We all know the confusion that existed as information came out about the Sandy Hook violence, not all of this turned out to be true. During times of terrible actions, those closest to the events are not seen as acting normally, this is part of what we do in grieving. But many times we also see similarities and connections which do not stand as they pass inspections and examinations. Controversies will still exist as to the how and why of Sandy Hook, but profiting from such for private use has no business be interpreted as public information. Still there are those with questions and reports that need to be addressed, so let’s take one more time look at some of them and see what we find. To this end, this report is to cover one such video which offers such reports and confusions, at first glance the video seems to support other claims.
Looking closely at the video we can see more clearly, as we let the facts speak we see how things are confusing and misguided. Let’s start with the weapon said to be used, the medical examiner is noted for saying all victims were killed by the rifle, and later we see a video of a rifle being taken out a car trunk. First the rifle said to be used was a Bushmaster an AR-15 styled rifle, the one taken from the trunk was an AK series. This can be clearly seen by the action being worked and the shape of the muzzle and butt stock regions. Next the medical examiner is noted once more as not getting to the “primary” victims, the question is why. The answer is easy, the examinations are done on a first serve basis, thus the children were taken in first for the sake of the parents' grief. As for the mother, her death was not as first known, it took time to backtrack to the home.
The police were called and responded quickly, they secured the area, awaited orders while inside they needed to look for evidence, witnesses and insure all suspects were controlled. This brings up the man in the car; if he was sitting up front he was not arrested. The reasons for this are simple; the police could have done a gun powder residue test and noted he was clean, thus not part of the shootings. Releasing him with parents grieving could have endangered him; the police had orders to secure the area that include parents. As for the police standing around, the public was very cooperative and did not cause more matters for them to deal with.
The ATF and other federal governmental agencies do perform drills and lectures a lot, this to train for events but the similarity of these drills and the events are concerning. The only reason to be suspicious is in regard to their being needed and not immediately attending to support the police. Yet with the situation contained and the school secured there was no need for additional support. The fact they were able to predict such events would occur and be in the process of preparing for such, indicates the information they have is closely aligned with events occurring. Thus somewhere they are predicting these events with accuracy, and using this to offer means to stop such before they happen.
Again there must be agreement in that some people will want to profit from these tragic events, and there is indications of such by those interviewed for the news and presented on this video. But if these persons are connected or just out for personal promotions and satisfactions is not clear. The news agencies are public information sources, reporting what the public needs to hear so it should be the best facts available. That does not mean we do not make mistakes, only that we are to check and insure our facts are as accurate as we can make them. Another video shows as well the little girls dress, and suggest it was worn by her younger sister. These videos brings up the many problems with reporting such events, the confusion lasts for a long time and addressing this confusion must be done effectively.
This video reflects upon the information obtained, much of which was later found to be inaccurate, but the news agencies did not take time to check facts until later. The facts are we know this town exist, the school exist, and the shooting happened. There will be those grieving, but there are also those wanting to make profit from this grief. Worse among this are those who use this as an excuse to push a political agenda, basing decisions on emotional outcries while pretending to use logic in politics does not solve problems. The public needs protections but as Dr. Susan Gratia once stated, this includes the politicians’ ideologies and personal interest. The public will be more interested in this matter as time goes along, and we will see new evidence present itself.
Being careful to examine such information, we can discover what the truth or lie is. We should never accept something just at face value, but consider the information given and the sources we can gain to confirm this as true. Then we understand the facts, then we can reason through the personal biases and political ideologies to see how it is marketed to direct. In this case, the video looks over the many different means facts come out, and how easily they are found not to be true but still accepted.
Contact: Michael Pulse MPulse@truth-things.biz Author of: The Truth of Things
CEO of Stone Rose LLC Profile on Elance: http://mpulse-stone-rose.elance.com
Comments