This is what a Police State looks like
The Oakland Police Department that oversaw use of excessive force against Occupy Oakland human rights defenders on October 25 is now hiding information about what really happened, refusing to hand it over to ACLU according to the civil liberties organization issued a statement Tuesday telling OPD to start following its own policies.
"The ACLU of Northern California and the National Lawyers' Guild sent a public records request about OPD's use of force on the night of October 25, 2011 on demonstrators supporting Occupy Oakland. The response we received is both infuriating and misguided," ACLU says.
"The department had claimed the records are part of an open, ongoing investigation; the ACLU contends the law exempts only records pertaining to criminal investigations, while these records had to be prepared pursuant to the department's crowd-control policy," reportedMercury News Tuesday.
Before admitting it was refusing to supply almost all the information, the OPD's Chief of Staff prefaced the Department's response to ACLU with this statement:
"The Oakland Police Department understands that the greater and more unfettered the public official's power, the greater the public's interest in monitoring the governmental action. We recognize and acknowledge your October 26th, 2011 request furthers our commitment to this obligation."
"Not only is this a complete contradiction, it also reveals something very troubling. Police officers actually do not have "unfettered" discretion in using force against political protesters. It's constrained by, among other things, the constitutional prohibition against excessive force and OPD's own Crowd Control Policy, which as we've previously noted, was repeatedly breached that night."
"Juxtaposed against OPD's decision to withhold reports documenting its use of force that night — a decision we think misguided as a matter of law and policy (see our letter back to OPD today) — OPD's response underscores the gap between its policy and practice. The agency has a great Crowd Control Policy, but doesn't abide by it. The agency celebrates its "commitment" to "the public's interest in monitoring … governmental action," but withholds essential documents.
"Human rights defender, Iraq Veteran Scott Thomas Olsen, 24, was stated by hospital officials to have been in critical condition with a fractured skull, brain swelling and brain damage risk after police allegedly shot him in the face in the attack on Occupy Oakland following its peaceful demonstration of over 1000 protesters exercising Fifth Amendment Rights."















Comments