State nixes stimulus funded road signs


State ends policy of erecting stimulus signs.

 The Georgia Department of Transportation on Monday announced the end of a policy requiring contractors to install road signs indicating projects funded by federal stimulus funds.

 The signs were developed in an act to create transparency by allowing the public to see where their tax dollars were being spent, and were labeled with “recovery.org” - the federal government’s website tracking the flow of money related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

 The signs, on average, cost around $1300 to erect, and critics cite the procedure as no more than costly public relations on the part of the Obama Administration.

 A report from the Atlanta Journal Constitution last month estimated the total cost of erecting the signs to reach $600,000, which set off a slew of public outcry. The GDOT admitted that both the AJC report and the ensuing negative public opinion influenced the decision to pull the plug on the plan.

 The federal government does not require states to erect the signs, and many states originally opted out of the procedure. 

For more info: See where your tax dollars are going HERE. don't forget to subscribe to my page and follow me on Twitter @Matt_Cornelius.

Advertisement

, Atlanta Alternative Transportation Examiner

Matt is a native Atlantan and knows first-hand the headaches of getting around town. He'll keep you up to speed on what he believes will get the city rolling into the 21st century, one commuter at a time. Find him at matthewrcornelius(at)gmail(dot)com.

Comments

  • Mark 3 years ago

    It's amazing the ways govt can find to waste our money. At least they are really good at something.

  • Peter King 3 years ago

    This sounds just like all the other transportation policy in this state.

  • Jamie Newport 3 years ago

    Why do I need to know how it's funded, I'm pretty sure I'm paying for it no matter what it is!

  • Donna Schindler 3 years ago

    I think it is an important function of government to provide basic services and facilities for its citizens, like transportation, education, safety, protection, and defense. People who do not like countries with basic infrastructure, perhaps can try life in a country like Somalia.

  • Sara C 3 years ago

    It makes me want to go into public budgeting. What an idiot idea to pay all that money for a sign. I'd rather all the stupid marketing materials to employees and free shirts generated by my company would totally be hacked off in favor of raise, personally. Besides, if you have to preach to the choir or market to people already bought in, it is a waste.

  • Matt C 3 years ago

    Love all the comments! Sara C, couldn't agree more with your point - as always, thanks for the comment.

    Donna S - great point as well, but it's important to make the distinction between what is actually providing those services and what is inhibiting them.

    Keep 'em coming.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Today's top buzz...