Skip to main content
  1. News
  2. Politics
  3. Republican

NY Times Benghazi report fails to jive with history

See also

As reported b y Fox News on Dec. 30, 2013, the recent assertion from The New York Times that there was "no involvement from Al Qaeda" has drawn a sharp rebuke from anonymous sources as well as history.

Seen by supporters of both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton as vindication, The Times speaking very plainly claims "no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault."

Parroting the Obama oft-claiming that al-Qaeda is "on the run," the same report lays the blame for the assault on the US Consulate attack was instead "fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam."

Referred to as "Republican arguments," The Times paid short shrift to the Congressional Hearings, where sworn testimony arguably contradicts much of their investigation of the attack and the events leading to.

Fox News also cited State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf declaring to the press:

No indications, at this point, that core Al Qaeda directed or planned what happened in Benghazi.

On The Wrong Side Of History...

The Washington Free Beacon last August cited sources who would speak only on grounds of anonymity that the terrorists responsible for the attack on the Benghazi Consulate (Ansar al-Sharia) is factually, an "al Qaeda-affiliated militia."

With the United States and our allies fighting an asymmetrical war on terrorism, to deny the global confederation of self-proclaimed and al-Qaeda-allied Islamic Jihad terrorists aren't connected is to argue against the history of warfare.

In the 5,000 years of recorded human history, as recent as the American War Between the States, non-uniformed irregulars have factually been an integral part of a historically more recognizable organizations.

Case In Point...

As a member of one of the pro-Confederacy Missouri Bushwhacker militias, William "Bloody Bill" Anderson was a member of the Confederate States Army only by the loosest definition, but nonetheless, Anderson served the Southern Cause well.

The other side of the coin was pro-Federalist Kansas Jayhawker, James "The Grim Chieftain" Lane.

Known for his somewhat sanguine tactics, Lane found himself drummed out of the Union Army early in the war.

Though not officially recognized by the Northern authorities, Lane and his men continued to battle against Southern forces throughout hostilities.

Historically defined, both Anderson and Lane organizationally differ little from the connection between Ansar al-Sharia and the greater al-Qaeda global network.

Advertisement

News

  • Pro-Russians killed
    Putin issues a warning after 3 armed protestors were shot dead in Ukraine
    Video
    Watch Video
  • Korean ferry capsizes
    Only one of 46 life boats were used in the South Korean ferry sinking
    World News
  • Oscar Pistorius trial
    Oscar Pistorius reads a Valentines Day card from his deceased girlfriend without tears
    Crime News
  • Google patent
    Google applies for patent for what could be the successor to Google Glass
    Tech News
  • 420 in Colorado
    Colorado will celebrate 420 for the first time since marijuana became legal
    Headlines
  • Racist Kansas murderer
    Why isn't the Jewish Community Center shooter being labeled as a terrorist?
    Video
    Watch Video

User login

Log in
Sign in with your email and password. Or reset your password.
Write for us
Interested in becoming an Examiner and sharing your experience and passion? We're always looking for quality writers. Find out more about Examiner.com and apply today!