We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 75°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

Predators to be allowed off of sex registry

SOR
SOR
Photo credit: 
WSBT

    The Indiana State Supreme Court has overturned a law that was set to protect the public. Part of Indiana's sex offender law was placed to be retroactive. It was a state amendment to Zachary's law, and now the highest court in Indiana has declared it unconstitutional. (http://www.theindychannel.com/news/21642848/detail.html)
   Zachary's law was enacted by the state in 1994. Zachary's Law was named after ten-year-old Zachary Snider of Cloverdale, Indiana, who was molested and murdered by a neighbor, Christopher Stevens.
Stevens had a previous conviction for Child molestation and served 1 year of a 4 year sentence. Upon release, Stevens moved in with his father.
   Zachary Snider, age 10, lived in the same neighborhood and was often seen with 20 year old Stevens. Though Zachary's father told Stevens to stay away from Zachary, their friendship continued. After Zachary turned up missing, Stevens confessed to the crime as well as to having sexual relations with Zachary. He also confessed to molesting 25 to 30 other children.
   In an appeal of his conviction for the murder of Zachary Snider, the court found regarding Christopher Stevens that: This evidence included testimony of a witness that, upon the defendant's prior release from jail onto probation for a previous conviction of child molesting, the defendant had declared that he planned to kill his next child molesting victim to avoid returning to jail.
   The defendant had admitted to a family member that he killed Zachary Snider and disclosed where he had concealed the body. After his arrest, the defendant admitted in a videotaped confession that he had repeatedly molested the ten-year old boy and then killed him, first attempting to do so by suffocating him with a pillow, then by strangling him with a cord, and finally by suffocating him by wrapping a trash bag over his head. This crime occurred while the defendant was on probation for a prior conviction of child molesting.
   Zachary's law requires offenders convicted of specified sex and violent crimes to register with local law enforcement agencies in the area they reside or intend to reside for more than seven days.
Three years later, the state added the retroactive law. This law states that a convicted sex offender, had they been convicted after Zachary's Law was enacted, will fall under the Zachary's Law and must register with local law enforcement.
   There were two challenges to the retroactive law. Richard Wallace and Todd Jensen were both convicted of sex offenses and penalized for their crimes. Using the retroactive law, they were required to register with their respective law enforcement agencies. They appealed that requirement.
The Indiana Supreme Court overturned the registry requirement, stating that the retroactive law was against Indiana Constitutional protections (http://www.indianalawblog.com/archives/2009/04/ind_decisions_s_427.html). Indiana's Constitution's Bill of Rights says in Article 1 Section 24 ' No ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligations of contracts, shall ever be passed' (http://www.law.indiana.edu/uslawdocs/inconst/art-1.html). Ex post fact translates to 'after the fact'.
   In Indiana's two largest cities (Indianapolis and Fort Wayne) and their counties (Marion and Allen) this could potentially release over 1000 sex offenders from the registry. Lt. Bob Hanna, the overseer of the Marion County registry, told local news station WRTV “We're not going to remove anybody. We're taking no enforcement action. As far as removing faces, names and addresses, we won't do that without a court order."

 

Advertisement

, Huntington County Political Buzz Examiner

Mark Shoffner is thirty nine and married to a wonderful woman, Shannon. They have six children including one from a former marriage. Mark has been involved with politics since the age of thirteen. Email him at lowcountry46750@yahoo.com.

Comments

  • Richard L. Kent, Esq. 2 years ago

    Damn that Constitution! Such an annoyance!

    What will they come up with next?

    Respecting religious practice in public because of the First Amendment? Letting people own handguns? Allowing people to protest in front of abortion clinics?

    (((Naaaaa....))

  • Letsgetreal 2 years ago

    Where does law enforcement or the Attorney General get the authority to ignore the Supreme Court of Indiana. This is a direct violation of "separation of Powers and I might add a "contempt of Court charge" against them.
    We are supposed to be a nation of law. Yet in the name of votes for politicians and ratings for the media, we have created an unnecessary hysteria and laws that "endanger children and society." Many unconstitutional laws in the name of prevention that do not prevent.

    I am in total agreement with Indiana's Supreme Court decision.

    Ohio's Supreme Court has recently heard four cases View the proceedings by Goggling "OH- Lawyers fight law on sex offenders before Ohio Supreme Court"

    I recommend all who disagree with Indiana's decision listen to the Justices questions in the Ohio cases. It is YOUR RIGHTS, at stake. Your children s rights and your grand children.

    I'm a firm believer in the Constitution of the United States.

  • Letsgetreal 2 years ago

    Lt. Bob Hanna has a "court Order." It is from the SUPREME Court of Indiana. It basically says that Lt Hanna, or anyone else cannot Keep these people on a the registry.

    Is he crazy or just looking for political gain?

  • Anita 2 years ago

    This case is a perfect example of why the "one size fits all" attitude toward all registred s*x offenders is totally wrong.
    The boy in this case is a murderer! The other 1,000 are NOT.
    There is no registry for murders. The Indiana Supreme Court has declared the retroactivity of the SO Registry unconstitutional.
    Does Law enforcement have the right to pick and choose which parts of the Constitution they will abide by, and which ones they will defy? That attitude can only lead to chaos.
    Want to protect Society? Protect the Constitution!!!

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...