Obama has been thinking for the future of America although his plans have been not liked by many and especially the Republicans. However, there is one example of leader who finally even was killed without court: Nicolae Ceaușescu. In the 1980s he decided to get rid of the loans and the country was almost in a military situation. In the streets long lines of people waiting for waffles (some even with mold) were complimented by no power in restaurants and villagers coming to the capital to by tens of breads for the next months. The people could not stand the miserable social environment and killed Ceaușescu.
The crisis in Romania was a result of the communist regime when the scissors between subsistence level and wealthy people was high as privileges and the hope of people of democracy was killed from the very early age. However, overspending and taking loans was a communist pattern that resulted in crises which destroyed the very framework of the social and economic system of Eastern Europe.
What Obama says with his plan is: if we want to be a strong country, we need to begin to pay off the national loans and to save. It can be continued: if we want to be a country with a stable economic framework, we need to turn to a social country and to pay the loans not by increasing the social pressure but by increasing the trust and empathy to each other. We need to begin to live as a community and to help each other. We are people because we are members of society. I may live in my home, you may live in your home, but I and you have been connected and we both are responsible for society.
Unfortunately, there are many people who live to use society for their own goals. Then,
to live as a community does not mean not to reveal the corrupted expenses and to ask people to return money that they spend for corrupted projects. There are many people who have to be put on the wall of American shame and why because of such people will suffer innocent Americans who work perfectly but will lose their jobs just because general projects of cuts.
Cutting the cost should include very serious quality filters of all occupied positions especially in the academic sector.
Why somebody will be left without job while at the same time a liar like Elisabeth Cashdan gets more than 100,000 dollars to reproduce corrupted behavior at University of Utah?
Why somebody will be left without job while at the same time a liar like Douglass W Bailey will stay a well-paid professor probably to have more money for the next woman victim using the safe electronic server of the San Francisco State University ?
Why somebody will be left without job while at the same time pseudo-professor like Ruth Tringham will spend money for pseudoscience which just covers devastating invisible behavior?
There are many ways to integrate the people in a new national ideals and the most respectful way is not to hit innocent victims.
Comments