Politics: Legal realities of gun control

Reality as we exist, is what we all want to know but can only really understand through theories which present our combined thoughts on the matter. The realities of gun control attempts to stop violence will never happen, as we know already when centralized authority attempts to micro-manage others, competitive levels change. The realities of our world are based on our being mortals, therefore things are not perfect in any sense. We have created the means to survive based on the exchanges we offer to each other, thus exists a human chain of production. This reaches out to all points of the same economic spectrum, even among politics and it is well known that with any large amount of violence there come funds as well. Bonds are used to build up and wars are fought only when one side thinks it has built up enough resources to take from others.
We have a long chain of events used to produce one round, one shot for any firearm coming from this human production chain. The individuals involved are not held accountable if such rounds are used wrongfully. This follows the same principle for those producing cars or other products when used to harm others. The mechanics of production are not held accountable but the consciences mind in charge is held. All the many steps have individuals involved in production, but these individual decisions are removed from the final events. They do not make the final decision; only make the system possible to operate. Inanimate products do not react or operate on their own, so long as safety measures are taken all are safe. But there are processes and products where a human mind offers alternatives along the way. In this we hold accountable each who acted inappropriately, as the accumulation of actions takes effect on others. Having actions accumulate and knowing they are directed for illegal or wrongful purposes, is in complacent to agreeing with each other’s action for the evil one ends with.
Firearms are not killing people; it is the people who want to do bad things that are killing. As humans to human, we see each other as equals and one does want harm to others in this mindset. But if we put individuals in a situation where they can not leave, instead making them feel they must do harm or be harmed, there will be violence. Our instinct for survival being so strong, we will act as needed to secure our lives. This includes assuring only we have the rights to take such action, not the oppositions.
Removal of any weapon(s) does not deter this, for time and again we have seen the mind create another weapon as an alternative. Restrictions on any weapon only allow alternatives weapons to be developed into more efficient killing means, thus the harm does not end only changes. Competition being the bases of modern theory, than we must understand putting stress on any system will increase the competitions abilities. Defense Distributed alternative weapons production has already shown how increases become equally or more dangerous than before. Thus one has created only an arms race, with each side building up until all are dead. In the end with so many dead, who will be left to care about the issue which started it all?
The only way to reduce violence is to reach every individual with the knowledge that violence is not needed. Any allowances made for violence only indicates its acceptance, therefore it has utility in a civil society. And there is the problem, as individuals are allowed to gain from violence, their actions build upon this method and infrastructure will develop around this concept to keep violence alive. Therefore, it is not only the availability of weapons, but the structure formed by individuals who gain from collectively designed violence strategies, which are causing more violence.
Now Obama has been forced by the collective mindset to take action(s), but some are questioning this mindset and who is in control of it. Looking around the world we can see the many places where violence rules the land, but can we also state such is reported equally? No, for as the major competitor we are also the major source of information, thus we report the most accurately and most in line with our own mindsets as the collective has required. But until one is willing to take the money out of violence, to keep those who profit the most by its use accountable, the violence will be allowed to continue. And Obama, like most politicians, has no idea how to do this. But at least we will see the Center for Disease Control start to look; how far it will get at finding the truth will be noted. Yet if all the gun control advocates state what is causing violence is found wrong, will there be any changes or more lies from Washington, to cover it up?

Contact: Michael Pulse MPulse@truth-things.biz Author of: The Truth of Things
CEO of Stone Rose LLC Profile on Elance: http://mpulse-stone-rose.elance.com

Advertisement

, Oklahoma City Business Strategies Examiner

Michael Pulse graduate South University 2010, gained a Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration. His family enjoys spending time with him, and encourages both his studies and work related activities. His many years in both the military and civilian employment allow for unique means of...

Today's top buzz...