.jpg)
Caution: by dipping your digits into a campaign
cookie jar you could catch a cause or a political
pinprick. (AP Photo)
Since politics has become a year-round hunt with no definable season, this article is offered as a public service for those who want to become political sharpshooters but aren't completely familiar with the vocabulary of this most ancient and ruthlessly brutal of human blood sports.
Politics – The art of manipulating people. This definition can be infinitely refined and redefined but those five words are its essence.
Democracy – A system of thuggary in which the majority enforces its will on everyone else, as opposed to the original United States, which was a constitutional republic featuring a minimal government empowered to protect the rights of individuals from the thuggary of the majority.
Fair Share – A term imposed by the recipient of anything on the supplier of anything to guarantee the highest possible share for the recipient. The term is always defined by the recipient. Politicians define the state's "fair share" of taxpayer's incomes. Socialists define a society's "fair share" of its most productive citizen's efforts. Unions define their employee's "fair share" of corporate profits (and then define their own "fair share" of their member's dues). Welfare beneficiaries define their "fair share" of government largess. The fairness of the share is inevitably enforced by some form of coercion.
Fair Trade – A treaty between two countries in which the more powerful country uses its political clout to enforce its own definition of "fair" on the other country.
Fair Tax – A system of taxation that abolishes the IRS, dramatically simplifies the tax-paying process and is equitable for all economic classes while guaranteeing that nothing of substance will change because citizens will still be forced to cough up nearly half their incomes to corrupt politicians who will continue to spend trillions more in revenue than what they collect.
Level Playing Field – A euphemism concocted by incompetent business boobs demanding special interest legislation designed to drag their skilled competitors down to their own level of ineptitude so they won't have to actually compete with them.
Unfair Trade Practices – A term used by incompetent business boobs to define the sagacious business acumen of their competitors. A typical cure for politically manufactured "Unfair Trade Practices" is called "Antitrust Suit."
Change – An utterly shallow word masquerading as a set of meaningful ideas which, when repeated mindlessly, acts to "energize a whole new generation of voters" because those new voters have just emerged from government-run holding cells known as "high schools" where their brains were successfully stripped of the very concept of meaningful ideas.
Move forward – A meaningless phrase used whenever a candidate gets caught hand-in-cookie-jar. Example: Reporter says, "You passed a syrup subsidy bill after receiving donations from the syrup lobby." Candidate says, "Oh, well, we need to forget the past and move forward." In today's Pabulum Press reportage, candidates usually get away with this.
Libertarian – A concept entailing personal freedom and individual responsibility that scares the living bejesus out of politicians from presidents to dogcatchers because they know that if the idea of actual, genuine, no-lip-service freedom ever catches on they'll all lose their cushy con jobs.
Politicogenic – In the same sense that "anthropogenic" means "human-caused" and is routinely found as an adjective preceding such phrases as "global warming," "climate change," "pollutants," "methane emissions" and "greenhouse gasses," the term "politicogenic" means "politician-caused" and should rightfully be frontloaded onto words and phrases like "inflation," "war," "loss of freedom," "energy crisis," "starvation," "genocide" and so on and on and on.
Envirogenic – A term meaning "Death by Environmentalism," i.e., an international ban on DDT that has allowed 50 million people to die from malaria since 1972, branding bio-engineered crops that resist harsh climates, insects, diseases and don't need chemical pesticides as "Frankenfood" while millions starve worldwide, demanding high-mileage cars which require smaller and lighter construction which increases highway fatalities, and et cetera.
Photogenic – Looking good during a ten second sound bite. What did you think it meant?
Comments
Actually, DDT was never banned for use in malaria control, and has been used for this purpose continuously from the 1950s though to today. The 1972 ban that you refer to was the US ban on non-public health uses of DDT within the US, and so had nothing to do with malaria. True, people continue to die from malaria at an alarming rate, but that has nothing to do with restrictions on DDT. Get your facts straight, and stop regurgitating baloney from newsmax and other far rightwing "news" sources.
According to the Malaria Foundation International (MFI), “groups such as Greenpeace, World Wildlife Fund, Physicians for Social Responsibilty [sic] and over 300 other environmental organizations” advocated for an outright World Health Organization ban of DDT. Donald R. Roberts, Ph.D., who has “worked in the area of malaria vector ecology and malaria control for 32 years” wrote the following: “The result of these policies and politics is that many developing countries have already been forced to abandon their public health use of DDT. Almost without exception, where this has occurred, malaria rates have increased … Today, if UNEP [United Nations Environment Programme] negotiations are successful in the unconditional banning of DDT, which is the intent; even more millions will suffer increased death and disease from malaria.” The MFI successfully fought against the ban.
Good read (I especially repulsed by 'fair share' language) but I do have an objection to the FairTax paragraph.
-Spending up to the poverty line and used items are not taxed. So the FairTax tends to be progressive but it is not 'forced' in the same way as our current system. Change there.
-Why are corrupt politicians against the FairTax if it doesn't change anything? Because they fear its transparency and the destruction of the current lobbyist sold tax code.
-As much as I abhor how much DC is spending the FairTax while still being revenue neutral will put a huge downward pressure on the rate and spending as the cost of government is felt every day at every cash register. It's not printed now.
-The economy is a mess now. The FairTax would eliminate so many roadblocks to American ingenuity and government control of the economy through the tax code. A stock market and businesses expanding faster than we've seen before is a lot of change.
The problem with the Fair Tax is (a) it’s still a tax and (b) even if the tax code is changed while nothing else changes (government size, power, scope, reach, perpetual spending increases) the powercrats will find ways to undo its intent. Unintended consequences apply to the Fair Tax just as it applies to all other good intentions. The Fair Tax will change nothing until the government genie is shoved back into the bottle of constitutional limitations, which means cutting its size by about 85% - or abolishing it entirely. I know many libertarians have been wooed by the Fair Tax, but it’s still just a pig with lip gloss.
Great read! Wish I had that photogenic thingy covered...LOL
All taxes are simply theft by another name. People should be perfectly free to pay for whatever sort of government they wanted, just as long as that government had no power to rob, kill or order the lives of those who did not subscribe to it.
You "Free Taxers" are perfectly free to tax yourselves, but leave me out of it.
I don't need or want your government.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!