The boys who your father warned you about are still out there but now they're fifty years old and they own beautiful homes and earn over $100,000 a year. They're more dangerous than they were at age twenty five because now they appear honest and wholesome, which makes it easier to lie to women. Also, now they have thirty years of prowling experience and so they're better at it.
They habitually lie to women and profess that they want a committed relationship. They wait for their partner to trust them and then they stop wearing condoms and when women argue with them than they say that they've had an STD exam. They replace their girlfriends every three weeks and they have unprotected sex with the next one and say the same thing to her. To compound the situation, when they ask women if they're taking birth control pills and the women say no because they prefer to use condoms instead, than the guys suspect them of wanting to get pregnant.
They're expert manipulators who make promises that they don't intend to keep, which is the reason why their relationships last for only three weeks. In mainstream culture, three weeks is about the time that a casual dating relationship turns into an exclusive committed relationship, and that's the time when he's expected to begin delivering on his promises. And so he'll brake up with her under various false pretenses or drop off the map. Sometimes he'll stay and pretend like it's still a new, very casual situation as if they just met, and he will continue to do that even after he's been there for three years. With that said, most women get rid of them after about three months.
The women who fall in love with them are not blind or stupid, they're just honest people who expect honesty in return. They base their decisions on the information that their boyfriends give them, which is that it's a committed, exclusive relationship for the long term. There are no red flags: He's been lying to women for thirty years and certainly he knows how. It's not her fault. Worse, when a woman tries to hold onto a man like that than he'll tell her that they were never in a relationship and that she's delusional for thinking that they were.
Delusional. I'll say it again: He's had sex with her a million times and now he's telling her that she's delusional for believing that they were together. The Democrats are nuts for enforcing gun control; they should be passing out a shotgun to every woman in America! Along with custom bullets that say "Prowler" on them to expedite the homicide investigations.
These guys deliberately create the false impression that they're family oriented because it makes them appear safe. It's true that most of them have been married before but it was a business deal: Their ex wives had great jobs and they earned a lot of money and so their marriage was a financial arrangement where their combined income was high enough to qualify for an enormous home loan and a huge business loan so they could flip properties or buy a small business. They also used it to finance expensive cars. When they got divorced both of them had a lot more assets than they would have had if they had never married.
He may have been a traditional family man for two or three years if they had kids together. It's likely that his ex wife returned to work as soon as possible and that she paid for most of the kids' living expenses. Groceries cost about $1,200 to $1,600 per month for a family of four, plus everything else such as daycare, gas, clothes, sports, entertainment, lessons/tutors, Christmas ($1,500 to $3,000), and the co-payments for the pediatrician and dentist. In other words, in his post-divorce life, if he tells his girlfriends that he supported his family than he's probably lying to bolster his image. It's more likely that he paid for the mortgage on the house which was a tax break and a real estate investment to be cashed in later, and for the family expenses that qualify for tax refunds which could be used as a down payment to buy a new SUV for himself.
He won't get remarried until he finds a woman who makes a lot of money, and so in his post-divorce life when he dates women who have average jobs ($37,000 for woman in the U.S. in 2012) and he tells them that he wants to get remarried someday than he's lying to them. He may get remarried but it won't be to any of them and so it's pure dishonesty and fraud in it's most disgraceful form.
If one of his girlfriends gets pregnant than he'll pressure her to get an abortion, and after the legal deadline passes than he'll pressure her to put the baby up for adoption. He will threaten her with a lawsuit to take 100% sole custody of the baby so that he won't have to pay child support. To him it's a cost-benefit analysis: Either pay $40,000 in legal fees now to take the baby and stop paying child support, or pay the mother almost $200,000 in child support spread out over eighteen years.
Before paternity tests existed it was very common for fathers to deny that they had sex with the babies' mothers. They openly slandered the mothers as delusional. If she had witnesses who could testify that they dated than he would tell the judge that he's infertile.
Coroner's autopsies now include a pregnancy test and paternity test for strange deaths such as a healthy young woman who died in her sleep because if she was pregnant than she was probably murdered by her boyfriend.
I find it interesting that men who are reckless and dishonest to women in their personal lives are able to keep senior management jobs at large companies because some of their subordinates are female.