic Church for promulgating faith and practices that were contrary to the Word of God. Roman Catholicism was not the first or only group of believers whose faith and practice deviated from that which is delineated in God’s Word. The messages of the Old Testament prophets clearly and unmistakably catalogue many of the failures of the Israelites to remain faithful to God, His Word, and the covenant they had accepted and agreed to at the foot of Mount Sinai. Further, a good case can be constructed against the forms of eccesliastical-ism that the Protestant Reformers created when they left the Roman Catholic Church. Truly, regardless of what branch or denomination of Christianity, or for that matter, sect of Judaism, one comes from, all have a great deal to answer for before Almighty God concerning the way that we do church and synagogue.

Advertisement

, Knoxville Evangelical Examiner

Dan received his BA in religion and education at Carson-Newman College in Jefferson City, Tennessee. With more than 40 years of both personal and academic study in the Bible and related fields, Dan is uniquely qualified to provide intellectually challenging insight into all topics concerning...

Comments

  • Dark Knight 1 year ago

    The sale of indulgences is biblical.
    Sirach 3:30 - "Water will quench a flaming fire; and alms maketh an atonement for sins."
    Second Maccabees 12:39-46.

  • Daniel Hopkinson 1 year ago

    First, you cite ONE verse from the Deutero-canonical books which Protestants, Baptists, and Jews unilaterally deny as being canonical works. The law itself states that all testimony is to be accepted on the basis of the testimony of 2 or 3 witnesses not one.

    Second, and much more important, you ignore the several other verses of the parts of the Bible which all Christianity accepts as canonical that specifically state the ONLY way that sins can be atoned is through the blood of Jesus Christ, not by ANYTHING that a sinner can DO.

  • D.K. 1 year ago

    The Apostles of Jesus Christ considered the books of Sirach and Second Maccabees to be canon. Do you consider the Talmud to be canon too?
    Revelation 1:4 and 8:3-4 reference Tobit 12:15. Hebrews 11:35 references Second Maccabees.

  • Daniel Hopkinson 1 year ago

    Upon what documentable evidence do you assert that the "Apostles of Jesus Christ considered the books of Sirach and Second Maccabees to be canon"; based on the references you provide? Really! However, thank you for yet another topic for an article, hopefully to be completed and posted this week.

    FYI- no, I do not consider the Talmud to be canonical! Have you ever read it; ALL OF IT? How could such pettiness as is found in some passages of the Palestinian Talmud (which appears to be the more extensive of the Babylonian and Palestinian Talmuds) be considered by any Christian as the equivalent of canonical Scripture?

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...