There may be a legal issue brewing over whether the use of certain proxy servers could be a violation of hacking laws that are in effect. The primary dispute is currently between Craigslist and a company by the name of 3taps. This agency has recently been using proxy servers to mine Craigslist for real estate information and sell it to third party sources. This is proving to be a difficult issue for some courts to grapple with, because it challenges the traditional view of hacking. It may create new ramifications for the way that similar cases are heard when they head to court in the future. Essentially, the dispute arose because 3taps was accessing server information that was posted by Craigslist. Officials through Craigslist formally banned this company from accessing data through its servers. However, 3taps was able to continue collecting by going through a proxy service. This allowed the company to mask its IP address and harvest the data as it always had before. This prompted a legal challenge from the owners of Craigslist, who have become invested in making sure that this company cannot access these data sets any longer. It may be a thorny issue, because some may disagree whether the data constitutes private information. Craigslist filed its lawsuit against 3taps based on a 1984 anti-hacking law. This law stipulates that companies cannot access another computer without asking. However, 3taps did not technically enter in to a physical computer, since the data was not stored there. It simply located the data through servers, which the company argues was publicly posted information. They might need to demonstrate this in court, because the case does not seem to be resolved any time soon. Some people will be interested in seeing how the USA proxy rules. He has refused to dismiss the case out of hand, saying that it is too complicated to justify this move. Many are wondering whether this ruling will have broader implications coming soon. If the court rules against 3taps, there may be many other sites who are at risk for doing this soon. It may also redefine the way that courts think about data storage and public information. This may have broad implications for some businesses, particularly those that are using cloud storage information. There are many companies that are starting to leave behind physical storage of their data sets. This can help them find the right tools at their disposal, but may jeopardize the safety of their data. They will be interested to see whether these rulings provide new support to their business. Finally, some even think that these cases could have implications for the way that freedom of speech is handled on the internet. There have been a number of these types of cases held before Congress recently. This can help these hearings decide whether the use of these proxy servers can be permissible. Quite a few different businesses and even Tv channels like UK TV may utilize these servers, so they will be interested in hearing the outcome of this case as well.
October 2, 2013