Being the studious type that many evolutionists are, I reckon it is time for the evolutionist camp to go back to school to learn some basics, the ABCs.
Let me see if I can help out.
A - absurd, amusing, asinine. That theory of evolution that is trying to be passed off is pretty amusing if you think about it, absurd at best and down right asinine if you think about it too hard.
B - bull hockey, baloney, B.S. Baloney, I say. You expect me to believe that bull hockey. Evolution theory is nothing but B.S. from the getgo.
C - Cinderella, cute - Evolution reminds us of Cinderella - pumpkin seed (don't know where it's from) becomes pumpkin (don't know how that happened) then the pumpkin became a carriage (sans the fairy godmother, of course.)
D - dream - Should be called the evolutionary dream, befitting of dreamers and other pie-in-the-sky wishers of things not true.
E - enough, eh? - Eh? You want to believe it all came about how? Yeah, right. Enough already. My belly hurts from laughing so much.
F - fogiddaboutit - Nope, not buying it. Evolutionists don't have a leg to stand on. Fogiddaboutit.
G - Gee whiz - Gee whiz. The imagination the evolutionary folk is indeed remarkable.
H - Hahaha, hogwash - Ha ha ha ha ha ha. How can the evolutionists be serious?
I - idiocy - I wonder do the evolutionists really take this idiocy seriously?
J - joking, jesting - You've got to be joking. Evolutionists want us to believe what?
K - kidding - Oh, I get it now...you were kidding about the monkeys became man thing, right?
L - laughable, lunacy, ludicrous - Did you hear the one about the monkey writing a sonata?
M - My, my, my, madness, mumbo jumb - My, my, my, didn't your mother teach you not to tell lies?
N - nonsense, nitwittedness - Nonsense of the highest order.
O - Oh, no, open sesame. - Oh, no. You have got to be kidding.
P - philosophy, preposterous, poppycock - evolution is definitely not a science. Philosophy at best.
Q - quit pulling our legs, quibbling. Monkeys => Men...yeah, right?
R - religion - it takes more faith to believe the evolution theory than to believe in a Creator
S - senselessness, stupid, spoofing. What do you think I am stupid? I ain't believing that nonsense.
T - tomfoolery, twaddle - such tomfoolery the evolutionists bring to us. It would be funny if so many folk didn't take it so serious.
U - unreasonable - seriously now...do evolutionists really not get how unreasonable their theory is?
V - vacant - all that wishful thinking results in a heart and mind that remains vacant
W - witlessness, wacky, wearisome, wishful thinking -
X - X marks the spot. Dig here or there or there and evolution will still find no treasure.
Y - yo-yo - Let's put this idea out. Oops...didn't work. Pull it back. Down, up...all under the guise that the 'science' is still being refined. Good luck with that.
Z - zany, zero - evolutionary thinking adds up to zero. Well, almost zero.
Perhaps I have missed a few adjectives. Feel free to add them in the comments and I'll gladly update the list.
Comments
So basically a guy who knows nothing about the science just lists off an alphabetized list of derogatory comments.
Very creative. You must be so proud.
Here is how complete your lack of understanding is.
We are monkeys. Creationists knew this 100 years before Darwin wrote his book. This fact hasn't suddenly changed just because you don't like science.
Just so everyone is clear what Bill is saying he believes...
Noah had to carry 2-7 of each of the millions of species of animal on the ark, because unlike groups like Answers in Genesis he doesn't even believe in speciation.
So Bill is a wildly more extreme fundamentalist than even Ken Ham.
You do not seriously believe Christian mythology of the creation -- do you ???
Who do you believe created the Christian god ???
I guess Bill just got tired. Its so much easier to just stand there like a child, shake your head, stomp your feet and say no.
There's nothing to this article.
Nor the previous one which is simply Bill's argument from incredulity. He doesn't get it, doesn't see how it could work, so it must be wrong.
Here's how we human's find useful knowledge. One way or another we build a conceptual model of how something works...sort of the the empirical equivalent of a formula. We plug in data (like numbers) and see if it works. If not, we look for a new model.If it does we keep on trying more. Once it always works we say it looks pretty good. After a while we say, we'll take as fact (until and if, we find things that don't work). If we never find things that don't work, we're pretty confident we've got it right. At this point we're really sure, because the facts always fit, and no facts contradicting the main points. Absolute? Of course not. Tentatively a fact. Yup.
@Al...you got it. Evolution will never work no matter how many times you try. I think that's what bill is trying to say.
you moron, you didn't read it right, he was saying that this duche doesn't understand, he wont listen to reason, and that evolution is a fact for now because no other representation has been shown to be better. What was your reading grade in school, a zero or did you drop out after science class started talking about evolution like bill?
But no one thinks the weird strawman of science that Bill has in head would work either.
I do hope Bill follows up this article with one about how he thinks Noah cared for all the millions and millions of animals and birds and fish and bugs etc on his boat for a year. Should be quite entertaining.
Are Sauropods clean? Would Noah had to have 2 Argentinosaurus on board or 7?
Bath Tub,
I guess Bill is not up for foolishness. He should be, though. The article is, after all ABC's of evolution. You may have that already, so why not discuss your question concerning the ABC's of D.I.?
Your point is well taken. There is such a thing as 'micro evolution'. If you did not know that, then, maybe you were not being sarchastic as much as you may have been communicating your ignorance of the Bible.
Genesis 7:14 has your answer. I have a question for you. How many breeds of canine entered the arc? You may answer that. Or, you can answer this; 'How many Lop eared rabbits entered the arc?. Please do visit my bio and email me if I don't get back to your.
To answer your question concerning Sauropods, I had to look that up. There were none on the arc.
As for you being able to answer my question by researching the internet; you will not be able to. The answer is in the Bible. To answer you must understand what is said in Genesis 7:14.
Bill,
as for you, I think Bath Tub shut your mouth. Why did you not answer his questions? Darwin's Theories are not 'assinine'. I think he really believed it. His view from 175 years ago was pretty much limited to what he had available to him. Since then, biologist have been working to explain his theory and provide more evidence. Take the Discovery Institute, for example. They have been working to show the proponants of Natural Selection what they missed and where they are going wrong. The great thing about that, is, biologist who support N.S. can not borrow from what proponents of I.D. have theorized. So, they just attempt to block films containing information that really jolts Darwin's theories.
There is a lot of work invested in creating theories for N.S.. Don't demean it by calling it 'assinine'. Furthermore, you are writing a Christian article. This entry is unbecoming Christ like.
This article is childish, but it is also indicative of the utter intellectual vacancy of Young Earth Creationism.
Ridicule is what you do when you have no arguments left. There is no defense of ridicule because there's nothing to defend.
I've read a lot of stupid things in my time but none match the stupidity of Young Earth Creationists. You know absolutely nothing about evolution (the real theory of evolution not the garbage spoon fed you by pastors and those morons at the Discovery Institute). The Discovery Institute isn't doing real science because they started from the premise the Bible is historically accurate and they seek out evidence to match it. The problem with that is they ignore all the mountains of evidence that point to the Bible being crap.
I've yet to hear one original argument from a YEC. Every argument proposed by them has been debunked by real scientists. Yours are nothing new.
I don't know whether to call "shame" on the Examiner for letting this garbage onto the printed page, or laud them for letting an idiot freely display his idiocy for everyone to see.
You're right Bill, because Mud Man and Rib Woman just make so much more sense. I can understand your ignorance of biology, but what is your excuse for poor writing?
@ Brian- your comment "Ridicule is what you do when you have no arguments left. There is no defense of ridicule because there's nothing to defend." This is pretty much what evolutionists do to YECs. Ridicule them. Is that what you meant?
Is there an irony meter in the universe that could withstand the irony of a Young Earth Creationist accusing others of ignorance?
Well, that was a mature and rational argument. I'm thoroughly convinced now.
How is idiotic crap like this even allowed to be published. No wonder the examiner has gone straight to the gtound.
Ah,another gem of a rational,logical argument providing solid provable evidence that the life on earth was magically created 6000 years ago in 6 day,complete with herbivore dinosaurs and a wooden boat containing 2 of everything(including whales,squid dolphins and beluga whales.way to go lad,way to go.
Wow. This newspaper is terrible. Seriously, The Onion is not considered more reliable news then this to me.
Wow, this is compelling. Never before have I seen such a well crafted rebuttal of the theory of evolution by natural selection. I must renounce my belief in it right now! I salute your rhetorical skills, good sir!
By the way, Billy, we are making fun of your article here: fstdt(dot)com(slash)QuoteComment(dot)aspx?QID=69447
Drop in if you’d like to.
More evidence that America is a nation of imbeciles.
Hilarious - you've got the smug ignorance of a creationist down exactly! I almost believed you were serious for a minute there!
E, M, N, O, S, V, W, and Y can all be applied to creationism without even changing a single word. And they'd be more accurate.
N - nonsense, nitwittedness - Nonsense of the highest order.
Creationism simplified.
V - vacant - all that wishful thinking results in a heart and mind that remains vacant
W - witlessness, wacky, wearisome, wishful thinking -
Fundamentalism in a nutshell
Y - yo-yo - Let's put this idea out. Oops...didn't work. Pull it back. Down, up...all under the guise that the 'science' is still being refined. Good luck with that.
Try to get creationism taught in school! Fail. Pull it back!
Try to get Intelligent design taught in school. Fail. Pull it back!
Try to get ID recognized as science. Fail. Pull it back!
Try to 'teach the controversy'! Fail. Pull it back.
What were you saying about yo-yos?
I cannot understand why everybody in the comments is being so generous... Calling "article" to this clumsily woven collection of immature ideas is easily an overstatement.
prove to me you can have life from mud and electricity. Define living organism. I don't necessary think religions are true in essentiel but that evolutionnist theory is absolutely ridiculous. There is a mistery and human choose to call it god; I call it life force like in star wars. hahahahah
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!