Before this writer even gets to unspinning President Barack Obama's lies and spin, let us first address the systemic lies upon which the alleged need for nationalized health insured was based.
- Both Republicans and Democrats took bribes and/or campaign contributions from Insurance Companies and Hospitals to NOT fix traditional American Healthcare. It is not a legitimate argument to say national healthcare is necessary to fix the healthcare system when, by our elected officials own design, they did not fix traditional healthcare;
- Most states already had healthcare safety nets in place for the poor. In Minnesota, that plan was known as MinnesotaCare. Ergo, another premise for Obamacare aka Affordable Care act, was false.
- Social Security was pillaged government making it necessary for money for healthcare for aging baby boomers to be funded on the backs of Millennials. (Also Union health benefits for retirees were underfunded and nationalized healthcare would relieve Unions of that partially funded financial obligation - refunds to Union members if Obamacare remains standing anyone?)
Now, from these first three systemic lies, it should be clear that Republicans and Democrats artificially and, likely intentionally, fabricated the pretext to justify the need for national healthcare legislation. Legislation that would come to be known as Obamacare aka Affordable Care Act..
For this and other reasons this writer often asserts on his Twitter account @DMashak:
The alleged cavernous divide between rank&file Americans is an artificial construct designed to allow the 1&only1 #rulingclass pretending(cont)...
(cont) to be 2 major parties to divide/conquer &distract #WETHEPEOPLE while the #rulingclass robs us blind. #WTH Pls wake up America
This writer has previously written that Progressivism actually intends to reassert the Divine Right of Kings Governance Doctrine in a more format the masses would be more willing to accept. Under Progressivism, Educated Elites chosen from the wealthy, leisure class who have time to study governance, will take the place of Kings. Whereas Kings invoked the Divine Right of Kings (The King is a God or representative of God here on earth and therefore no earthly being can question their decisions), Educated Elites will merely cite that they are more educated and therefore the ignorant masses must just accept their decisions. You can read more extensively about this in the following article:
UNIFIED THEORY OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS http://t.co/X4RMrfTi2m
More direct evidence of why America's Ruling Class is intentionally acting as it is can be found in a previous national healthcare proponents past. Hillary Clinton's 1969 Thesis on Saul Alinsky http://t.co/tluZUJlRCK And if the connection is still not clear or buried too deep, this graphic to the left (or this link http://bit.ly/1goweLS )should spell it out for you. In short, Alinsky's Rules for Radicals spells out the first step in taking control of the masses is nationalized healthcare. Are we all on the same page now?
Having exposed the false pretexts purporting to necessitate national healthcare, let us now direct our attention to some of the false spins and lies used to pass Obamacare and/or those reiterated at during President Barack Obama's April Fools Speech.
Can this writer ask, "Where did that original 7M goal come from?" And following that, "What does 7.1M mean? 7.1M what?"
At various times before Obamacare, aka Affordable Care Act, various proponents emphasized the large number of uninsured persons in America. The number that sticks in this writer's head is 16%. The Fast Math on 315 Million Americans gives a result of 50.4 Million. And so it is with wonder that this writer asks, "From where did this 7 Million figure come?" To this writer, albeit one of the ignorant American masses, it occurs that the 7 Million figure was involed as an easily achievable straw man. King of like the illusion of the Wizard in the Wizard of Oz, it appears that the 7 Million figure was intended to distract Americans from the lie of 16%. But, being allegedly ignorant like the rest of the masses, perhaps this writer is wrong. Perhaps, President Barack Obama, you could share why a flashy, cool, explicit graphic demonstrating how many previously uninsured are now insured was not central to your April Fools Speech? Would that not be a better measure of the Success of Obamacare aka Affordable Care Act? And, what does that 7 Million mean exactly, they visited the site, they entered some data, they selected a plan, they paid for a plan, they got a free plan, they got a subsidized plan? Is this writer asking too much?
And, of course, President Barack Obama made no mention of the 6 Million (March 13) who lost their insurance coverage. So, fast math says that is a net gain of 1.1 Million(of 315 Million)?
Next, another number of some importance is how many young folks have signed up for Obamacare aka Affordable Care Act. In as much as the experts have said that the premiums of the young (who presumably have fewer healthcare needs than the older) are necessary to subsidize the expense of the more seasoned citizens of America, shouldn't that also be a prominently and explicitly displayed number? Now, for those of you who aren't keeping up with President Barack Obama's magic act distractions, President Barack Obama cites how all these youth 18 to 26 are now magically covered. Unfortunately, President Barack Obama didn't choose to ask all those parents of 18 to 26 year olds how much their premiums were going up. Though most parents overwhelmingly love their children, how happy were these parents that President Barack Obama decided they should stay in the next longer & put the financial burden of his healthcare promises on their backs? But then dependency, per Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, is what Progressives want to create.
Is it out of line for this reporter to ask President Barack Obama to stop playing shell games with the numbers?
Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.
Now, let us succinctly address a series of lies and/or spins invoked during President Barack Obama's April Fools Day Speech. As we stated previously, pointing to Obamacare, aka the Affordable Care Act, as fixing shortcomings of traditional healthcare is an illegitimate argument in the face of traditional healthcare not being fixed resulting from the deliberate actions of both major parties. Stop it already. It is irritating to have the lie repeated over and over.
Next, President Barack Obama trotted out the seemingly rare examples of persons who allegedly were finding cheaper coverage. Again, stop with the numbers shell games already. How many are paying more? How many are paying less? And how many are receiving government subsidies? This writer trusts his fellow Americans to make the correct decisions, if they provided the truth rather than lies.
Now, President Barack Obama asserted that health costs are down. Based on previous lies like "keep your insurance, keep your doctor, period", this writer is forced to ask President Barack Obama to provide a link to a credible source which corroborate your assertion that healthcare cost have came down. Please?
Now lets address President Barack Obama's lie about Death Panels not being in Obamacare (aka Affordable Care Act). It is disingenuous for anyone to assert there are not Death Panels in Obamacare just because Obamacare doesn't call them Death Panels. First, it is hard to believe that the government who implemented "death panels" in the government run Veterans hospitals, would not incorporate the concept in Obamacare (aka the Affordable Care Act)
WSJ: VA pushes vets to consider death as an alternative to treatment http://t.co/LcSjeuceqQ
But instead of Obamacare (aka Affordable Care Act) calling them Death Panels, Obamacare delegates this function to a group called the Health Technology Assessment Commission (HTAC) http://t.co/Xpy79FG5E5 This writer does not know what else to call this assertion: Its either duplicity or a bold faced lie.
So much for at least one of President Barack Obama's detractors' alleged "Tall Tales" being debunked.
Next, America is a Republic not a Democracy. More accurately, America is a Representative, Constitutionally Limited, Republic. Further, WE THE PEOPLE are citizens not subjects. WE THE PEOPLE have unalienable Rights. The majority cannot take away the unalienable, Natural Law Rights of WE THE PEOPLE. Despite what SCOTUS has ruled, Obamacare violates Natural Law and our individual unalienable rights.
A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate.
For future reference, President Barack Obama, since you have exhibited a propensity for lying, could I respectfully ask you to touch a finger to your head when you are telling the truth? This will aid me in making dissection of your speeches and statements for time and resource efficient. (And if you could cut downn on the lying, this writer would appreciate it, as it makes my head hurt.)
Which brings us to addressing the sum total of the lies told in getting passage of Obamacare; The margin of passage of Obamacare was so small that the small lies made the difference in getting it passed? America is to operate within the parameters and constructs of Natural Law, the Rule of Law, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In particular, the Rule of Law prescribes that all persons are supposed ruled and judged by one set of laws applied equally, regardless of wealth, status or position. This Rule of Law is of importance with regard to Obamacare in two ways.
The first way has to do with fraud and nullification of contracts. If this writer, or any other American, induces another to sign a contract with fraudulent representations, the contract is null and void. If all Americans are bound by the Rule of Law, how is that Obamacare, the fraudulent representations having been at least partially exposed, is not null and void pursuant to the Rule of Law? (And the elephant in the room asks, "If Obamacare so great and widely supported, why were lies necessary to get it passed in the first place?)
Or does President Barack Obama presume to be king; able to just lie with we, his ignorant subjects, just having to take it?
The next point of Rule of Law to consider is simply this: exempting the President and Congress from Obamacare violates the Rule of Law. Our Elected Officials seem to be creating two classes of people; Aristocrats and us ignorant subjects. This violates the Rule of Law, Natural Law, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. As such, Obamacare is unconstitutional. (And the elephant in the room asks, "Why if Obamacare so great, did Congress, et al exempt themselves?" but can wait unfurl its trunk and use its tusks another day.)
Which brings us to President Barack Obama asking, "Why are so many folks trying to overturn Obamacare?"
Before we go further, we have to redress yet one more lie. It is not the Republican Party trying to overturn Obamacare. For whatever reason, the Republican Party Establishment seems to have adopted the Progressive Agenda. (In this writer's humble opinion RINO is GOP PC for Progressive Republican) This writer's first proof of this is the failure of the Republican Establishment to put forward alternative legislation to Obamacare. Sure, a few "troublemakers" have drafted some proposals, but the actual GOP Establishment has failed to put forward a concerted effort with enthusiasm. In fact, the Republican Establishment actually has turned their backs on not only the TEA Party, but also all rank and file Republicans and the Republican Platform. In truth, the persons trying to overturn Obamacare are the true conservatives, the rank and file membership of the Republican Party, among them being folks in the TEA Party. The Republican dissing of the TEA Party during the alleged government shutdown, sealed this writer's opinion of the current division in the GOP. Obamacare could have been defunded during the budget process. Instead, the Republican Establishment decided to join ranks with the Democrat Establishment, and began the standard strategy of demonizing, discrediting and neutralizing the voices of political dissent.
FBI, COINTELPRO and Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. http://t.co/v80G302IvV
President Barack Obama, with many of the fraudulent representations used to pass Obamacare exposed, dont WE THE PEOPLE deserve a full debate on Obamacare based on truth? Or is it your position that WE THE PEOPLE are not entitled to reconsider OBamacare, despite the many lies now exposed? And, more to lies come with your forewarning to the press that more gliches and issues will arise in the future?
This writer greets your Progressive misdirect debate strategy asserting approximately, "Those who want to overturn Obamacare must explain to the newly insured, why they want to take away their healthcare." This writer does not want to take away or prevent anyone from having healthcare coverage. This writer goes back to the original systemic lies at the beginning of this article. Traditional Healthcare was not fixed while Democrat and Republican alike took bribes and/or campaign contributions from Insurance Companies and Hospitals. Issues like pre-existing conditions could easily been addressed, but deliberately were not to keep the money coming and to set up the pretext for Obamacare. Further, as previously noted, most states already had safety nets. So, President Barack Obama, your whole pretext and context for issuing that politically charged challenge is plainly just so much bullroar.
Among the reasons why this writer and so many others want to overturn Obamacare is that it entirely based on lies and the American Public has the right to make fully informed decisions. Pursuant to Natural Law, this writer trusts his fellow Americans to use their own observations of the real facts to establish truth for themselves.
Further, the pace of enrollment in Obamacare seems to not be commensurate with the enthusiasm alleged and the alleged numeric need for nationalized healthcare asserted to get passage of Obamacare. (And the near 30% of the 7.1 Million enrolling in the final 2 days before the deadline indicates (it is a fabrication, or) people are more signing up for Obamacare to avoid penalities than because their was a pent up demand for medical services) The government's seeming shell game regarding the numbers causes this writer to believe that the actually number of uninsured who want, but cannot afford healthcare coverage was grossly overstated. As since the magnitude of the problem was cited as the moral and logistical imperative requiring the whole American Healthcare system be involved, if the actual numbers are far fewer, we must reconsider Obamacare.
Let us go back and fix the problems with traditional healthcare and provide a safety net for the real, smaller number of folks who want but cannot afford healthcare coverage. Some have suggested that the numbers to date demonstrate the actual numbers of uninsured could easily be absorbed, and much more efficiently, into the existing medicare/medicaid program.
Finally, with regard to President Barack Obama saying the time for debate and repeal is over, this writer simply reminds him of Prohibition. America can correct its mistakes. Obamacare is a mistake induced by lies. As there were many material misrepresentations in the passage of Obamacare, there was nevert a meeting of minds and therefore Obamacare is null and void.
Americans are entitled to make decisions upon being fully and truthfully informed of the facts.
Government that relies upon lies to falsely induce its individual citizens to accept proposed legislation is not legitimate,it is tyranny!
President Barack Obama, if you truly cared about the growing Wealth Disparity in America, you would expend your efforts on auditing and ending the Privately owned Federal Reserve Bank, ending Fiat Money and QE3, forcing Banks to pay Fair Market Value for licenses for the National Resource that is Fractional Reserve Banking and order Congressional Insider Trading to end by executive order and/or by having Attorney General Holder and/or SCOTUS take up the issue.
Until then, this writer operates with the belief that President Barack Obama (and the Establishment of both major political parties) is advancing the cause of Socialism using Alinky's Rules for Radicals and Cloward/Piven's Tipping Point Strategy. And further advancing the Progress Agenda to include dismantling the Jeffersonian Constitution and replacing it with Progressive Constitution more pliable to accepting a subordinate role under the proposed New World Order/One World Government.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same “livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.
And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy.
Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
Keep Fighting the Good Fight!
Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
Term Limits #TermLimit
Justice in Minnesota #JIM
Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.