Skip to main content
  1. AXS Entertainment
  2. Arts & Entertainment
  3. Movies

Now that Avatar has raised the bar, what now for DVDs?

Now that Avatar has raised the standard for visual effects in movies, I have to wonder what this means for DVD viewing at home. I've seen only a handful of movies that have captivated me so much that I can't sleep that night. Avatar's intense three-dimensional visual experience made me realize that there are simply some things home theater is a long ways from achieving, and that it may never be able to accomplish.

In fact, I want to see Avatar again on the big screen, this time on the IMAX, which was sold out the night I went (I should mention, the last time I saw the same movie twice in the theater was probably back in the 80s when my parents were paying). I'm sure that even with a Blu-ray player, 3D glasses, and a living room with lights all off, I won't be able to get the same experience on DVD as I got from seeing Avatar in the theater.

I'm reminded of what a let-down it was to see the made-for-TV version of Titanic in 2000, two years after having seen it in the theater. Even if there had been no commercial interruptions between every drowning vignette, Titanic on the small screen was not as compelling as on the big screen.

In addition, because Avatar must be seen in 3D to get the full experience, I wonder if flatscreen TVs can deliver the story as convincingly. Another recent 3D movie, Up, I saw at home a few weeks ago, and it didn't win me over like Disney's brilliant non-3D Wall-E released a year earlier.

So DVD viewing may end up demonstrating more than ever that storytelling can't rely on visual effects alone.
 

Comments

  • Tom 4 years ago

    Speak for yourself... 3D blu-ray will be out this year and this will look terrific in my home theater with 110" screen and high def projector. Its not 70' tall like an Imax but 10' in a 20' room I think works out even better.

  • Matt 4 years ago

    "Avatar must be seen in 3D to get the full experience"

    Bull. I saw it in 2D and gave it a 10/10. A beautiful movie with amazing CGI that doesn't need gimmicky BS like 3D to be a hit. I hope to God this trend ends before it gets started. Cameron created something great and sold it on the 3D, but it was the movie itself that mattered, not his gimmick.

  • Kyle 4 years ago

    Matt, you should try actually seeing it in 3-D before knocking the concept. This isn't the same 3-D experience delivered by "Up" and others.

Advertisement

Today's top buzz...

  • Jack White
    Reddit users have fun photoshopping an angry Jack White at a Cubs game
    Music Buzz
  • Kliff Kingsbury
    Kliff Kingsbury reads a series of flattering tweets praising his good looks
    Video
    Today's Buzz
  • Jamaal Charles
    Kansas City Chiefs make Jamaal Charles the second highest paid running back in NFL
    NFL Buzz
  • Slash
    Slash and The Conspirators crush it at Hard Rock, AP Awards
    Camera
    20 Photos
  • Monks of Mellonwah
    Exclusive interview: Monks of Mellonwah talk music, touring and more
    Camera
    9 Photos
  • Nikki Bella
    How will fans react if the WWE decides to turn Nikki Bella into a heel?
    Camera
    5 Photos